What's new

India will not tolerate any anti-China activity: Pranab

Flintlock

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
6,176
Reaction score
0
India will not tolerate any anti-China activity: Pranab

Foreign Ministers are expected to discuss the boundary issue



BEIJING: Visiting External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee on Thursday said India would never tolerate any political anti-China activities by anyone in its territory.

Mr. Mukherjee made the remarks during talks with his Chinese counterpart Yang Jiechi. He reiterated the Indian government’s persistent stance on the Tibet issue, according to the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

Indian officials have previously reiterated the government’s stance that the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of China’s territory.

Boosting strategic ties


Mr. Mukherjee said India would make joint efforts with China to further the strategic bilateral ties.

“I am happy to discuss and share our common perception on bilateral, regional and international situations,” Mr. Mukherjee told Mr. Yang in his opening remarks at their official talks here.

The Foreign Ministers are expected to discuss the boundary row and irritants surrounding it, and also review the progress in the talks between the Special Representatives of the two countries, who have conducted 11 rounds of negotiations.

Mr. Yang thanked India for sending relief materials worth $5 million to quake victims in western China. He noted that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as well as Mr. Mukherjee had written letters personally, expressing grief over the natural calamity, which claimed nearly 70,000 lives.

The meeting was attended by Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon and Ambassador Nirupama Rao.

Trade target


Earlier in the day, Mr. Mukherjee officially inaugurated the Consulate-General of India in the southern city of Guangzhou.

At the inauguration, Mr. Mukherjee said India was keen to learn from China’s “remarkable success” in developing Special Economic Zones.

“The trade target of $60 billion by 2010 set by our two Prime Ministers is very likely to be surpassed before 2010,” Mr. Mukherjee, who is on a four-day visit to China, said. Now the trade between the two is around $40 billion.

Mr. Mukherjee said Guangdong province, which accounts for one-third of China’s total foreign trade, had always been at the forefront of the country’s economic reform.

“There is tremendous interest in India to learn from your experiences, including your remarkable success in developing your Special Economic Zone,” he said.

He said Indian firms had invested in China, including in the Pearl River Delta, and “this trend is likely to escalate in the coming years.”

Meeting cancelled


Mr. Mukherjee’s meeting with Premier Wen Jiabao scheduled for Friday has been called off as he had to rush to the earthquake-shattered southwest China.Mr. Mukherjee will instead meet Vice-President Xi Jinping on Friday. Mr. Xi, who was appointed in March, is tipped to be the successor of President Hu Jintao when he completes his second term. In the presence of Mr. Mukherjee and Mr. Yang, a memorandum of understanding on sharing of flood season hydrological data of the Brahmaputra was signed by Ms. Rao and the Vice-Minister of China’s Ministry of Water Resources, Hu Siyi.

The data provided by China will ensure the safety and security of the people living along the river. — Xinhua/PTI

© Copyright 2000 - 2008 The Hindu
 
.
This Idiotic Upa, they turned out to be Chinese servants....the Tibeteans were'nt even allowed a free protest!!! I am not going to vote for them....
 
.
This is mere pragmatism; what else was our defense minister expected to say? Further, the commies need to be satisfied back home.

As far as Tibet is concerned; the only feasible solution is increased transparency and more autonomy (religious and cultural).
 
.
i think it is necessary to ban anti-chinese activity ,if china and india want to keep a closer economic and political relations. because you will not believe a country who saying to be a friend of yours ,but encourage and support some movements to anti you.
so i think it is sensible and a good message to the two country.
 
.
This Idiotic Upa, they turned out to be Chinese servants....the Tibeteans were'nt even allowed a free protest!!! I am not going to vote for them....

Its the best option for India right now.

Be practical, we can't go around pissing off China or the borders will remain disputed for the next three centuries.
 
.
Its the best option for India right now.

Be practical, we can't go around pissing off China or the borders will remain disputed for the next three centuries.

Dude, neither the PLA nor the IA can do squat against eachother. 1962 was nothing but bragging rights.

So, what does pissing off China imply? As if we are scared of them?

Correct me if my assertion of your intention is wrong.
 
.
i think it is necessary to ban anti-chinese activity ,if china and india want to keep a closer economic and political relations. because you will not believe a country who saying to be a friend of yours ,but encourage and support some movements to anti you.
so i think it is sensible and a good message to the two country.

Liuyong, the Indian government supports the Dalai Lama's call for more autonomy and transparency. The GoI has stated that India considers Tibet to be a part of India.

Proxy wars are carried by both India and China against both China and India, respectively.

The statement was mere rhetoric for the commmies back home.
 
.
This is mere pragmatism; what else was our defense minister expected to say? Further, the commies need to be satisfied back home.

As far as Tibet is concerned; the only feasible solution is increased transparency and more autonomy (religious and cultural).


in some degree , you are right, pragmatism is a good attitude and positive signal at least, i think pragmatism is better than a public rivalry.

as to tibet, it is a internal affairs of china, we welcome a kindly attention,
but we will against any form interference.
 
.
Right now, let me see what we are doing, Unpresidented security for the olympic torch, comman man put to great difficulties, Tibetan protesters treated so harshly, peaceful protests were not allowed, even Sitaram Yeachuri, the commie chief was against the way the congress govt. behaved with the Tibeteans, suppoting China on Taiwan and Hong kong......What did we get in return??

China already sitting on thousands of acres of Indian territory in Kashmir, claiming Indian terrirtory in Arunachal Pradesh, claiming more in Sikkim. Selling arms to insurgents in North-east, carrying all sorts on anti-India activities...

I say do the same thing with them, support Tibet, boycott the olympics, sell arms and missiles to Taiwan, as China is doing to Pakistan....enter a defence pact with Japan,maintain excellent relations with south-korea and enter a defence pact with them work closely with them as well and maintain excellent relations with Russia.....If India is willing, China will be tied up in the south China sea itself,,,.....But, this Govt. has'ent got the will!!! ..
 
.
i think it is necessary to ban anti-chinese activity ,if china and india want to keep a closer economic and political relations. because you will not believe a country who saying to be a friend of yours ,but encourage and support some movements to anti you.
so i think it is sensible and a good message to the two country.

ddrbdgzy, in democratic countries the right to express one's self cannot be denied. The expression may or may not conform to the policies of the Govt.Just because some people demonstrate against china in India, it does not mean that the Govt supports them.

Let people say what they want..the Govt does not necessarily have to agree with them or their demands.

Lastly, all friendship & non toleration etc has to be mutual.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom