Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't see any signs that India will surpass the US. US economy is 8x the size of India. This Vietnamese "economist" is full of crap. Nowhere did he mention how that can be achieve unless he believe in magic.India will definitely surpass the U.S in half a century but China is a different animal altogether.
9 mun tail hoga to radha nachey gi
Vietnam ka expert hoga to India super power baney ga
If India still remains a country by 2050, that would have been an achievement.
India is like the Soviet Union glued together. When it starts to collapse, it will disintegrate very quickly.
Lee Kuan Yew said India is a union of 34 countries and he is exactly right.
As for India surpassing China?
Never ever going to happen.
No South Asian country will ever surpass any East Asian country.
East Asia has been superior to South Asia since the beginning of humanity.
Actually, it's the exact opposite.If India still remains a country by 2050, that would have been an achievement.
India is like the Soviet Union glued together. When it starts to collapse, it will disintegrate very quickly.
Lee Kuan Yew said India is a union of 34 countries and he is exactly right.
As for India surpassing China?
Never ever going to happen.
No South Asian country will ever surpass any East Asian country.
East Asia has been superior to South Asia since the beginning of humanity.
Actually, it's the exact opposite.
Note that China has always had a larger population, so India has always been richer per capita too. Combine that with the fact that India has a much greater legacy in everything from art, science, math, philosophy, and so on, and what you're saying is a joke.
1. No, it hasn't. The "India" that is being described by Maddison is ALL of the sub-Continent, while "China" is confined to only the particular dynasty in question. China has contributed more to technology and the creation of the world as we know it than all other civilizations combined, and that's a fact.
So now a Bangaldeshi will lecture us on the matter of intelligence considering the fact that your country has failed to produce one decent scientist a doctor in the past 4 decades...When Indians cannot argue with logic and reason, they start name calling (almost in all threads critical of India and its people). The Chinese troll Beidou seems far more mature and intelligent than most Indian posters in this thread.
How embarrassing that anyone is this delusional. China's contributions are secondary and measly compared to India's, let alone those of "all other civilizations combined". Jesus. Good luck convincing anyone of that.1. No, it hasn't. The "India" that is being described by Maddison is ALL of the sub-Continent, while "China" is confined to only the particular dynasty in question. China has contributed more to technology and the creation of the world as we know it than all other civilizations combined, and that's a fact.
How embarrassing that anyone is this delusional. China's contributions are secondary and measly compared to India's, let alone those of "all other civilizations combined". Jesus. Good luck convincing anyone of that.
Rice and guns.
If you're too dumb to understand the impact of just these two Chinese discoveries and inventions on your country alone your backwardness is explained with no words needed.
Without China India and the rest of the world would still be in the Middle Ages at best, on their knees before knights and feudal lords.
That's a fact - get over it.