Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, a three-judge bench interpreting the Indian constitution would (its also not for you. Applies just to Indian citizens in India). I personally don’t think it’s relevant but it might help you to know that the bench also included Judge JM Khazi, who I’m told, is a practicing Muslim.So now hindus will tells us what is Islam. Meanwhile allowing all customs of hindus and even knives in airports by sikhs. But harmless hijab is banned.
No, a three-judge bench interpreting the Indian constitution would (its also not for you. Applies just to Indian citizens in India). I personally don’t think it’s relevant but it might help you to know that the bench also included Judge JM Khazi, who I’m told, is a practicing Muslim.
16!So now hindus will tells us what is Islam. Meanwhile allowing all customs of hindus and even knives in airports by sikhs. But harmless hijab is banned.
If you don't pay attention, nobody can help you.Now sanghis have become mullahs and giving fatwas. Lol
Now sanghis have become mullahs and giving fatwas. Lol
16!
If you don't pay attention, nobody can help you.
Again, lack of knowledge.
I had explained very many days ago, in this forum, that the answer would probably go this way.
The Indian courts have for some decades now interpreted what is an essential part of a particular religion; this applies to all judgements involving a religious practice that is handed down. It was most likely that the ruling would be against a hijab, as that is not an essential part of the religion. Prayer, the shahada, the fast have all been identified and accepted as essentials.
Again, for the Sikhs, the five 'K's have been accepted for a long time as essential to their religion. This is nothing new.
To many of us, the courts started ruling on the essentials of a religion through an error. If this were a thinking reasoning group, I would have explained in detail, as the matter has been exercising those interested in the law for some time now.
There is nothing surprising in this judgement, and it does not in any way serve to show any inclination to follow the lead of the ruling party.
I suspected this would be the case when I asked for an example.
This could use elaboration
India is that hoe that can't get enough of you
Why use that name when using swearing words
His not a holy man nor theologian. He was just a monarch
If you don't pay attention, nobody can help you.Now sanghis have become mullahs and giving fatwas. Lol
As soon as I have finished making and eating breakfast....bear with me.What is this brother can you explain
Attention how and where.. I am all ears joe
What? why?He may not be but still would prefer ppl didn't use such names as username
What? why?
As soon as I have finished making and eating breakfast....bear with me.
Should i remind you that this is a stereotypical statement and very downgrading?You, pakistanis, are bought up in an environment where the only things that give pride are - 1992 world cup win and Nuclear weapons. Hence, aththe drop of a hat, you folks keep talking about nuclear response.