Je suis de retour
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 120
- Reaction score
- 0
Now india could trade with Afganistan by making use of pakistans seaport as well as Pakistans Air-space
The Pak-Afghan pact was signed between Pakistan and Afghanistan under pressure from the USA on July 18. Under this pact, Pakistan will provide transit trade between Afghanistan and India through its air space.
Pakistan had denied its land route to India but it agreed to provide air space which may benefit the latter but will cause damage to Pakistan's security as well as its economy.
India has been successful in attaining Pakistani air space for trade with Afghanistan by coaxing the US to put pressure on Pakistan.
Both India and Afghanistan stand to gain while Pakistan is bound to be at a loss in more ways than one.
The government seems to have taken an important decision overnight by approving and signing the deal without consulting the parliament, leave alone the nation. Is this how foreign policy decisions are taken by a democratic government?
What is the difference between a dictator and a democratic government then?
Is there any need for India to negotiate further when it has acquired what it wanted? It never holds discussions over India-held Kashmir which it claims to be its internal issue.
It has been said that Afghanistan would facilitate Pakistan a transit trade route to Central Asian states. Did Pakistan really need a transit route to these countries via Afghanistan when we have China on our north which can easily give us access?
Last but not the least the media stated that Pakistan denies land access to India, but conveniently evaded the news that Pakistan agrees to provide air space to India.
FAHMIDA ABDUL SATTAR
Karachi
DAWN.COM | Letters to the Editor | Implications of Pak-Afghan pact
The Pak-Afghan pact was signed between Pakistan and Afghanistan under pressure from the USA on July 18. Under this pact, Pakistan will provide transit trade between Afghanistan and India through its air space.
Pakistan had denied its land route to India but it agreed to provide air space which may benefit the latter but will cause damage to Pakistan's security as well as its economy.
India has been successful in attaining Pakistani air space for trade with Afghanistan by coaxing the US to put pressure on Pakistan.
Both India and Afghanistan stand to gain while Pakistan is bound to be at a loss in more ways than one.
The government seems to have taken an important decision overnight by approving and signing the deal without consulting the parliament, leave alone the nation. Is this how foreign policy decisions are taken by a democratic government?
What is the difference between a dictator and a democratic government then?
Is there any need for India to negotiate further when it has acquired what it wanted? It never holds discussions over India-held Kashmir which it claims to be its internal issue.
It has been said that Afghanistan would facilitate Pakistan a transit trade route to Central Asian states. Did Pakistan really need a transit route to these countries via Afghanistan when we have China on our north which can easily give us access?
Last but not the least the media stated that Pakistan denies land access to India, but conveniently evaded the news that Pakistan agrees to provide air space to India.
FAHMIDA ABDUL SATTAR
Karachi
DAWN.COM | Letters to the Editor | Implications of Pak-Afghan pact
Last edited: