Indian BSF Chief is Terrified by Pakistani Snipers.

[MastanKhan]

Sir I don't expect it from a senior person like you such fanaticism. How can be you so sure that his head was blown 1000 yards away? That was also a claim by some official like this one. How can be it certain? If you are so sure about it then each & every thing what fan boys says here is true either Indian or Pakistani.

Last thing that I remember is you don't believe such claims by military officials specially Pakistani because they are liars. But know all of sudden you are believing an old time general claim at UN.

Why not such love & compassion is shown for Indian military officials when they claim about something? Some portion of their people also do hate them like us Pakistanis.

You can't stop people for one thing at the same time you are practising it.

"AMAR BIL MAROUF WA NAHI ANIL MUNKIR!"

Hi,

It was a 1000 yards head shot---and not blew the head up to a 1000 yards.

 

[blain2]

Instead of feeling good over some media tweet or random news article, our forces should do something. We are loosing men (both civilian and military) at alarming pace. India has successfully dragged us into multiple low level LICs.
We have lost more officers and men, then all the wars combined in our history. If I go with official figures, we have lost 1.5 division equivalent in this WoT. We have lost Lieutenant General rank officers. We have lost billions of dollers worth of equipment. And if we kill 2 of their ranks on LoC, same day we lost 10 soldiers in Balochistan, FATA or Karachi.
We cant even provide security to a poor woman and her daughter, working for a mere Rs. 300/per day polio campaign. We cant even save lives of poor women, working in field at LoC.

What are we bragging about?

Sorry for being candid and hurting feeling of anyone. I am disappointed

I think your post deserves an answer. The issue is one of watching over our interests. In pursuit of interests, casualties and losses are expected.

We are taking casualties because Pakistan's foreign policy remains independent to this day. Pakistan will not bend to what the regional or extra-regional powers want to dictate to us. This is where multiple fronts are opened up to force Pakistan into submission. Now its a matter of the will of this nation because it will be bombarded with propaganda (you will hear how Pakistan is regressing, how religious militancy is taking over Pakistan etc. when the reality is that things have been trending upwards despite the LICs and massive drain on the economy) and you will see economic threats being hurled and you will see military pressure being applied. Let me state this very frankly that on the eve of 1947, this country was never tested. The ones who joined the federation of Pakistan were mostly landed families who did not spend a night in the jails of the British during the freedom struggle. So the independence was had rather easily. But for other reasons, now we are having to pay these dues in both blood and treasure. As long as the Pakistani nation values what it is sacrificing in pursuit of Pakistan's goal of running an independent foreign policy, these sacrifices are well worth it.

What has gone on in Afghanistan and what is going on there with Taliban is what I call the long play. In the short to medium term, Pakistan will suffer reverses and casualties, but if the goal is to secure Pakistan in the long run then these fronts will have to be taken up despite losses in men and material. We don't have an alternate. Giving up in Afghanistan is going back to the situation prior to 1979 with an antagonistic eastern and western front. This is because there is no incentive for India to settle the Kashmir issue and with the Americans using India as a proxy against China (see the revamped American National Defence Policy), increasingly Pakistan and India will be at odds.

As for this thread, we should remember that when Pakistan meets India on the LoC/IB, it is done on the basis of equals and reciprocity. This is no small task for a smaller nation faced off against a much larger adversary. I don't say this to brag, but to highlight that we have to do this because we don't want to be cowed by anyone. The action taken against the Indian side is in line with Pakistani posture to deter with reciprocity.

For some, the easy way would be to surrender Pakistan's own interests in favour of those of the regional/extra-regional powers and call it a day.

 

[django]

I think your post deserves an answer. The issue is one of watching over our interests. In pursuit of interests, casualties and losses are expected.

We are taking casualties because Pakistan's foreign policy remains independent to this day. Pakistan will not bend to what the regional or extra-regional powers want to dictate to us. This is where multiple fronts are opened up to force Pakistan into submission. Now its a matter of the will of this nation because it will be bombarded with propaganda (you will hear how Pakistan is regressing, how religious militancy is taking over Pakistan etc. when the reality is that things have been trending upwards despite the LICs and massive drain on the economy) and you will see economic threats being hurled and you will see military pressure being applied. Let me state this very frankly that on the eve of 1947, this country was never tested. The ones who joined the federation of Pakistan were mostly landed families who did not spend a night in the jails of the British during the freedom struggle. So the independence was had rather easily. But for other reasons, now we are having to pay these dues in both blood and treasure. As long as the Pakistani nation values what it is sacrificing in pursuit of Pakistan's goal of running an independent foreign policy, these sacrifices are well worth it.

What has gone on in Afghanistan and what is going on there with Taliban is what I call the long play. In the short to medium term, Pakistan will suffer reverses and casualties, but if the goal is to secure Pakistan in the long run then these fronts will have to be taken up despite losses in men and material. We don't have an alternate. Giving up in Afghanistan is going back to the situation prior to 1979 with an antagonistic eastern and western front. This is because there is no incentive for India to settle the Kashmir issue and with the Americans using India as a proxy against China (see the revamped American National Defence Policy), increasingly Pakistan and India will be at odds.

