What's new

India wanted to break up Pak in 1971, secret papers reveal

i abbasi

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
The US administration in 1971 suspected India of "scheming" not just the separation of East Pakistan, but the "break-up" of West Pakistan and even moves against the "Pakistani side" of Kashmir, secret British official papers claim.

Nixon told the British that Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was being steered by the Soviets, in response to the building of ties between Pakistan and China.

And Kissinger said Nixon had secretly contacted the Soviet leadership to seek an assurance it would restrain India from breaking up West Pakistan.

But it was only after the American Seventh Fleet took up a threatening posture offshore that the promise was forthcoming, the papers show.

Nixon and UK Prime Minister Edward Heath met in Bermuda as India and Pakistan fought their third war since Independence.

This was the war that saw a freedom struggle in which India played a helpful role against an oppressive military hierarchy in West Pakistan, led by general Yahya Khan, creation of Bangladesh under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and the flight of hundreds of thousands of refugees into India.

But the transcripts of talks between Indira Gandhi and Heath, and of the Heath-Nixon summit in Bermuda, show it was more than that.

Gandhi, on a visit to Britain, told Heath of the pressure in her Cabinet for her to take Pakistani territory and not return it. India, she said, had seen Pakistan tying itself to China and now the United States also was establishing links with China, the papers reveal.

Nixon's friendly overtures to the Chinese, and their closeness to Pakistan, she said, had made it necessary for India to sign a treaty with the Soviet Union.

Meanwhile, Yahya Khan was also seeking British support. He wrote to Heath outlining the Indian military build-up near Pakistani territory, which included seven Army divisions confronting West Pakistan and eight near East Pakistan, the papers show.

He also wrote about the deployment by India of comparable air force and naval threats. The offensive posture adopted by India pointed in the direction of conflict, not of peace, he wrote, according to the papers.

AND WE STILL WANT FRIENDSHIP WITH INDIA,SHAME ON TRAITOR GENERAL MUSHARRAF N PM SHAUKAT AZIZ

source:H.S. Rao (Press Trust of India)
Posted online: Thursday, January 02, 2003 at 1209 hours IST
 
.
We should have gone till kashmir and regain our annexed territory. Pakistan was severly crippled at that moment. All of our today's problem would have come to an end. With Soviet Union threatning action against any intervention by US and China, we would have achieved what these reports say quite easily.
 
.
godsavetheworld,yes,u r very right,unfortunately,leadership is n was our biggest problem,lions being commanded by jackals.
 
. . .
what actually india want was to occupy the east pakistan, thats why violating all interntional laws, it broke the soverignty of a country by crossing the border when the country was facing very weak times. but unfortunately akhand bharat idea was partially successful and bharat could only manage to destroy pakistan but couldnt manage to occupy bangladesh, it became another country..
 
.
first build yourself capable of arranging food and home for your ppl...
har waqt to haar jaate ho...
china kaa sastaa maal bhi tumhaare budget mein nahi aaataa...

AUKAAT MEIN RAHO....
:rofl::rofl::rofl: Fresh off bharat rakshak!
someone won't last too long on this forum... bye :wave:
 
.
what actually india want was to occupy the east pakistan, thats why violating all interntional laws, it broke the soverignty of a country by crossing the border when the country was facing very weak times. but unfortunately akhand bharat idea was partially successful and bharat could only manage to destroy pakistan but couldnt manage to occupy bangladesh, it became another country..

You statement could not be more wrong.

India never wanted to "occupy" BD land. It actually could not even if it wanted to. The entire struggle was for freedom of BD from Pakistan, not to be merged into India. There was no such thesis even at that time.

India did cross the border but do not say it was first or others were saint. Also consideing the total time of Indian involvement and duration of entire sutuggle suggest that India was not much interested initially. Until it has to face millions of refugees from BD.

Rest is just rant.
 
.
Wat do u think india is doing now,the process of breaking of pakistan is going on indirectly...everyone knows that,
these british officials have no brains..
 
.
Yo what is this...

It would be a dream for both nations to break each other up, so far both will be quite successful if the Kashmir issue takes another turn to our favour.

Please don't act so surprised. It's all politics. Who cares if India wanted to break us up? It happened in 1971 given the circumstances- it will probably happen with Kashmir and India, nothing new.
 
.
We should have gone till kashmir and regain our annexed territory. Pakistan was severly crippled at that moment. All of our today's problem would have come to an end. With Soviet Union threatning action against any intervention by US and China, we would have achieved what these reports say quite easily.

India's evil intention, as you frankly admitted, was indeed in hot foment. But, in addition to US pressure, China also mobilized its forces along India border, causing Indian imperialists' knees to shiver and cold sweat to roll.

Dude, how pitiful that the hateful dream has never been fulfilled!
 
.
India's evil intention, as you frankly admitted, was indeed in hot foment. But, in addition to US pressure, China also mobilized its forces along India border, causing Indian imperialists' knees to shiver and cold sweat to roll.

Dude, how pitiful that the hateful dream has never been fulfilled!

Moral judgments like good and evil isn't really appropriate in such a situation. I have no doubt that India would have tried to destabilize Pakistan but what rational leader wouldn't have tried to break up a country with which they've fought 3 wars.
 
.
India's evil intention, as you frankly admitted, was indeed in hot foment. But, in addition to US pressure, China also mobilized its forces along India border, causing Indian imperialists' knees to shiver and cold sweat to roll.

Dude, how pitiful that the hateful dream has never been fulfilled!

Just not sure what happen to the brave souls who even mobilized yet Pakistan was actually broken?? Seems like Indian imperialist did not shiver that much, no???

B/W doesn't hurt if we apply logic and some brain before uttering crap :blah::blah: and letting the whole thread go down the drain, no???
 
.
India's evil intention, as you frankly admitted, was indeed in hot foment. But, in addition to US pressure, China also mobilized its forces along India border, causing Indian imperialists' knees to shiver and cold sweat to roll.

Dude, how pitiful that the hateful dream has never been fulfilled!

Your claims of being Saviour of Pakistan fall flat on its face..despite mobilizing your forces or despite US sending its seventh fleet, you could not prevent formation of Bangladesh..

was it due to the fact,that East Pakistan did not figure high on your priority list and all your affection(read strategic interests) were for west Pakistan only.

or is it the fact that India "imperialists" bested your design??
 
Last edited:
.
Moral judgments like good and evil isn't really appropriate in such a situation. I have no doubt that India would have tried to destabilize Pakistan but what rational leader wouldn't have tried to break up a country with which they've fought 3 wars.

All the talks about breaking Pakistan further is just bull sh!t....Yes there was a plan proposed by Army for complete desctruction of PA however it was rejected by then PM Indira Gandhi. Reason is plane and simple it would have been a disaster diplomatically....The reason 71 war was short and punitive in the east whereas defensive in the west is testamount to it...However is some dellusioned brains are hell bent on overlooking it then nothing can be done....
 
.
Back
Top Bottom