What's new

India-U.S. to build strong, strategic defence ties: report

CONNAN

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
3,381
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
United States
The Hindu : News / National : India-U.S. to build strong, strategic defence ties: report


As U.S. President Barack Obama prepares to visit India, a prominent think tank has said that the two countries would build their strong bilateral defence ties based on the new strategic realities of Asia.

The defence relationship is one of the many bright spots in the overall bilateral relationship, said the National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR), a Washington-based think tank.

“It is expected that the United States and India will continue to develop a strong bilateral defence relationship, albeit one that looks less like an alliance than a partnership based on shared goals. U.S. and Indian armed forces will operate together more frequently, and U.S. equipment will be purchased in larger quantities by India, in part reflecting the new strategic realities of Asia and a strengthened U.S.-Indian relationship,” NBR said in its report on India.

As the United States and India continue to build their newly strengthened relationship, both partners face challenges in the process, it said adding that in the realm of operational cooperation, greater steps toward embracing integration that would help check maritime adventurism by any other power inevitably will breed concerns about whether Indian foreign policy remains independent.

“Similarly, agreements to provide advanced U.S. military equipment also require agreement to US rules and practices on the use of such equipment that test Indian proprieties and will complicate India’s ties with other suppliers of military equipment, including Russian and European companies,” the NBR said.

Looming over these bilateral security issues are the differentiated security challenges each country faces in managing complex security relationships with Pakistan and China, it noted.

“Certainly, however, bilateral cooperation on the internal challenges the Indian Armed Forces face-structural reform, domestic counterinsurgency, personnel acquisition and management reform, among others-provides opportunities that might mitigate some of the other challenges as well as help to build longer-term collaborations that will be in both countries’ interests,” it said.

NBR said India faces a complex strategic environment of both extant and emerging challenges in the region as well as at home.

Indian strategy has emphasised responding by pursuing maximum flexibility in terms of security partners but without diminishing the priority of domestic development.

Further, China looms large in Indian strategic thinking and defence planning. Indian concerns about Chinese infrastructure development in southern Tibet have been matched by force developments in the northeastern provinces that increase the possibility of tension.

Also Pakistan continues to represent the greatest near-term military challenge to India, both in conventional ways and in its use of proxy insurgents.

Moreover, in high-risk scenarios, Indian defence planners see potential Chinese military involvement in an Indo-Pak conflict, which would present a two-front challenge for India, it said.

The think-tank said the US and India continue to make enormous strides toward the type of strategic relationship that befits the status of each as a leading democracy but without pursuing a de facto alliance-like relationship.

Obstacles to closer ties remain, and in developing a productive relationship, these difficulties must be managed in order to fulfill the promise of the relationship, it noted.

Observing that in the developing Indian-U.S. strategic relationship, defense relations are a major component, it said much of this aspect of the relationship centers around increased Indian willingness to buy and integrate U.S. defence systems, a calculation which is affected by both a set of assumptions at the top-level about new political realities and an Indian system that is ill-structured to absorb massive amounts of U.S.-produced systems.

“While arms sales are important, neither side is well-served by a transactional relationship that measures progress toward a strategic relationship by the volume of arms sales,” the NBR said.
 
.
Good to see this move . In last year USA has conducted military exercise maximum with India rather than any other country.Todays Asian reality forcing both nation to come close to each other.
 
.
Welcome Obama! India Inc. is here to help


Welcome Obama! India Inc. is here to help

By ERIKA KINETZ
The Associated Press
Thursday, November 4, 2010; 2:17 AM

MUMBAI, India -- India's outsourcing companies, often blamed for stealing Main Street jobs, want Americans to know: We're hiring in the U.S.

They along with President Barack Obama, who arrives in India's financial capital Mumbai on Saturday, are at pains to reassure the American public that India is here to help the U.S.

On paper, the relationship looks great: Two big markets, two democracies, growing trade. In practice, there's a creeping sense that it may not live up to the hype. India, emboldened by its growing economic importance, is not playing by U.S. rules. And the U.S., which has lashed out at India's key outsourcing industry even as it funnels billions to its ally in the war on terror - India's archrival Pakistan - looks like less of a friend than New Delhi might like.

Many believe business can lead bilateral ties. Obama, weakened by Republican gains in Congressional midterm elections, is bringing 250 U.S. executives including GE chief Jeffrey Immelt and Honeywell's David Cote, which the U.S. India Business Council says is the largest such delegation to ever accompany a president on a foreign visit. The presidents of six universities, including Georgetown and Duke, are also set to come.

Together, they are seeking more than $10 billion in deals.

Bilateral trade, on track to hit $50 billion this fiscal year ending March, has more than doubled since 2004. Last fiscal year, India's $11 billion worth of investments in the U.S. matched U.S. investments in India for the first time ever, according to the U.S. India Business Council.

But sentiment has frayed since the two countries signed a civil nuclear cooperation agreement in 2008. Then-President George W. Bush pushed through that deal, which allowed nuclear trade with India despite its weapons program and seemed to herald a new era of cross-continential commerce.

It hasn't been that simple.

The job creating power of India's big, fast-growing market is hampered by its restrictions on foreign access to key sectors like retail, finance, education and insurance. Multinationals are wary of the shape-shifting rules that seem to govern things like taxes and environmental permits in India. And the large defense contracts that headline the wish list of deals for Obama's visit come burdened with offsets and foreign investment caps.

The Americans who accepted outsourcing of IT and back office functions in boom times as a way to free up capital for job creation at home seem less certain of the strategy's benefits during a bust.

With U.S. unemployment at 9.6 percent, India's putative role as a driver of job insecurity has leaked into campaign rhetoric - Barbara Boxer's attacks on Carly Fiorina for sending Hewlett-Packard jobs to India and China helped her win the California Senate race - and popular culture alike. NBC's new sitcom, "Outsourced," tells the story of a Kansas City company that sends most of its jobs to India.

Indian companies keep insisting, quietly, that they're not really the problem: If you don't like jobs getting sent overseas, better to direct your anger at major U.S. corporations whose race for low cost competitiveness drives India's $50 billion software services sector.
 
.
"Last fiscal year, India's $11 billion worth of investments in the U.S. matched U.S. investments in India for the first time ever, according to the U.S. India Business Council."
 
.
bhaar mein jayee aisa 'ties'.... many Indians R&D organizations are still under US sanctions, many other issues and above all they are not supporting us for permanent UNSC seat while all major ocuntries including Russia, UK, France, Japan, South Africa, Brazil, ASEAN, African Union and even some how China supported us!!!! I am not ecpecting anything out of this over hyped visit.
 
.
What military ties..Nothing will move forward till this OBAMA is in white house..I hope republicans win next Pres. election..
 
.
Obama is coming here to get jobs for american,WAT A TIME..(AS PEOPLE SAYS TIME CHANGES)
But these dumb head americans don't know large amount of employment in manf. unit is going to China,if they just bring 25% of job from china to US,then employment problem will be solved...
 
.
What military ties..Nothing will move forward till this OBAMA is in white house..I hope republicans win next Pres. election..

Actually Obama needs these ties badly, way too many American jobs at stake. Taking that into consideration along with China's perceived boorish behaviour when Obama visited & their spats with Japan recently, India probably won't have a more pliable U.S. administration on this score ever.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom