Don't be hasty, I never made a direct comparison. I merely raised the point that arguments that it can never happen in a 'gazillion' years are childish. Your state is relatively weak, particularly in an economic sense, aside from being politically unstable and riddled with sectarian conflict. A weak state cannot control its domain for long, particularly against a well-funded opposition; if the Baloch separatists were to be properly funded rather been thrown little hand-outs now and then.
Excuses as to why 90K or 50K if one were to take your word for it, surrendered are of little interest to anyone but your countrymen. We can go into the details but why bother, the end result is known to all and as I said, I never made any direct comparison.
China joining Vietnam to kick US out would be odd and silly as then it would have to take on the might of US. India had no such problem with Pak. Not sure the Soviets would back China against US as they did with India, but I see no significance of that in the present context.
Ultimately, what happens to your country matters little in the long run from an Indian perspective. If even you are gone, we have a much bigger headache to the east. Besides for India, the idea in Baloch would be bleed your country and exhaust its already strained resources. Whether they receive their freedom or not is hardly paramount.
Isn't that your official excuse for LoC violations? Why would poor Pak start a conflict on the east when its fighting a war in the west?
Your paid mercenaries are doing their job just perfectly .....
FC Balochistan Arrests BLF Terrorist Escaping in Woman Clothes
Nah that must be one of the poorer ones, no worries we can get much better.
Besides, you have a source for that, it looks like you caught that guy and dressed him up.
Last edited:
. Anyways, to give you a fresh idea of modern warfare, US and AFG are two unequal countries, USA -- probably the most developed, AFG, probably the most underdeveloped. You can see the outcome 
