Indian American woman slams New York pub for decorating bathroom with Hindu gods

[Hamza913]

for someone whose nation didn't last even 25 years.

 

[samv]

I'm sick of Hindus being so smug towards Abrahamic religions just because our followers can win wars. It's not like Hindus were (or are) always peaceful, Kshatriyas were savages, they just weren't able to conquer much land outside of India.

It's not our problem you guys couldn't conquer outside your neighbourhood like Muslims and Christians could.

But... there is an issue with foundational violence.

The Torah, the Bible and the Quran each have a lot of violence and hate in them. There are beautiful teachings too, but these are sacred books and they contain many teachings that are not peaceful.

Theologically, a deity that wilfully burns people in a hellfire also engages in a violent act.

 

[Hamza913]

The Torah, the Bible and the Quran each have a lot of violence and hate in them. There are beautiful teachings too, but these are sacred books and they contain many teachings that are not peaceful.

We're not hippies. We don't believe in this ludicrous notion of pacifism.

Theologically, a deity that wilfully burns people in a hellfire also engages in a violent act.

Obviously.

 

[Darwin]

I'm sick of Hindus being so smug towards Abrahamic religions just because our followers can win wars. It's not like Hindus were (or are) always peaceful, Kshatriyas were savages, they just weren't able to conquer much land outside of India.

It's not our problem you guys couldn't conquer outside your neighbourhood like Muslims and Christians could.

"It's the new converts who are the most zealous".

 

[samv]

We're not hippies. We don't believe in this ludicrous notion of pacifism.

Hinduism is not pacifist. Jainism and Buddhism are pacifist.

Obviously.

So you should be able to see why people who value peace and love, want nothing to do with an angry and hateful deity (of any type)?

 

[Jackdaws]

Again, reality bites.

 

[Hamza913]

"It's the new converts who are the most zealous".

There have been Muslims in Pakistan ever since the first century of Islam so I don't know what you mean by "new converts".

Again, reality bites.

Oh the irony!

So you should be able to see why people who value peace and love, want nothing to do with an angry and hateful deity (of any type)?

All I see is emotional idiots who don't really understand the concept of reality not being subject to your feelings.

 

[samv]

All I see is emotional idiots who don't really understand the concept of reality not being subject to your feelings.

Not everyone agrees with the Abrahamic concept of 'reality.'

 

[Jackdaws]

There have been Muslims in Pakistan ever since the first century of Islam so I don't know what you mean by "new converts".



Oh the irony!



All I see is emotional idiots who don't really understand the concept of reality not being subject to your feelings.

Lol. After being conquered by all and sundry, that is some serious Stockholm syndrome you folk suffer.

 

[Hamza913]

Lol. After being conquered by all and sundry, that is some serious Stockholm syndrome you folk suffer.

Stockholm syndrome? Rofl did you forget where so many of their Lashkars came from? Or all the indigenous dynasties such as the ones in Mysore, Gujarat, Sindh, Kashmir, Bahawalpur, Bengal, Gilgit-Baltistan, KPK, Balochistan, Dera Ghazi Khan, etc?

And did you forget where Hinduism came from?

Stupid monkey.

 

[Jackdaws]

Stockholm syndrome? Rofl did you forget where so many of their Lashkars came from? Or all the indigenous dynasties such as the ones in Mysore, Gujarat, Shah Mir, Samma, Bahawalpur, Bengal, etc?

And did you forget where Hinduism came from?

Stupid monkey.

Lol. Says someone who has been conquered by Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Brits, Americans and now the Chinese. Always willing to bow to the latest conqueror. Aren't you chaps making Chinese compulsory?

 

[Hamza913]

Says someone who has been conquered by Hindus,

As per you we were all Hindus. Make up your mind lol, we can't be conquered by people we once were.

And it's not like Hindu dynasties didn't spread murder and thievery across India:

Muslims

So are we suddenly not Muslims in your eyes? Ah well, it doesn't really matter what you monkeys think. The facts won't change because of your squealing.

Sikhs

Who originally came from what is now Pakistan, and were Punjabi.

Brits

Again, who also conquered you. In fact, they ruled over you for 50 years longer.

Americans and now the Chinese.

What fantasy land do you live in? If you consider what the Americans did and CPEC to be conquests, then I wonder what you consider Pakistan taking 1/3 of Kashmir to be. As per your logic, that's probably Indian qiyamah.

Always willing to bow to the latest conqueror.

I bow to nobody other than Allah.

And since you're an Indian, I really wouldn't talk about bowing if I were you.

Aren't you chaps making Chinese compulsory?

Seems as if you only use collective terminology when it suits you.

The Pakistani government does something? You'll refer to Pakistanis as a whole.

Muslims do something? You won't refer to Muslims as a whole (unless it's something bad).

Your logic is hilariously incoherent, and it's interesting to see how you will not address my points (probably since you can't).

 

[Jackdaws]

As per you we were all Hindus. Make up your mind lol, we can't be conquered by people we once were.

And it's not like Hindu dynasties didn't spread murder and thievery across India:

So are we suddenly not Muslims in your eyes? Ah well, it doesn't really matter what you monkeys think. The facts won't change because of your squealing.



Who originally came from what is now Pakistan, and were Punjabi.



Again, who also conquered you. In fact, they ruled over you for 50 years longer.



What fantasy land do you live in? If you consider what the Americans did and CPEC to be conquests, then I wonder what you consider Pakistan taking 1/3 of Kashmir to be. As per your logic, that's probably Indian qiyamah.



I bow to nobody other than Allah.

And since you're an Indian, I really wouldn't talk about bowing if I were you.



Seems as if you only use collective terminology when it suits you.

The Pakistani government does something? You'll refer to Pakistanis as a whole.

Muslims do something? You won't refer to Muslims as a whole (unless it's something bad).

Your logic is hilariously incoherent, and it's interesting to see how you must resort to whataboutism rather than actually addressing my points (since you can't).

When did I ever say you were ever Hindus? You just adjust to whoever is your current overlord.

 

[Hamza913]

When did I ever say you were ever Hindus?

So what were we then? As per you we weren't Hindu, we weren't Sikh, we weren't (and apparently aren't) Muslim, so what were we? Did we just poof into existence in 1947?

You just adjust to whoever is your current overlord.

A Hindu talking about "overlords".



You still haven't been able to answer my points.

Not everyone agrees with the Abrahamic concept of 'reality.'

That doesn't matter, it won't change the fact that we're right and you're wrong.

 

[Jackdaws]

So what were we then? As per you we weren't Hindu, we weren't Sikh, we weren't (and apparently aren't) Muslim, so what were we? Did we just poof into existence in 1947?



A Hindu talking about "overlords".



You still haven't been able to answer my points, Abdul Baqarah.

Just chameleons. If you had valid points, I would counter them.