Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now you are changing Dravidian word into Hindus. you claimed that Brahui people had no connection with Dravidians.
That is what you got from my reply? I mean, I clearly said "both aryans and dravidians are hindus"...
ny ways, just curious about how much calories you are burning daily by jumping up and down in all threads... have some descent discussion for PDFs sake...
Are and were two different things.
surely mixure and adopting hinduism is the fact BUT the historically Vedic Aryan were NOT Hindus.
What you had banned was eaten by Vedic Aryans.
anyway that is another debate.
Are and were two different things.
surely mixure and adopting hinduism is the fact BUT the historically Vedic Aryan were NOT Hindus.
What you had banned was eaten by Vedic Aryans.
anyway that is another debate.
Correction : If India is NOT racist why the Whit Italian Born is still NOT considered as Indian and was barred from becoming PM?
and still why she is called italian ***** and ****** and so on by Indians?
I guess we all already knew this , this racism is the backbone of hindus religion which even in itself divided into many categories..equal rights is a far cry in a hindu dominating society today we can see the vision of jinnah being proved ..and here is something interesting thousands of hindus converting to Islam annually and nowonder we never hear anybody converting to hinduism.
steadily rising muslim poplation being denied equal opportunities to excel in life..Headline is growing and being neglected and this article is from 2 may 13 the lastest picture of muslims suffering in socalled secular india
India
Are and were two different things.
surely mixure and adopting hinduism is the fact BUT the historically Vedic Aryan were NOT Hindus.
What you had banned was eaten by Vedic Aryans.
anyway that is another debate.
Because you had no answer and you even denied economist which is a neutral source without even reading it..You just wrote loads of crap.
Because you had no answer and you even denied economist which is a neutral source without even reading it..
Just a paragraph from the report.
Elsewhere, resentment among Muslims may grow if not enough is done to redress their economic backwardness. No serious official effort has been made to assess the lot of India’s Muslims since the publication in 2006 of a study ordered by the prime minister, Manmohan Singh. Called the Sachar report, it broadly showed Muslims to be stuck at the bottom of almost every economic or social heap. Though heavily urban, Muslims had a particularly low share of public (or any formal) jobs, school and university places, and seats in politics. They earned less than other groups, were more excluded from banks and other finance, spent fewer years in school and had lower literacy rates. Pitifully few entered the army or the police force.
India
Did indian army ever had a muslim LT general (name only one) though it makes 20 % of population while sikhs had many though they make only 2% of the total population ...whats that worst racism against muslim..But I know no hindu will ever accept it as they were told when they were born that india is a secular state..
Just googled, Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain, UYSM, PVSM, AVSM, SM (BAR), VSM (BAR), ,Lt Gen Zamir -uddin Shah, Deputy chief of Army Staff (Ret.), Lt General Mohammed Ahmed Zaki (Ret.), Lt Gen Jameel Mahmood (Ret.)
Now give me 3 names of LT Gn Rank hindus in pak army. Also, equal representation is not proportional to population. If all meet the same merit, they is no law barring anybody from becoming anything in India (based on religion, race etc..) unlike pakistan where you have declare some "special" things even to get a passport. All the data shows that Indian muslims need to get out of madrasa and go to a proper school and stop studying arabic and start learning math and science...govt can't force them to do it (then there will be jumping jocks again), muslims themselves need to understand this...
Because you had no answer and you even denied economist which is a neutral source without even reading it..
Just a paragraph from the report.
Elsewhere, resentment among Muslims may grow if not enough is done to redress their economic backwardness. No serious official effort has been made to assess the lot of India’s Muslims since the publication in 2006 of a study ordered by the prime minister, Manmohan Singh. Called the Sachar report, it broadly showed Muslims to be stuck at the bottom of almost every economic or social heap. Though heavily urban, Muslims had a particularly low share of public (or any formal) jobs, school and university places, and seats in politics. They earned less than other groups, were more excluded from banks and other finance, spent fewer years in school and had lower literacy rates. Pitifully few entered the army or the police force.
India
Did indian army ever had a muslim LT general (name only one) though it makes 20 % of population while sikhs had many though they make only 2% of the total population ...whats that worst racism against muslim..But I know no hindu will ever accept it as they were told when they were born that india is a secular state..
Well zamir ud din shah was a Pak army officer not of indian , remaining three are right ..But in 66 years only three with a population 20% while sikhs with 2% have dozens... As for Pakistani hindus they are less than even 1% around 0.3 % how can you expect us to have 3 of them when even the total number of LT generals in pak army is 7 times less than that of indians..
Regarding madrassa's well thats BS , does muslims go to madrassa and learn arabic only in India world has 57 muslim nation having all muslim generals ,running banks and the whole state affairs why its only india where they are so less able ...Its just the racism of hindus nothing else..