Tea addict
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2015
- Messages
- 872
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
No wrestling section when it comes to world cupsSquash is not even a real sport.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No wrestling section when it comes to world cupsSquash is not even a real sport.
coz you cant play it right?
and another problem is that you cant playi t in your slums so I agree with you its not sportsCoz no one gives penny under horseshyt about it. Even Computer games championship have more following than squash.
and another preoblem is that you cant playi t in your slums so I agree with you its not sports
good for youAtleast we can spell in our slums.
ya I need badam...I am unable to remember that when Pakistan defeated India in world cup last time last time...Tub bhi badam khaya karo...
In all the videos it were the indian wrestlers who packed more muscles than Pakistanis.. So don't know how can you say we won only because of technique.I am not a wrestling expert, although my grandfather was. I've wrestled and played kabaddi in village. Most Indians talking shit here, I can probably take down within 10 seconds. Unlike Indian athletes, I've never taken steroids, but unlike current Pakistani wrestling doctrine, I always focused more on technique than brute strength. Today, Indians have learned that technique can over power strength, but there is nobody to teach this to Pakistani pahlwaans. Pakistanis have more strength than Indian wrestlers, but they don't know how to utilize it.
They use simple physics to let weight and strength work against you, while most Pakistani wrestlers have not understood that concept yet.
Once they do, it's a rap for Indian pahlwaans.
In all the videos it were the indian wrestlers who packed more muscles than Pakistanis.. So don't know how can you say we won only because of technique.
Actually only paindu wrestlers who looks fat think muscles doesn't generate power.Only someone that has never wrestled before in their life will say that muscle is more important than technique.
The shortest indians are the North East guys and they are also the toughest.. Whats your point?
Neither did your kind who married their women to mughals.... they still retain their "names".Well it were rough but i think i still have indian first name with my desi surname.. Not some arab, turkish, afghan or persian first name with some soomro, Choudhury, gujjar, bajwa etc
When the going gets tough, the tough gets going.
Sire we did lose in cricket however our wins overall are more than India's. The same can be said about hockey as well. Am I missing your point here??You lose in cricket, you lose in hockey, you lose in football, you wouldn't stand the chances of a man with one wooden leg in badminton, but you don't lose in wrestling because your match fees are too high.
Got it.
Ohhh boy.. The ones who gave their daughters families doesn't exist in Cureent day india.. Why do you think there are so many ranghar Raos and Ranas im Pakistan?Neither did your kind who married their women to mughals.... they still retain their "names".
And the point wasnt to make retarded babies like you... but to occupy your land and make you dhimmis ... which was a success..
And soomros etc ruled Sindh for hundreds of years... unlike your kind... which came to grips only after 47.
Bwtn the other guy you are replying to is Pashtun aka Afghan.... ask him if his elders were there for chicks or to build empires...