[Indian] Army colonel killed in encounter

[Swift]

RIP to the brave soldier. We will achieve the cause for which he laid his life.

By the way who is terrorist in Swat, FATA and Balochistan?

 

[karan.1970]

Have you ever seen any such comment from me in case of any Indian force's death in North East ????

NO na so try to understand the difference between Kashmir and an Indian state

You are entitled to your view, but for every Indian, J&K is as much a state of India as Sindh or Balochistan or Punjab (Pakistani) are a part of Pakistan.

Casualties are expected in war against terrorism and who knows it better than Pakistan today. While regrettable, they are necessary and India is ready for these sacrifices. As I said, I expect a bunch of these terrorists getting knocked off in next few days.. Here's hoping to that..

 

[Spring Onion]

Does not matter where the location is, a terrorist is a terrorist. If you feel this way then please tell you army to get out of Baluchistan and the North West frontier where your army is also viewed at " Terrorist" siding with the US. The death of a soldier is not something you had to take a dig on, being a journalist yourself I expected that you understand the norms of journalism which calls for not politicizing a uniformed personnel's death. I dont know what's wrong with you today but i haven't seen or expected such low level posting from you.

Sure you can my army to get out of Balochistan or NWFP only in case if these were disputed territories under UN.


SO NO you can not compare Pakistani provinces with Indian occupation of Jammu and Kashmir.

Bringing in these two provinces of Pakistan in debate is the weakest point Indians take up.


Just go and check why India needs to keep thousands of soldiers to keep a tab on ordinary Kashmiris .
Why you need to kill innocent Kashmiris in fake encounters.


They are not terrorists.

 

[desiman]

No dude for that they have double standard

ya I have noticed, big huge double standards lol

 

[Kinetic]

Indian occupier military officer killed by Kashmiri freedom fighters.

Get out of Kashmir and stop the terror Indian army

Kashmiri people with other Indians fighting the militancy.

Army recruitment in Kashmir.....

And as you know for thousand of years Kashmir was part of India. Indians are doing what needed to protect national integrity.

 

[Spring Onion]

You are entitled to your view, but for every Indian, J&K is as much a state of India as Sindh or Balochistan or Punjab (Pakistani) are a part of Pakistan.

Casualties are expected in war against terrorism and who knows it better than Pakistan today. While regrettable, they are necessary and India is ready for these sacrifices. As I said, I expect a bunch of these terrorists getting knocked off in next few days.. Here's hoping to that..

What Indians think is not important in case of Kashmir. Its a disputed territory and NOT part of India.

Indian army is not fighting war against terrorism in Held Kashmir but war against innocent Kashmiris.

 

[Swift]

Sure you can my army to get out of Balochistan or NWFP only in case if these were disputed territories under UN.


SO NO you can not compare Pakistani provinces with Indian occupation of Jammu and Kashmir.

Bringing in these two provinces of Pakistan in debate is the weakest point Indians take up.


Just go and check why India needs to keep thousands of soldiers to keep a tab on ordinary Kashmiris .
Why you need to kill innocent Kashmiris in fake encounters.


They are not terrorists.

You think they are not disputed but sm people of the region think so if you are worried about ppl's aspirations in Kashmir then these territories are as disputed as Kashmir. UN or no UN if people's aspiration is the key then they all are disputed.

 

[Ammyy]

Just go and check why India needs to keep thousands of soldiers to keep a tab on ordinary Kashmiris .

.

India need these soldiers to save J&K people from Pakistan sponsored terrorism

 

[Ganga]

A lot of terrorists have been killed lately.good going IA

 

[Spring Onion]

Kashmiri people with other Indians fighting the militancy.
.

Srinagar protest against indian occupation in Kashmir

 

[SurvivoR]

No offense but what the hell has this news got to do on Defence.pk?

Its totally irrelevant... unless of course, if we are celebrating a win for the Freedom Fighters in indian Occupied Kashmir.

 

[Spring Onion]

SIKHS & KASHMIRIS in UK Obseved 15th Aug 08 as BLACK DAY

 

[Kinetic]

What Indians think is not important in case of Kashmir. Its a disputed territory and NOT part of India.

Indian army is not fighting war against terrorism in Held Kashmir but war against innocent Kashmiris.

I think you are not aware of the innocent civilians killed by the terrorist in Kashmir, do you? We know that when fighting militancy security forces sometimes killed some civilians but that was unintentional and have been prosecuted by higher authorities. But is it the same case when Pakistani security forces fights militants?

Kashmir was part of India from the early days of history and now also its part of India. After independence it joined India just like other princely states and if you talk about Muslim majority than India never considered religion based partition of India nor does most of them Muslims.

The 'disputed' designation is just another show piece from UN which is sixty years old, as you know if we have to believe in UN or have to do what UN says than many thing have to be changed entirely. I don't want to mention them here.

 

[TechLahore]

Kashmir is recognized by the UN as disputed territory. There is no equivalence between what is going on in Kashmir and what has happened in Baluchistan. A more apt comparison with Baluchistan would be the Naxalite insurgency currently raging in India. Yes, the latter's scale dwarfs the former in terms of territory and numbers of insurgents involved but both of these are genuine internal issues. Neither the Naxal NE, nor Baluchistan are disputed territories.

There is nothing to gain from this discussion on PDF.

We are always saddened by the loss of life on humanitarian grounds, but we certainly do NOT accept the occupation of Kashmir. This is an issue that must be resolved if peace is ever to visit South Asia. It cannot be brushed under the carpet regardless of how loudly proclamations are made about it not being disputed. You just need to look up a standard map to figure this out...

Thread closed.