What's new

India will never accept outcome in Afghanistan decided by force: Jaishankar

We have our own interest and assets to protect it. I just want to remind our Chinese friends how they had to offer India a partnership in CPEC and on India rejecting the offer to be partners, why they had to put it in cold storage. Our small chinese friends with big mouth should check reality before bragging here. We have our interests and influence in large part of the world. Nobody can ignore us. China had tried to do it by the way of string of pearls but string of of pearl became an ornamrnt of Mrs xi only. Pakistan did lots of hu and cry but today Pakistani mefia discuss why Arab countries give modi their highest awards.

No one gives a shit whether you accept or not. India is irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
. .
I don't know what better suits India's situation in Afghanistan:

Begani shadi main Abdulah Dewana (someone getting excited over things which are not related to him- litteral mean: getting crazy in a stranger's wedding)

Or

Hum bhi hain paach sawaron main (to include yourself in other great people without any reason)
 
. .
India should send its military to Afghanistan and put their money where their mouth is. Otherwise, they just need to STFU.

India do have x times military presence from past decade or so in its embassy from normal requirement... although mostly restricted to embassy areas.
But more than enough to hold talibanis off before rescue reaches from north.
 
.
India do have x times military presence from past decade or so in its embassy from normal requirement... although mostly restricted to embassy areas.
But more than enough to hold talibanis off before rescue reaches from north.
Your Jaishankar said, "India will never accept outcome in Afghanistan decided by force"

I ask, "What will or can India do about it?"

Send it's military to change the outcome? What the F can India really do?

The answer, nothing..... Zilch. All it can do is what it does best and that is, "FART IN THE AIR".
 
. . .
Who the F asked him for his opinion?
The media clearly did, because his opinion and foreign minister of India matters.

It is not just India either, no major democratic country will accept these essentially isis type terrorists as a legitimate authority.

Taliban = ISIS... that is how the world views them. The onus is on the AT to change that perception of them. Retaking Kabul by force will end all chances of that.
 
.
Your Jaishankar said, "India will never accept outcome in Afghanistan decided by force"

I ask, "What will or can India do about it?"

Send it's military to change the outcome? What the F can India really do?

The answer, nothing..... Zilch. All it can do is what it does best and that is, "FART IN THE AIR".

India has enough military coercion going on her borders so military focus is needed on Indian borders not on some landlocked nation where its own citizens are not concerned about countries future and rather working overtime to keep living in dark ages.
India can help Afganistan but before that Afganis should help themselves.
India has poured good amount of hard infra in Afganistan, India has offered military aid and training to Afgans if Afgans sort this dark age talibs themselves then only foreign powers can help them.
Pakistan strategy is simple for Afganistan keep them under its influence by non democratic forces which will keep Afagnistan in state of war and underdevelop and can never pose any threat to pakistan.
Because its well understood if Afganistan becomes stable there are too many cards Afgans can play in KPK, karachi n balochistan to keep pakistan in boiling waters.

Afgans are much more to blame here...
 
.
India has enough military coercion going on her borders so military focus is needed on Indian borders not on some landlocked nation where its own citizens are not concerned about countries future and rather working overtime to keep living in dark ages.
India can help Afganistan but before that Afganis should help themselves.
India has poured good amount of hard infra in Afganistan, India has offered military aid and training to Afgans if Afgans sort this dark age talibs themselves then only foreign powers can help them.
Pakistan strategy is simple for Afganistan keep them under its influence by non democratic forces which will keep Afagnistan in state of war and underdevelop and can never pose any threat to pakistan.
Because its well understood if Afganistan becomes stable there are too many cards Afgans can play in KPK, karachi n balochistan to keep pakistan in boiling waters.

Afgans are much more to blame here...

The question remains, "What can India do about this?"

Answer: NOTHING

So, why is your Jaish-e-shankar farting in the air?
 
.
The question remains, "What can India do about this?"

Answer: NOTHING

So, why is your Jaish-e-shankar farting in the air?

This is diplomat speech... the most he means India wont recognize taliban govt.
India cant do anything we have no sea or land connection available. Iranian road is too trechrous and iranian blackmails will be too costly.
 
.
India will never accept outcome in Afghanistan decided by force: Jaishankar
India has been increasingly concerned by a massive surge in violence in Afghanistan, including the Taliban’s campaign to capture districts in rural areas and crucial border crossings. It has repeatedly called for an immediate ceasefire and resumption of intra-Afghan talks
By HT Correspondent
PUBLISHED ON JUL 29, 2021 02:55 PM IST
a5b5a42e-f04e-11eb-a289-ca42522c9120_1627550753723.jpg

India is working with the world community to push political negotiations to find a lasting solution to the conflict in Afghanistan and will never accept any outcome decided through the use of force, external affairs minister S Jaishankar said on Thursday.

There was a very detailed discussion on the situation in Afghanistan with visiting US secretary of state Antony Blinken on Wednesday and there is “a very strong convergence” in the positions of India and the US on this issue, Jaishankar said while answering a question in the Rajya Sabha or upper house of Parliament.

“We were very clear that there must be a negotiated political settlement in Afghanistan, that there cannot be a military solution, there cannot be a takeover by use of force in Afghanistan, that we will work with the international community to ensure that political negotiations for a settlement are pursued seriously and we would never accept any outcome which is decided by force,” he said.

He was responding to a question from BJP lawmaker Swapan Dasgupta on China’s apparent efforts to prop up the Taliban. A Taliban delegation led by chief political negotiator Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar met Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi on Wednesday, the first high-level engagement between the two sides since the US began withdrawing its troops from Afghanistan.

India has been increasingly concerned by a massive surge in violence in Afghanistan, including the Taliban’s campaign to capture districts in rural areas and crucial border crossings. It has repeatedly called for an immediate ceasefire and resumption of intra-Afghan talks to find a settlement.

Responding to another question from Samajwadi Party lawmaker Rewati Raman Singh on whether human rights and democracy had figured in his talks with Blinken, Jaishankar said the two sides had a “good discussion” on global issues such as human rights, democracy, trafficking and big tech

Jaishankar said he had highlighted that India’s approach to such issues is guided by a “quest for a perfect union”, though the government also seeks to “right historical wrongs”.

This was an apparent reference to the enactment of laws such as the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and Jaishankar had made a similar comment at his joint media interaction with Blinken on Wednesday.

Jaishankar said the issue of freedom should not be treated as “non-governance or as abdication of responsibilities”. He added, “We believe that our conversations on this subject should be balanced, we also feel that we should have the same standards when we look at the issues and that all conversations should be fact-based.”

The minister also defended India’s participation in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue or Quad, a grouping that includes Australia, Japan and the US, in the face of criticism from China while responding to more questions.

“Let me make it very clear that when it comes to our relations with the US, Quad [and] Indo-Pacific, these are all our national choices which serve our national interests. We look at Quad as a platform where four countries have come together for the good of the world, who are discussing a range of issues from making and providing vaccines to education and connectivity to maritime security,” he said.

Any narrative about the Quad not based on reality will never gain traction, and India’s work with international partners “will help deal with many regional and global challenges”, he said.

can somebody please tell gayshankar that NO BODY CARES!!!
 
.
India do have x times military presence from past decade or so in its embassy from normal requirement... although mostly restricted to embassy areas.
But more than enough to hold talibanis off before rescue reaches from north.

In addition to the ITBP deployment?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom