What's new

India unilaterally calls off talks with Pakistan

The main question ... What is the main issue between Pakistan and India for which they have fought wars n have been a bleeding wound since 1947 n pending in UN(ablel)???

Even that issue is solved , their would be no peace between India PAK. ( PAK Gen. also admit that openly) . So their is not use of all this.
 
.
MEA is ON RECORD stating that we are going to use ALL means necessary to achieve our goal.

No prize for guessing the water treaty is part of that leverage.

That had nothing to do with the Pakistan ambassador talking to the separatists.
 
.
Pakistan gets 80% of water and India 20%. It should be 95-5 in favor of Pakistan. Ayub Khan made many blunders, this was one of them. Other being not liberating Kashmir in 62.

It should be India getting 90% and PAK get 10% as per Land mass, Nehru made mistake , as Gandhi family India make mistake after 71. Should have divided Pak also into 3 country.
 
.
Good for him .. Pakistan doesn't give a damn .. Thank you come again.
If you can keep your prejudices out for sometime , actually Pakistan give a dam about new govt.
1. Look around your media. May be our ( Ind + Pak ) media is sensational but they run what people want to know.
2. Your PM actually came to India ( whatever your opinion on him he is your PM )
3. Both sides agree to resume talks.

Isnt it dam enough ???
 
.
Great .About time .Pakistan dont gonna change their policy towards us whatever is the case.We know PM Sharif dont have a clear power or policy in Pakistan .
So why should we waste our time for this useless exercise.
Just concentrate on our economy and prosperity .Ignore Pakistan for a certain extent.We can move forward without them.
 
.
That had nothing to do with the Pakistan ambassador talking to the separatists.

LOL..... you really thing so ?

Pak just exercised its leverage by using the separatists................. in return we will exercise our leverage. :disagree:

You must be really dumb to think they are not related.
 
.
That had nothing to do with the Pakistan ambassador talking to the separatists.
It in News , Indian FS Ms Singh called PAK FS Mr. Chaudhry not to talk with seperatist in this Afternoon , when PAK ignore Indian FS warning and meet them , India called off gloves.
 
.
Bring Back Rabbani as Foreign Minister.......or NO MORE TALKS.......PERIOD.

hina8-8.jpg
This time you are precise :woot:
 
.
This time you are precise :woot:

Remember the time when Rabbani was Pak FM & SM Krishna the Indian counterpart...........

Whenever his advisors used to guide him about his conduct in the next Parliament Session, he used to say......." abey woh choro mujhey yeh batao meri next Pak visit kab hai?" :rofl:

I think during there tenure we were very clooooooseeee to solving the K-Issue, & K doesn't mean Kashmir here :rofl:
 
. .
Both NS and IK don't give a f*ck to India. NS was elected on the promise of ending power crises and bringing economic stability to Pakistan along with other promises like eradicating poverty etc.

Stop overestimating yourself please. Pakistani politics never revolves around India.

Who overestimated here?
If the NS follow that policy why did he participated in Modi Swearing Ceremoney.What was the motivation for that.?Why couldnt he reject that invitation?
 
.
LOL..... you really thing so ?

Pak just exercised its leverage by using the separatists................. in return we will exercise our leverage. :disagree:

You must be really dumb to think they are not related.

No, your post was just off-topic bravado, i.e. that you will cut our water.

Are you calling me dumb? Ironic, considering that your first sentence make no sense.


you really thing so ?

You mean, you really think so? This is the word that you should have used.

See a dumb person corrected you, which by the way doesn't hold you in great light.
 
.
Indus
Brahmaputra (Yarlung Tsangpo)
Ghaghara
Gandaki
Koshi

Starting from "Indus" also known as "Sindhus" ....
Above river originating in the Tibetan Plateau in the vicinity of Lake Mansarovar, which is not a Chinese name at all, and more, Tibet is occupied territory for which Dhalai Lama is fighting....
So how the Indus/Sindhu has a Chines origin?
Have you read Vedas?
 
.
It in News , Indian FS Ms Singh called PAK FS Mr. Chaudhry not to talk with seperatist in this Afternoon , when PAK ignore Indian FS warning and meet them , India called off gloves.

The first move was silly i.e. by the ambassador, pulling off the gloves is even worse. Aside from that, there is no mention of the Indus treaty being torn up etc.
 
.
First you accuse our army of not wanting peace n than you accuse us of "harping" abt talks .. Make up your minds.. Which one is it Dr Phil?

I never said that your army doesn't want peace, I don't use that logic. Pakistani army would want peace but on its terms alone. I believe it is loath to make the necessary compromises that most sane people believe is necessary to make a workable peace - LC = border etc with other changes like autonomy etc...which was the MMS-Musharraf formula. Kayani backed off, withdrawing his support to the plan soon after Musharraf's exit. Those are facts. As is the fact that Pakistan keeps asking India to talk irrespective of 26/11 etc. You made the point that no one cares. That will always suit the status quo power fine and you are not that, we are.

This was always a tough ask. Nawaz Sharif like the PPP government before it seems to want to back away from Musharraf's formulations with NS wanting to go back to the 1999 agreement. No one in India is interested in revisiting that, consequently there is a huge build up of frustration both at the official level & even at the track 2 level with Pakistan's behavior. It was going to take a big move like Modi's decision to resume FS level talks to get the process started. To attempt & shore up domestic position by meeting with separatists even after being warned of consequences by the Indian FS was probably unnecessarily foolish (or brave, depending on what you prefer) and risks being seen by the Modi government as non-serious. The heating up of the border is hardly likely to have helped. These were FS level talks, Pakistan should have let a round go by to improve the atmospherics, it chose not to & this is the result.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom