What's new

India wins non-permanent seat at UN Security Council

Patrician

BANNED
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
1,167
Reaction score
0
India wins non-permanent seat at UN Security Council

New York: After years of intense diplomatic canvassing, India has won a non-permanent seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). India got 187 votes in the 192-member UN General Assembly, which met on Tuesday.

India was standing unopposed for the Asia seat after the only other contestant in this category, Kazakhstan, withdrew from the race in December last year.

Each non-permanent country stays on the council for two years, alongside the permanent powers: Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, who have the right to veto any council resolution.

What New Delhi would be looking at now is a claim for a permanent seat when serious negotiations begin for expanding the Security Council next year.

Germany too made it to the Security Council. Had Germany lost, it would have been a setback for India because G-4, which wants the Security Council expansion, are all in UNSC now and can work together.


India wins non-permanent seat at UN Security Council

:victory::victory::victory::victory:

THE INDIANS ARE COMING, THE INDIANS ARE COMING!
 
.
Good news. If India was the only unopposed candidate for the Asia seat, then how did Japan get into UNSC? Apparently all the G-4 members are now in the UNSC.

edit: India will be replacing Japan.
 
. .
India elected to UNSC as non-permanent member - The Times of India

UNITED NATIONS: After a gap of 19 years, India was today elected as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council, a position which would help it push more aggressively for the reform of the world body's top organ.

India secured an emphatic win, with 187 of the 191 member states in the General Assembly backing its candidature and one member state abstaining from the vote.

India, which is a founding member of the UN, has been on the Council six times earlier, but not since 1992.

In 1996, India lost to Japan by a huge margin of 100 votes. This time, however, it is taking over the Asia seat from Japan, being the sole candidate from the region in the race as Kazakhstan pulled out earlier this year.

In the run-up to the vote, External Affairs Minister S M Krishna, who was in New York for 10 days last month, met leaders of a record 56 countries on the margins of the UN General Assembly's annual session.

"We have worked hard... we have pushed for every single vote," India's envoy to the UN, Hardeep Singh Puri, said.

In February, India's candidature was endorsed by the Asian Group but it still had to get support of 128 countries, two-thirds of the 192 members of the UN General Assembly.

Other "clean slate" candidates included South Africa that got the Africa seat replacing Uganda with the vote of 182 members in its favour, and Colombia, which secured the seat for the Group of Latin American and Caribbean States, replacing Mexico.

The elected members take their spots on January 1, 2011 and will serve for two years.

South Africa has returned to the Council after a break of two years when it had served its first term from 2007-2008. Colombia, like India, has previously served six terms.

The five new countries will be replacing Austria, Japan, Mexico, Turkey and Uganda. The two seats for Western Europe and Others Group were fought for by Canada, Germany and Portugal.

India, which is among the three largest troop contributing countries to the UN, has already highlighted the significance of all the BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) being on the Council together, which could present a united front on several contentious international issues.

It has also underlined that the IBSA (India, Brazil and South Africa) will also be on the Council together.

New Delhi, which is seeking expansion in both the permanent and non-permanent categories of the UN Security Council as part of its reform, is hoping that change comes in the next two years while it is already in the Council.
 
. . .
lol @ Indians are coming, this is rotated every 2 years. Pakistan is often been a member as well.

When the Kashmir resolutions were passed, Pakistan was on the security council but did not vote for impartiality.
 
.
lol @ Indians are coming, this is rotated every 2 years. Pakistan is often been a member as well.

When the Kashmir resolutions were passed, Pakistan was on the security council but did not vote for impartiality.

None of the Non permanent members have a veto power in the UNSC. No big deal... This seat..

The only upside is the timing... being on the UNSC for next 2 years, will give India opportunity to push the expansion agenda more vigourously..
 
. .
None of the Non permanent members have a veto power in the UNSC. No big deal... This seat..

The only upside is the timing... being on the UNSC for next 2 years, will give India opportunity to push the expansion agenda more vigourously..
This seat is passed around and everyone is given a chance now and then. Pakistan has had many chances, even I think we were on it 2 cycles ago. I don't see how this would affect your bid.

India is not becoming Permanent member because of the US and its issues with India getting veto power.
 
.
More than the seat, the timing at which it has come is important.

I mean just think about it. Now India can raise 26/11 and Permanent UNSC seat at the top of its voice for a full two years and that too when all major countries are more or less agreeing that UNSC reform is the need of the hour.

In two years, we would have raised the pitch sooooo high that it will make our case on both 26/11 and permanent UNSC watertight.
 
. .
May be. May be not. But India for sure will make full use of this opportunity.

Of course, to make full use of any influence to further national interests in the prerogative of all sovereign nations, including a rising star like India.

However, sometimes, India also will have the maturity and farsightedness to compromise here and there for longer term gains.
 
. .
Of course, to make full use of any influence to further national interests in the prerogative of all sovereign nations, including a rising star like India.

However, sometimes, India also will have the maturity and farsightedness to compromise here and there for longer term gains.

One major long-term gain for India is that enemies of the state such as Hafiz Saeed/ Dawood Ibrahim etc are brought to justice.

Now we will see a renewed effort on this.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom