RAHUL INDIAN
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2009
- Messages
- 939
- Reaction score
- 0
Ok it looks like your whole limited thing is based upon the kargil experience then well i can only say that although history can give an idea but cannot predict future.It is not necessary that if nukes were not used in kargil they will also not be used in the future.good luck then with your limited war thing and pray that it does not turns into full fledge because after that nothing will remain.
just answer my post number 32...
my only qsn is:
If Pakistan(some bad element in position of power) was to cause some really untolerable provocation to India, what is India supposed to do..????
realistically speaking India might be forced to attack, if this is what the situation really demands. If the provocation(s) is VERY grave, does India have any other choice than to attack..????
if you disagree than say.
My second qsn is that as has been said India does not want to attack Pakistan, why is it so necessary that there has to be a provocation from Pakisatn side..??? The only possibility of attack is some grave provocation from Pakistan side. Than why is it necessary for someone in Pakistan to cause such a act so as to cause or rather force India to attack..??? do those from Pakistan here on this forum want to do something to hurt India..??
as i can assure that India doesnt want to attack Pakistan, can my Pakistani friends here on the forum state the same that they also do not wish to cause any harm to India or to do something which India finds highly provocative and is left with no choice other than attack..????
or is it that the only desire is to cause harm to India..???
what is Pakistan's wish/view- to have friendship with India or to harm India..??(at least from the ppl on this forum- if they can speak for their country)
p.s: i never want to see India-Pakistan fight in a war ever.