What's new

Indian Army's Agni II Fails Night Test

Why is that when an Indian space vehicle/Missile succeed, their success is quickly attributed to Russians and Israelis whereas when a product fails, all plethora of blame is put on DRDO. This is the third thread on same topic where pakistani's can't get enough India bashing.

At least come up with consistent BS! Decide now, who is manufacturer of Indian missiles. If DRDO gets the blame during failure, it must also get praise during success.

Tell you what, forget about India, Even mighty Russia, Germany and America cannot match record of 0 crashes of Pakistani missiles with induction in 2-3 tests in such a minuscule budget and virtually non existent hardware industry.

And Agni-2 failed because India was testing indigenous components on board.

Every child learns to walk first before running except Pakistan which can run and skate both by birth.
 
.
This missile tests and all 100's of nuclear war heads in both Pakistan's and INDIA's possession should fail..INSHANALLAH !! ...Have u ever imagined guys the fallout of a nuclear war in the neighbourhood stat:angry:es ? its MAD assured for both..but please leave us alone..

shut it u p**sy ...those who cant build whine about it
 
.
Why is that when an Indian space vehicle/Missile succeed, their success is quickly attributed to Russians and Israelis whereas when a product fails, all plethora of blame is put on DRDO. This is the third thread on same topic where pakistani's can't get enough India bashing.

At least come up with consistent BS! Decide now, who is manufacturer of Indian missiles. If DRDO gets the blame during failure, it must also get praise during success.

Tell you what, forget about India, Even mighty Russia, Germany and America cannot match record of 0 crashes of Pakistani missiles with induction in 2-3 tests in such a minuscule budget and virtually non existent hardware industry.

And Agni-2 failed because India was testing indigenous components on board.

Every child learns to walk first before running except Pakistan which can run and skate both by birth.

Hmm.. I see how desperate you are to prove that Pakistan's missile tests do fail.. but regarding the reason that they don't, you have answered your own question in the post above. When our budgets are minute and we have a huge threat in the form of India, we have to be extra extra extra careful at every step we take because unlike India we cannot afford to waste.

Ever heared of JF-17 that is Mashallah a successful fighter although every country including India who went for an air-craft had to produce a failure before getting something workable? Wana know the reason, its just the same as mentioned above. We cannot afford to fail.
 
Last edited:
. .
Ghauri-3
Country: Pakistan
Class: IRBM
Basing: Road mobile
Payload: Single warhead
Warhead: Nuclear, HE
Propulsion: Multiple-stage liquid
Range: 3000-3500 km
Status: Development

Details

The Ghauri 3 is an intermediate-range, liquid propellant ballistic missile under development by Pakistan. It is considered to be an offshoot of the Haft 5 program. The missile reportedly started development in 1994 with a planned range of 3,000 km (1864 miles). However, recently statements from Pakistan claim a range of 3500 km (2175 miles). There is also a Ghauri 3A that has a reported range of 3500 km. It is possible that the program started in 2004. It is presumed to be road mobile and use an inertial guidance system, like previous Pakistani designs. These two missiles may serve as the basis for a satellite launch vehicle (SLV) based on the Taep'o-dong 1 (SLV).



The Ghauri 3 is likely designed for long-range strikes into India. It is nuclear capable and will probably be equipped to deploy nuclear warheads against civilian and military targets deep within India. There have been three wars fought between India and Pakistan since 1947, and there is a considerable danger that the next one would be nuclear. Both sides have been engaging in an arms race, of which the Pakistani Ghauri 3 and the Indian Agni-3 are the latest developments.



Pakistan reported in late May 2004 that it would be testing the Ghauri 3 in early June, but instead tested two Hatf-5 missiles, to a range of 1,500 km (932 miles).
 
.
^^ Great logic! So according to you all the poor nations must be producing even better aircraft than F-22. Why don't you reduce your defense budget even more and maybe you end up getting star trek type space ships.

they'll reduce defences so you could invade them and wipe out all women and children n Pakistan.
Great logic !
 
.
they'll reduce defences so you could invade them and wipe out all women and children n Pakistan.
Great logic !

I was replying to your genius friend who said that success of a R&D product is inversely proportional to budget. Please jump in after reading the whole thread.
 
.
I was replying to your genius friend who said that success of a R&D product is inversely proportional to budget. Please jump in after reading the whole thread.

already have boxer try reading you post first before comment to posting
 
. .
Least concered if Pakistan is having more of these (Nuclear weapons), since it is a maintence overhead for something that has less then 1% chances of being used in this century or atleast a decade. We should only have so much as we need, I am not big fan of getting the kick of having more weapons unless there is a need.
 
. . . . .
the nukes ensure peace....

that's the irony of it all

Yes but IMO it is enough to have few for the sake of detternce, no need to have in 100's. I feel maximum it will go to 1 exchange each, thinking about nuking the entire country is insane.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom