India with us on verdict, says China

[ranjeet]

China claims that 70 countries support China's stance. They issue this map to prove their point.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

CCP's delusions are getting worse and worse by the minute.

Supporting China here is as logical as supporting recolonization of Asia by Europeans.

 

[GR!FF!N]

There could be a deal here...India supporting China in the South China Sea and China supporting India at the NSG...

India never makes a "Deal" to get anything.We earn what is ours.

For NSG,we can't think to make a deal to revert our stand on UNCLOS,as India is itself a shining proof of UNCLOS and UN backed arbitration chapter.

China claims that 70 countries support China's stance. They issue this map to prove their point.

For domestic consumption only.

 

[jaunty]

China claims that 70 countries support China's stance. They issue this map to prove their point.

That's what they feed their population. Too bad, they can't check international news without a vpn.

 

[liall]

india cant even if they want to. US is india/s sugar daddy only for this reason

You even know what's a sugar daddy?

 

[Allen Iverson]

india cant even if they want to. US is india/s sugar daddy only for this reason

You think so..?? Do you know what India did, when USA begged India not to support IRAN by buying its oil in the market when all the other US supporters stopped trading with IRAN.. India told uncle SAM to Fagg off and bought Billions of dollars worth oil, and made a payment of 600 Million USD on the same day as a token of faith.. Ask Iranians about this @SOHEIL @mohsen .. For India uncle SAM or Chinkis doesn't matter.. They do what is good for them without giving a rat's *** to anyone.. India chose to support Iran because we saw that Iran did nothing wrong.. As simple as that.. No one can bully India like they do to some third world nations.. If you know what I mean???

There could be a deal here...India supporting China in the South China Sea and China supporting India at the NSG...

We already enjoy every benefits of NSG membership in the form of Waiver from 2008 onwards.. Now, even if china willing to support us for NSG, we don't need it.. As for SCS arbitration, Chinkis can bid bye bye for their honeymoon dream of Indian Support..

 

[gayMo]

Guys remember what I said none of our opinions matter so needn't troll.
To me it seems like China is forcing India to make a stand. Right now it seems that since China was overtly anti India at NSG and India has maintained diplomatic answer to SCS, they want India to take an anti china stance on this, hence the public announcement.
I think PH should also say that India supports the verdict publicly.
Finally Indians

You think so..?? Do you know what India did, when USA begged India not to support IRAN by buying its oil in the market when all the other US supporters stopped trading with IRAN.. India told uncle SAM to Fagg off and bought Billions of dollars worth oil, and made a payment of 600 Million USD on the same day as a token of faith.. Ask Iranians about this @SOHEIL @mohsen .. For India uncle SAM or Chinkis doesn't matter.. They do what is good for them without giving a rat's *** to anyone.. India chose to support Iran because we saw that Iran did nothing wrong.. As simple as that.. No one can bully India like they do to some third world nations.. If you know what I mean???


We already enjoy every benefits of NSG membership in the form of Waiver from 2008 onwards.. Now, even if china willing to support us for NSG, we don't need it.. As for SCS arbitration, Chinkis can bid bye bye for their honeymoon dream of Indian Support..

do you think China cares for our support

 

[pher]

Indians run amok again? the solution is quite simple, just ask your big-mouth modiji to issue a statement to refute China's claim. If he don't have a ball to do that, you better learn to shut up.

 

[unbiasedopinion]

China is not opposed to any country’s membership, nor have we stated that we support any country’s membership. Our concern on the NSG is the way of the entry and the procedure to follow for non-signatories to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. India’s entry would not be some low-hanging fruit and it needs discussion by parties concerned,” Mr. Liu said, adding that at least “eight to nine countries” shared Chinese concerns on procedure, contrary to India’s view

Similarly, India is not in favor or against any country. Any decision by an international tribunal must be respected by its members, just like India has been honoring it since long time.

