Indian Army looting money from Bangladeshis in 1971 war (video)

[Kambojaric]

Refusal?!
When was the offer to join ever made?! When was it India's intention to integrate BD into the Indian fold?!

[/QUOTE]

Countries that are "one" do not need to make any "offers" for other parts to rejoin. The people come out onto the streets and demand reunification.

"United German fatherland", on the Berlin wall. Political differences divided Germany, but the people were one and the same, and actively sought the reunification of their respective countries.

Another example where geopolitics is currently preventing a unification is Romania-Moldova. Same people, same language, but one is influenced by the EU, and one by the Russians. That however has not stopped the people in both countries from coming out on to the streets demanding reunification, albeit unsuccessfully.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/in...ns_march_to_demand_reunification_with_moldova
http://www.rferl.org/a/moldova-rally-romania-unification/27638163.html
http://www.trtworld.com/europe/moldovans-rally-reunification-romania-1502

When was the last time people came out onto the streets of Chittagong demanding "unification" with India? @Doyalbaba @Al-zakir @BDforever , Do Bangladeshis want to "reunite" with India?

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

By that logic, Bangladesh's refusal to join "mother" India invalidated the "One Nation Theory".

TNT was about Muslims not being under Hindu majority.

That theory got its first hole when during partition several Muslims chose to remain in India and some even migrate to India.

In 1971 fellow Muslims of Pakistan chose to separate and form a nation

Bangladesh not joining India is to do with Bangladeshi belief of distinct lingual identity that is separate from India, just like Nepal.

The TNT is validated however if Bangladesh chooses not to join India because it believes Muslims should not be under Hindu majority.

 

[Peshwa]

Countries that are "one" do not need to make any "offers" for other parts to rejoin. The people come out onto the streets and demand reunification.

"United German fatherland", on the Berlin wall. Political differences divided Germany, but the people were one and the same, and actively sought the reunification of their respective countries.

Another example where geopolitics is currently preventing a unification is Romania-Moldova. Same people, same language, but one is influenced by the EU, and one by the Russians. That however has not stopped the people in both countries from coming out on to the streets demanding reunification, albeit unsuccessfully.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/in...ns_march_to_demand_reunification_with_moldova
http://www.rferl.org/a/moldova-rally-romania-unification/27638163.html
http://www.trtworld.com/europe/moldovans-rally-reunification-romania-1502

When was the last time people came out onto the streets of Chittagong demanding "unification" with India? @Doyalbaba @Al-zakir @BDforever , Do Bangladeshis want to "reunite" with India?

This is your statement:
By that logic, Bangladesh's refusal to join "mother" India invalidated the "One Nation Theory".

But where was the offer even made by India?! who exactly refused when India didn't even want or offer BD to "join"
We could have militarily taken over BD, we didn't. Our agenda was clear which was to break your country...

Besides, the two nation theory is a concept...
Pakistan (or Jinnah to be precise) states that Hindus and Muslims are two distinct nation....proven incorrect by the fact that there are a 180MM muslims living side by side in India.>.UNITED!

the two nation theory fails more miserably because it is not that the Hindus cant live with Muslims, but that the Muslims cant live with each other...case in point..creation of BD.
So the one nation theory stands in its living proof of India...The two nation theory falls flat on its face!

 

[el che]

Why Bangladeshis are such ungrateful cockroaches.

 

[Hassan Guy]

Wow, Bangladesh took the L not only from Pakistan...but from India too.

 

[sur]

Just a question, do Bangalis and how many of them think that they were lied to and many things blamed on Pakistani soldiers were in fact done by indians?

Also could you translate what's being said in above video?
.
.
.

http://www.enterworldpressphoto.org/editie9/close_up_gal.php?image=4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Reckoning:_Memories_of_the_1971_Bangladesh_War

https://passivevoices.com/2012/12/1...lis-and-non-bengalis-by-raw-and-mukti-bahini/

.
.
.

