Indian Aggression

[neutral_person]

Since all the Indian members are not responding to the topic, we can only conclude that they agree that India is an aggressive state.
India does not want peace with it's neighbors, it only want to gain more land by any means possible.

At least they agree with the truth.
The first step is acceptance.

The first step is not quoting a blog.

 

[humanfirst]

Each and every points mentioned in OP is extremely biased and one sided accounts of incidents with an overt agenda to malign India..After all,this "india sucks too" arguement is the only source of happiness for some sad minds.

 

[SamantK]

In the case of Hyderabad, this is the defining situation for a invasion.

n June 1948, Mountbatten prepared the 'Heads of Agreement' deal which offered Hyderabad the status of an autonomous dominion nation under India. The deal called for the restriction of the regular Hyderabadi armed forces along with a disbanding of its voluntary forces. While it allowed the Nizam to continue as the executive head of the state, it called for a plebiscite along with general democratic elections to set up a constituent assembly. The Hyderabad government would continue to administer its territory as before, leaving only foreign affairs to be handled by the Indian government.

Although the plan was approved and signed by the Indians, it was rejected by the Nizam who demanded only complete independence or the status of a dominion under the British Commonwealth.
Operation Polo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[neutral_person]

By that logic, what does this mean?

Mihir Sharma: India's shameful kowtow to China - Business Standard

Link is not opening (am on my smartphone with shitty data), can you summarize what the article is so I can comment on it?

 

[Ignited Mind]

We don't have to take seriously a country which is used to being kicked around like a football.

This is how their President gets 'manhandled' at international level:

Obama meets Zardari at Nato but signals no end to diplomatic standoff | World news | guardian.co.uk

 

[KRAIT]

Theek hai yaar humne agression kiya....jo karna hai kar lo....

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Link is not opening (am on my smartphone with shitty data), can you summarize what the article is so I can comment on it?

You can turn off the images while browsing on a smartphone, that will save bandwidth if you are on a limited plan.

Anyway, it is off topic. I'm sure you'll end up reading the article eventually.

 

[Ignited Mind]

Pakistanis themselves don't take their own country seriously.

Why do we have to listen to the tantrums of some of the world's lowest taxpayers?

Pakistani love for their country doesn't reach their pockets.

 

[Jade]

If you are peaceful then why did you invade Goa?

The fact is that you are no peaceful, you are fully willing to use force to get your way.

India liberated Goa and not invaded Goa , as Goa was always a part of India. the Britishers did not occupy Goa because they were friendly with the Portugal.

 

[Supply&Demand]

By that same logic China and Pakistan have every right to invade India.
Like I said, it doesn't matter what your reasons are, you invaded a country that was not fighting you.

As for Kashmir, The nazims of Hyderabad and a few other places acceded to Pakistan. So why didn't you allow them to go to Pakistan?

The deal with partition was that Muslim majority would to to Pakistan and Hindu majority would go to India. You betrayed that deal and chose an aggressive stance and thus became the root cause of all the problems in South Asia.
If India had allowed partition to happen according to the deal then maybe today we could have had a much better relationship and even visa free travel to each other's country.

Instead we got war and hate thanks to your actions.

The root cause of problems in South Asia is ur unacceptability of Hindus incharge of country larger than, according to Jinnah,'a moth eaten' Pakistan. Do u really think, if we give Kashmir to u in platter all the problems will disappear? ur hero Hafizz sayeed and Zaid Hamid dream of islamizing India and cutting the heads of 800 millions hindus..so as far as we know all these are hogwash.

 

[Shinigami]

By that same logic China and Pakistan have every right to invade India.
Like I said, it doesn't matter what your reasons are, you invaded a country that was not fighting you.

71 war was started by pakistan.

Operation Chengiz Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The nazims of Hyderabad and a few other places acceded to Pakistan. So why didn't you allow them to go to Pakistan?

who told u that?

The deal with partition was that Muslim majority would to to Pakistan and Hindu majority would go to India. You betrayed that deal and chose an aggressive stance and thus became the root cause of all the problems in South Asia.
If India had allowed partition to happen according to the deal then maybe today we could have had a much better relationship and even visa free travel to each other's country.

Instead we got war and hate thanks to your actions.

Kashmiri maharaja acceded to india AFTER pakistan invaded. read about the 1947 war

 

[Major Shaitan Singh]

That Article is BullS!t... The Guy doesn't the actual fact.....

Jinnah was indeed a great man but not a good negotiator..... He Accept what ever he got, he never fought for it.

For Indian We had vast Majority of leaders who wanted to stay back in India and negotiated for India and thats the reason Pakistan has to loose a lot and they cannot blame it now on Indian....

Indian as Aggressor.... India is a Land of Mahavira and Buddha .... We don't want WAR that the reason we came back from Borders after Parliament attack, we always wanted to give you second chance and live in Brotherhood and Prosperity ....But you only wanted to destroy India with Terrorism and indirect War........

Now the Time has come to say enough is enough..... you will get what you want !!!.... Let prove it in the Sindh and Lahore what we can do if we want.

 

[Rusty]

In the case of Hyderabad, this is the defining situation for a invasion.

n June 1948, Mountbatten prepared the 'Heads of Agreement' deal which offered Hyderabad the status of an autonomous dominion nation under India. The deal called for the restriction of the regular Hyderabadi armed forces along with a disbanding of its voluntary forces. While it allowed the Nizam to continue as the executive head of the state, it called for a plebiscite along with general democratic elections to set up a constituent assembly. The Hyderabad government would continue to administer its territory as before, leaving only foreign affairs to be handled by the Indian government.

Although the plan was approved and signed by the Indians, it was rejected by the Nizam who demanded only complete independence or the status of a dominion under the British Commonwealth.
Operation Polo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Right so you did invade Hyderabad!

The nazim had a choice of Pakistan or India, he chose Pakistan and India invaded.

Why the double standards?

By your very own standards Pakistan had a right to invade Kashmir and India should not have interfered like Pakistan did not interfere with Hyderabad and the other states that chose Pakistan.

 

[Ignited Mind]

This is a country which lets other bomb its people for a few $$$, and then their Air Force chief has the gall to challenge the Prime Minister inside the parliament.

It's not a country, it's a joke. So laugh on.

 

[SamantK]

By that same logic China and Pakistan have every right to invade India.
Like I said, it doesn't matter what your reasons are, you invaded a country that was not fighting you.

As for Kashmir, The nazims of Hyderabad and a few other places acceded to Pakistan. So why didn't you allow them to go to Pakistan?

The deal with partition was that Muslim majority would to to Pakistan and Hindu majority would go to India. You betrayed that deal and chose an aggressive stance and thus became the root cause of all the problems in South Asia.
If India had allowed partition to happen according to the deal then maybe today we could have had a much better relationship and even visa free travel to each other's country.

Instead we got war and hate thanks to your actions.

Kashmir wanted to accede to pakistan but your triger happy Generals went and launched a tribal insurgency which started killing and raping the locals. The Raja requested India's help, India put a condition that if India were to give help Kashmir will accede to India..

There was no such thing as population swap, get your facts straight, the princely state was offered accession to Pakistan or India.

For Hyderabad: No country in this world will allow a situation wherein the piece of land is inside its state when even a plebiscite was rejected by the Nizam.

Right so you did invade Hyderabad!

The nazim had a choice of Pakistan or India, he chose Pakistan and India invaded.

Why the double standards?

By your very own standards Pakistan had a right to invade Kashmir and India should not have interfered like Pakistan did not interfere with Hyderabad and the other states that chose Pakistan.

Kashnmir is not Inside India nor Inside Pakistan, Hyderabad was.