As for this thread, we should remember that when Pakistan meets India on the LoC/IB, it is done on the basis of equals and reciprocity. This is no small task for a smaller nation faced off against a much larger adversary. I don't say this to brag, but to highlight that we have to do this because we don't want to be cowed by anyone. The actions taken against the Indian side is in line with Pakistani posture to deter with reciprocity.

For some, the easy way would be to surrender Pakistan's own interests in favour of those of the regional/extra-regional powers and call it a day.

Sir excellent response to @Rajput_Pakistani who could also do well to listen to the frank and realist views of non other than former ISI chief Lt Gen Asad Durrani.Kudos Sir

 

[SipahSalar]

Bullseye. The Rambo met his end. Something similar to this I suppose but ofcourse with more deadly accurancy.

What stupidity is this, the guys in the video are speaking Arabic.

My man---. Please---don't post silly posts---. This news that you posted means nothing---.

What I commented on--was real---.

Sure, just don't mind when we ask you to bring give the source.

 

[Photon]

The most ridiculous aspect of Indian claims is that while it's no secret that Indian soldiers outnumber the Pakistani troops with a 3:1 ratio, when was the last time the Indians admitted more than a single causality on any given day, yet they always claim in no less than six Pakistani casualties after every clash. I guess that's what happens when you are reading from a script for the audience.

@Irfan Baloch @DESERT FIGHTER @The Eagle @snow lake @BHarwana

Not even a month ago, you twerp.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ing-by-pakistan-army/articleshow/62222157.cms

 

[MastanKhan]

What stupidity is this, the guys in the video are speaking Arabic.


Sure, just don't mind when we ask you to bring give the source.

Hi,

Source was the jang newspaper sometimes in the late 80's maybe maybe early 90's.

 

[Arsalan 345]

http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/entir...situation-2-jawans-among-4-killed-35-injured/

two more bsf jawans injured. just write bsf jawan on google.it's funny lol. they wanted to heat up loc,it's for bipin rawat.

 

[Amigator]

Hi,

It was a 1000 yards head shot---and not blew the head up to a 1000 yards.

You really know what I mean, I don't use much punctuations in sentence.

How is reliable source back then to believe something if it's not reliable now?

Nothing is perfect, Sir! We should contribute to constructive arguments.

 

[Windjammer]

Hi,

Source was the jang newspaper sometimes in the late 80's maybe maybe early 90's.

@MastanKhan Sahib, lets assume the news is authentic, so the Pakistani officer was accompanying a UN observer during a relative calm period, he was in the open and under the circumstances unsuspecting when he was shot at, this is as cowardice as Indians calling the flag meeting and ambushing our soldiers. Now compare that with present circumstances and Pakistani sniper picking out the target through a small loophole.

Not even a month ago, you twerp.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ing-by-pakistan-army/articleshow/62222157.cms

You are dense, how many times have India accepted more than a single causality and how many times they claimed killing just one Pakistani soldier, it's always, multiple posts hit, bunkers destroyed and Pakistani troops killed. Just to make themselves credible, they even pull rank and file out of thin air.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

What stupidity is this, the guys in the video are speaking Arabic.

Read my comment first.

 

[MastanKhan]

@MastanKhan Sahib, lets assume the news is authentic, so the Pakistani officer was accompanying a UN observer during a relative calm period, he was in the open and under the circumstances unsuspecting when he was shot at, this is as cowardice as Indians calling the flag meeting and ambushing our soldiers.

Hi,

There is no doubt about that---. The point was that indian snipers are as committed as are the pakistani snipers---.

You really know what I mean, I don't use much punctuations in sentence.

How is reliable source back then to believe something if it's not reliable now?

Nothing is perfect, Sir! We should contribute to constructive arguments.

Hi,

I do not understand what you are saying.

 

[Levina]

do you think @Levina is reliable source?

Prove me wrong.



********

FYI- @Windjammer
Fiddling with an article’s title can land PDF in big time copyright issue and that’s why it is(was?) against the forum rules.
Or has the forum rules changed while I was away??? @Irfan Baloch @The Eagle @WebMaster @Horus

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Prove me wrong.

prove what you have claimed

 

[Levina]

prove what you have claimed

It wasnt a claim made by me. You did read the other tweet frm Doordarshan’s acct where DG (BSF)’s statement was posted.
So its an official statement.

 

[Bossman]

Hi,

Turn the clock back 15-25 years ago.

A pakistani general is complaining to the UN security forces---a swedish UN officer is visiting the frontline---late 80's early 90's---.

He is accompanied by a pakistani officer either the rank of the capt or a maj---they watching the other side of LOC---suddenly the head of the pakistani officer blows up from a gun shot---a bullet from the indian sniper from a 1000 yds had taken his head off---.

The general complains to the UN security personal about the indians taking a head shot from a 1000 yds.

I cannot comprehend the stupid world that you pakistani kids are living in---

Mastan,

Have stopped taking your pills again? Maybe time for my regular dressing down. You are making things up.