I also read (Link) that Mujeeb’s daughter admitted her father was a traitor, says Indian helped him raise an Indian-backed terror militia that raped and plundered in order to malign Pakistan Army...

General Mankeshaw wrote a book in which has claimed that he recruited 80,000 Hindus to create the Mukti Bahni. These terrorists were dressed up in Pakistan Army uniform and raped and pillaged Pakistani Bengalis.

 

[bluesky]

Just a question, do Bangalis and how many of them think that they were lied to and many things blamed on Pakistani soldiers were in fact done by indians?

Also could you translate what's being said in above video?.

http://www.enterworldpressphoto.org/editie9/close_up_gal.php?image=4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Reckoning:_Memories_of_the_1971_Bangladesh_War

https://passivevoices.com/2012/12/1...lis-and-non-bengalis-by-raw-and-mukti-bahini/ View attachment 361984
.
I also read (Link) that Mujeeb’s daughter admitted her father was a traitor, says Indian helped him raise an Indian-backed terror militia that raped and plundered in order to malign Pakistan Army...

General Mankeshaw wrote a book in which has claimed that he recruited 80,000 Hindus to create the Mukti Bahni. These terrorists were dressed up in Pakistan Army uniform and raped and pillaged Pakistani Bengalis.

Pakistan Army troops did the most of heinous things that a normal human being cannot even imagine. On the contrary, Indian Jawans were trying to find out the RAZAKAARs. The original video speaks of razakaars in Hindi. IA troops were not there to kill them, but were taking them in their custody so that these Razakaars are not lynched by the Bengali Muktis.

Anyway, Pakistan is not ashamed of what their troops did and their humiliation when their 90,000 troops were captured by the IA troops. Shame on the PA troops. I ask them to come now because we are prepared now and are not in loin clothe lungis like the Muktis were in 1971.

 

[Riyad]

By that logic, Bangladesh's refusal to join "mother" India invalidated the "One Nation Theory".

Bangladesh or East Bengal was always different from Indian Bengal culturally and also linguistically ( huge difference in accent, like British English and American English). Indian Bengali accent is closest to the text book Bengali while Bangladeshi Bengali is spoken without thinking much about rules and grammar.

Indian Bengali is like British English and Bangladeshi Bengali is American English.

Culture is also different. Indian Bengal is hugely dominated by Hindu culture with almost zero Islamic influence but in case of Bangladesh the culture has huge Islamic influence with some Hindu imprints.

We could have remained as separate state from West Bengal under Indian union but our people are Muslims hence living in Indian union was politically very difficult. East Bengal was destined to be Bangladesh. While becoming Bangladesh it had to pass through the acid test. Being part of Pakistan for a while was the acid test. We realised in 1971 that we are not Pakistanis, we are not Indians either. We are Bangladeshi.

 

[Riyad]

Why Bangladeshis are such ungrateful cockroaches.

BDforever is a pro-Pakistan Bangladeshi. This thread is the proof.

There are two types of Bangladeshis. Pro-Indian and Pro-Pakistani. Interestingly pro-Pakistan is are not vocal about affection in Bangladesh due to sensitivity and fear of being called Razakars.

We are not ungrateful to India but as you know majority, more than 90% of us are Muslims. Some of us are influenced by religious differences to have an opinion about India and its contribution in our liberation war but overall we Bangladeshis are very grateful to India for its support and help in 1971.

Why Bangladeshis are such ungrateful cockroaches.

BDforever is a pro-Pakistan Bangladeshi. This thread is the proof.

There are two types of Bangladeshis. Pro-Indian and Pro-Pakistani. Interestingly pro-Pakistan is are not vocal about affection in Bangladesh due to sensitivity and fear of being called Razakars.

We are not ungrateful to India but as you know majority, more than 90% of us are Muslims. Some of us are influenced by religious differences to have an opinion about India and its contribution in our liberation war but overall we Bangladeshis are very grateful to India for its support and help in 1971.