 

[Allen Iverson]

do you think China cares for our support

Do you think otherwise??

Indians run amok again? the solution is quite simple, just ask your big-mouth modiji to issue a statement to refute China's claim. If he don't have a ball to do that, you better learn to shut up.

If you insult our Prime minister again, then we'll start to rip apart your every CCP leader including your Respected President XI Jin ping in this thread in such a way that, their parents will be ashamed of giving birth to them.. If the mods permit, I'm ready for that, shall we?? Do you want to see that??? one more word in disrespect to our Prime minister, and you are dead meat here in PDF..
Mods try to spend some time here.. @Horus @WebMaster @Taygibay @Oscar.. This thread is rapidly getting derailed by the unnecessary Chinese provocation without any meaningful discussion.. Pls don't blame me for further troll wars.. Peace

 

[jha]

China claims that 70 countries support China's stance. They issue this map to prove their point.

Good to see Alaska following its own foreign policy. True federation.

OT : India's diplomatic response must have infuriated them. All thats needed is for Philippines to claim the same,

 

[Perpendicular]

This seems to be a propaganda by CCP.
Australia upheld The Hague verdict like India did. And today Chinese as usual are issuing warnings to OZ. So how come this difference of assessment.

 

[maximuswarrior]

CCP's delusions are getting worse and worse by the minute.

Supporting China here is as logical as supporting recolonization of Asia by Europeans.

Just because you view China as your main competitor doesn't mean that you have to fabricate stuff. China doesn't colonize countries.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Good to see Alaska following its own foreign policy. True federation.

OT : India's diplomatic response must have infuriated them. All thats needed is for Philippines to claim the same,

Nice catch

There could be a deal here...India supporting China in the South China Sea and China supporting India at the NSG...

Not possible.

Indian NSG membership means little compared to overwhelming negative consequences of supporting China on SCS dispute.

 

[Taygibay]

Off-topic answer.

If you insult our Prime minister again, then we'll ... If the mods permit, I'm ready for that, shall we?? Do you want to see that??? one more word in disrespect to our Prime minister, and you are dead meat here in PDF..
Mods try to spend some time here.. @Horus @WebMaster @Taygibay @Oscar.. This thread is rapidly getting derailed by the unnecessary Chinese provocation without any meaningful discussion.. Pls don't blame me for further troll wars.. Peace

Hi there Allen Iverson. I will try to provide an answer but you may not find it fulfilling, sorry.

First, you could have reported that post by @pher. That goes straight to moderation's attention.
None of those you tagged are officially mods, you see, me least of all.

Second, I'm guessing you chose that route because you were in doubt about mods considering
"big mouth" as an insult ... and you'd be right. If we suppose for instance that Donald Trump gets
elected president of the US in autumn, he'd be head of state and yet, he is undeniably a loud mouth.

Third and most importantly, while attacking greats of history is forbidden by the rules, active politi-
-cians must be scrutinized and discussed and their actions questioned, that's political maturity as
Manticore once put it. It is a free speech consequence and a necessity that we speak our mind on
our elected rulers, everywhere. Think of the slurs that accompanied Barack Obama for 2 mandates
from terrorist to socialist, the latter truly being seen as worse and a true insult by US conservatives.

Fourth and most important in the long run, adding such phrases : and you are dead meat here in PDF ...
negates most of your point.

Now, this said, I do understand your displeasure but you could take a tongue in cheek approach.
Just consider for example that "unnecessary Chinese provocation without any meaningful discussion"
which I tend to recognize as factual comes from being deprived of true democracy ( 28M voters/ 1,7B pop. )
and thus excuse their lack of sophistication in international relations. I mean, the people are acting no
more bluntly on PDF than their government in the Spratleys or Tien An Men square.

So in short, not much can be done in this case, sorry!
Take it with a grain of salt and a cup of tea and have a great day despite it.
All the best IRL, Tay.

Off-topic closed.