Maoists have been attacking neighboring countries too.
Yeah, that is like saying Communists have been attacking in Europe. Just because the term is generic of a class of people doesn't mean its the same groups.
Our Maoists are in Indian hinterland, not border areas. Our particular group has been exclusively focused on India. They don't wish to take Bangladesh, they wish to bring ''peoples revolution" in India.
You might be confusing Pakistan with Occupied Kashmir and terrorism with Kashmiri freedom fighters.
No, unless you think simple markets in UP or hotels in Mumbai are in Jammu & Kashmir.
So, no, I am not confusing anything, though we as a country do class any person coming over from Pakistan to die in Kashmir as a terrorist - and we get truckloads of them.
As for ''Jihad'' and ''Jihadistic tendencies'', there is nothing wrong with Jihad since Jihad is a spiritual concept completely unrelated to terrorism.
You can call 'day' as 'night' for all I care.
I and the civilized world see the terrorists who say they are Muslim,
have been for generations and say they are on jihad and say they are dying for Islam... explode in markets and kill people.
You can call it gardening for all we care.
Bull. It's never that way. North Korea, for example, hasn't done any ''Jihad'' outside of Korea. Yet the whole world bothers them. It's politics, don't take it at face value.
Because North Korea regularly threatens war on South Korea.
Do you see someone giving a crap about Myanmar or Sri Lanka?
Why? Because the killers in those countries aren't jumping borders to kill citizens of other countries.
Do you know what happened to LTTE when they crossed the border and killed the Indian PM ?
India became against LTTE and helped Lanka kill them. Why did India not do it before? Because the problem did not affect us.