 

[BD_India_friend]

BDforever is a pro-Pakistan Bangladeshi. This thread is the proof.

There are two types of Bangladeshis. Pro-Indian and Pro-Pakistani. Interestingly pro-Pakistan is are not vocal about affection in Bangladesh due to sensitivity and fear of being called Razakars.

We are not ungrateful to India but as you know majority, more than 90% of us are Muslims. Some of us are influenced by religious differences to have an opinion about India and its contribution in our liberation war but overall we Bangladeshis are very grateful to India for its support and help in 1971.

We should neither be pro-Pakistan nor pro-India. We should be pro-Bangladesh

BDforever is a pro-Pakistan Bangladeshi.

He forgot '71 too fast.

Doesn't matter whether we stayed with Pakistan or not, they will always be extremely racist towards us make fun of skin colour pass derogatory remarks against us.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Coz we r not involve in funding any extremists to a flag of India....nd we have freedom in our country not like u were if any kohli fan wave a flag of India he was got arrested....nd remember u r trying it frm 1948 bt still it was with us...

No wonder why brain dead bakhts are most ignorant cunts on this planet
http://zeenews.india.com/cricket/sh...for-wearing-pakistan-team-jersey_1959962.html

 

[Homo Sapiens]

Hardly "neck to neck".

Pakistan (1000 ha) Agricultural Area

View attachment 361914

Pakistan (2014) Arable Land + others = 36 252
Pakistan population = 190 million

per capita (1000 ha) = 190.8

Bangladesh (1000 ha) Agricultural Area

View attachment 361915

Bangladesh (2014) Arable Land + others = 9 099
Bangladesh population = 156 million

per capita (1000 ha) = 58.3

Source
http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RL/visualize

I was talking about agricultural production.It doesn't mater how much land you have but how much you can get from that land.Our agricultural yield per hectare is much higher than Pakistan.For example Pakistan produced 36 miliion ton of grain cereal in 2014 while Bangladesh produced 38.3 million ton according to FAOSTAT.
http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC

Most of Pakistani arable land is marginal with a lot of fallow and have less agro climatic potential,while Bangladeshi arable land is one of the best in the world,which can be seen in cereal yield per hectare,Pakistan can produce 2747 kg per hectare while Bangladesh produce 4406 kg per hectare according to World bank data in 2014.
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.YLD.CREL.KG?locations=PK
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.YLD.CREL.KG?locations=BD

 

[BDforever]

BDforever is a pro-Pakistan Bangladeshi. This thread is the proof.

There are two types of Bangladeshis. Pro-Indian and Pro-Pakistani.

bachara hasai amake khub
no there is a third type, Nationalist group..
We are beating you pros (dalal and razakars) in every front now,

We should neither be pro-Pakistan nor pro-India. We should be pro-Bangladesh


He forgot '71 too fast.

Doesn't matter whether we stayed with Pakistan or not, they will always be extremely racist towards us make fun of skin colour pass derogatory remarks against us.

 

[el che]

BDforever is a pro-Pakistan Bangladeshi. This thread is the proof.

There are two types of Bangladeshis. Pro-Indian and Pro-Pakistani. Interestingly pro-Pakistan is are not vocal about affection in Bangladesh due to sensitivity and fear of being called Razakars.

We are not ungrateful to India but as you know majority, more than 90% of us are Muslims. Some of us are influenced by religious differences to have an opinion about India and its contribution in our liberation war but overall we Bangladeshis are very grateful to India for its support and help in 1971.

Thanks, Actually for the first time probably I have seen a post by a BD member where India is shown in positive light. The truth is that Pakistanis have superiority complex because of their relatively fairer skin on an average. They would have always treated you as a second class had BD been a part of Pakistan. India's help or not, BD and its bengali culture was doomed with Pakistan and separation from Pakistan was necessary for BD people to live with respect.

 

[Indian_gorkha]

Wow... I never knew Bangladeshis had camera's that could produce videos with that quality in 1971.