Khan vilatey
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2020
- Messages
- 1,682
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
NoSo are you Talha Ahmed ??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NoSo are you Talha Ahmed ??
I don’t understand, isn’t it a good thing that this site had become so popular that people are using data from here and not BR.proves the point many journalists, youtubers or twitteraties follow PDF for info.
i'm not pointing at you @Khan vilatey but we have seen half baked stories taken from this forum being posted by people on social media.
I don’t understand, isn’t it a good thing that this site had become so popular that people are using data from here and not BR.
Any way to my point parveen’s point of view is that the payload is to small for a strategic weapon as he feels india first have the necessary miniaturization as Pakistan does. 200 kg max payload for the ground version is very small.
Remember Pakistan invested in tactical strategic weapons, inclusive of artillery shells, India did not as its not part of thier doctrine.
The second point he makes is that, this weapon is not part of Indian strategic weapons command rather is part of regular military units with all three forces!
Further analysis and information welcome
K
@HRK
Sahab-ji, aap kahaan kahaan se yeh saare gaane dekh rakhte ho!
Have to admit it was very easy on the eye! Ah, to be fifty years younger.
If that's the case then why arrest Indian officers and say the launch was accidental?As per this report Pakistan was aware of the launch of the missile before the press conference. They were informed by India.
Missile accidentally fired ‘during inspection’ at secret IAF base, Pakistan ‘didn’t track’
It’s understood that missile was following correct trajectory, didn’t veer off course, contrary to Pakistani claims, and wasn’t part of an actual firing test.theprint.in
Pakistan FM asks UN probe to find the real facts behind bhrmos accidental launch..... Now it is gearing up.
Articles 370 and 35 are parts of the Indian constitution. How does Bajwa even enter into this? Or, in general, Pakistan? The grievance that Pakistan has cannot be extended to telling us what to put into the Indian constitution, or not to put there.
In case you didn't know, Art 35 was a re-wording and an updating of an old clause in the Ranveer Code, that was brought in to ensure that the cover was extended to modern times. Ironically, it was brought in to protect the jagirs of the Dogras, and the Kashmiri Pandits.
Can you name any instances? One will do, for starters.
Indian officially have not accepted its capability about designing of Tactical nuclear warheads but there is a lot of literature from unofficial sources available.Any way to my point parveen’s point of view is that the payload is to small for a strategic weapon
Again, lack of knowledge.Karnataka court just banned hijab, if you needed any more proof. Same state will go out of its way to accommodate sikh turbans and knives. Or any other hindu custom.
To many of us, the courts started ruling on the essentials of a religion through an error. If this were a thinking reasoning group, I would have explained in detail, as the matter has been exercising those interested in the law for some time now.Now sikhs can carry knives in airports.
Google News
Comprehensive, up-to-date news coverage, aggregated from sources all over the world by Google News.news.google.com
No its not the case.... News maker are now busy converting different scenarios into news
Pakistan had prepared to launch a similar missile to strike India but held back because an initial assessment indicated something was amiss, people familiar with the matter said." This incident came really close to escalating to something very dangerous.
What do you want?
No its not the case.... News maker are now busy converting different scenarios into news
Kashaf.... O ebaadat....And you know ...how?