What's new

India to install Israel-made barbwire at Bangladesh, Pakistan border

Every post you do, will have one abusive content this pretty shows how you are brought. Don't speak about rape again. It's the most disgusting topic to discuss not in defence forum.
I told you I didn't started this mud throwing. Your pathetic country mans did... :wave:

Fastest?Nothing to be proud of.Rather be ashamed of your lack of education,family planning & inbreeding.Before calling me rapist just know your faith has legalized it's rape or how much it respects minors..I am sure you will be rapist too once you consider that as a crime.:D
Talk about your country mr rapist. You dont have to think about our religion. Its going strong. ;)

BTW, you just skipped my previous reply. Reply it man. :disagree:

And religious discussion is banned here. Dont bring it. Else... :whistle:

a country which claim to have oldest civilization, a country where its most popular prime minister mentioned advanced technologies in its golden days, a country which has 1 and half billion population is getting security equipment from another country which has like 10 million population, yep definitely a Great Super Power
India STRONK! :enjoy:
 
.
I think the Chinese would sell the same fence for a cheaper price, just don't use the fence on Chinese border. Its just a fence with sensors on it.
 
.
Is it just barbwire? Because I was wondering how lame you have to be to order some tin- aluminium alloy and steel pole bars to hold them up from so far a country like Israel?
Why not go for the best, America.
 
.
India to install Israel-made barbwire at Bangladesh, Pakistan border
  • Tribune Desk
  • Published at 05:10 PM August 14, 2017
  • Last updated at 05:18 PM August 14, 2017
000_LJ4WU-690x450.jpg

In this photograph taken on February 9, 2017, Indian Border Security Force (BSF) personnel take part in a routine patrol near the India-Bangladesh border in the village of Lankamura, on the outskirts of Agartala AFP
BSF director general said the pilot projects put under trial are by the way of 'proof of concept' method, where an experiment determines if a concept for a particular task is feasible or not
India is deploying along its border with Bangladesh a smart Israel-developed barbed wire system having a ‘quick response team’ mechanism which strikes when the CCTV-powered control room detects an infiltration attempt.

Indian Border Security Force (BSF) is implementing an ambitious project called the comprehensive integrated border management system (CIBMS) as part of the ruling BJP’s plan to completely seal the India-Bangladesh and Indo-Pak borders in the next few years.

The BSF is tasked with guarding the over 6,300km long two borders and its chief, in an interview to PTI, said the new frontier guarding systems will bring a “sea change”, for the first time, in this domain.

“There is going to be a paradigm shift in our operational preparedness. As of now, we patrol from point-A to point-B (along the border). What we are now planning is to shift to a QRT (quick reaction team)-based system and a number of new technologies which have not been tried so far are being tested,” said KK Sharma, the Director General of BSF.

Sharma explained how the new border guarding mechanism, first along the “volatile” Pakistan border and then at the Indo-Bangla frontier, will work.

“The new equipment and technologies will be integrated and a feed, from CCTV cameras, will go to the border out post where there is a monitor installed.

“This will be monitored round-the-clock by two or three men. Now, we have softwares which are in a position to detect any intrusion or any change in the scenario and create an alarm,” he said.

“An automatic alarm will indicate the exact place where this intrusion (at the border) is taking place or an attempt is being made or something is being seen.

“Once we get the alarm, we will zoom our night vision cameras on that and when we come to know what is happening, we will be able to neutralise the threat. This is the idea,” Sharma added.

The BSF, raised in 1965 for border guarding roles, is running two pilot projects of 5km each in Jammu in this context and this, Sharma said, will subsequently be set up at four more porous patches: One each along the Indo-Pak IB in Punjab and Gujarat and one each at Tripura, West Bengal and Dhubri (Assam) along the Indo-Bangla border.

The director general said the pilot projects put under trial are by the way of ‘proof of concept’ method, where an experiment determines if a concept for a particular task is feasible or not.
http://www.dhakatribune.com/world/2...israel-made-fence-bangladesh-pakistan-border/




GOOD. Please do. I really want a permanent and eternal cutt-off between Pakistan and india FOREVER. This is brilliant news. Now Pakistan can look to China, Turkey and the Muslim nations West of us of whom we share the most in common with to cement our future. It's there where our future and destiny lie. Nowhere else.
 
.
You should at least try to read the article before you start mocking about anything related to India. It is not a random barb wire which is used to fence fields to prevent stray cattle. It is an integrated barb wire fencing system with sensors, CCTVs, cyber security & other high end technologies to detect intrusions and triggers alarms which generates the response of a QRT (Quick Reaction Team), more like an impenetrable border mechanism system.

Looks like some false flaggers, BD and Pak members are having orgasms over a mislead title
Wow superpower is imported system from a tiny country. Big news
 
.
Is it just barbwire? Because I was wondering how lame you have to be to order some tin- aluminium alloy and steel pole bars to hold them up from so far a country like Israel?
Why not go for the best, America.
Israel's Elbit Systems Wins £87m Contract on US-Mexico Border Fence

israel-wall-apartheid-mexico-palestine-united-states-construction.jpg

Israeli soldiers patrol the border with the northern Gaza Strip during a drill near Netiv HaasaraReuters
Israeli company Elbit Systems, the largest supplier to the Israeli military, has been awarded a $87m contract from the US Department of Homeland Security to produce and install surveillance systems for the US-Mexico border fence.

Why advertise with us
The contract is for an unspecified number of observation posts to be built along the US-Mexico border fence in the area of Nogales, south of Tuscon.

Elbit Systems was involved in the West Bank wall separating the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Israel. The company provides "intrusion detection systems" and infrastructure support for the barrier.

Arizona's Republican senator John McCain said: "Arizonans have been waiting more than a decade for the Department of Homeland Security to place the needed technology along our border to support the Border Patrol and fully secure our southern border.

"After many months of delay, the awarding of this contract to Elbit Systems is an important development toward fully securing the border in Arizona. These Integrated Fixed Towers in southern Arizona will give our agents the ability to detect, evaluate and respond to all illegal entries crossing our border."

Elbit Systems is the Israeli military's largest supplier of drones, military technology and surveillance. Its drones are described on its website as "the backbone of the Israel Defence Force's UAS [unmanned aerial system] force". They have been used on Palestinian civilians in strikes on Gaza.

As part of its US tender, Elbit said that Homeland Security needed to "adopt a more complete border security system, which combines radar and electro-optical sensors, unattended ground sensors, unmanned air systems, and manned or unmanned ground vehicles to enhances agents' flexibility and responsiveness".

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/israels-elbit-systems-wins-87m-contract-us-mexico-border-fence-1439378



Better Than a Wall: A New Detection System Can Help Monitor the U.S.-Mexico Border

The Integrated Towers System promises to give border-control agents more insight into the threats they face before they face them. And it's only the beginning.


Steve Craft
By Mitch Moxley
Jan 28, 2016

  • 419
Agent Jose Verdugo's workplace is vast: 1,100 square miles of hilly, sandy terrain surrounding Nogales, Arizona, the second-largest border-patrol station in the country. Depending on the day's assignment, he'll hike trails or drive along the boundary between the United States and Mexico. Some days he investigates human trafficking or drug smuggling. (Half of the marijuana that crosses the southwest border is captured in the Tucson sector, where Nogales is situated.) Other days Verdugo investigates a suspicious blip on a radar system that often turns out to be foul weather, or a rancher tending his land, or a stray cow.


Over the years, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has used a series of strategies, some more effective than others, to monitor huge swaths of rugged terrain along the border. It needed a solution that would prevent agents like Verdugo from being deployed for false alarms, so they could chase and investigate narcos rather than livestock and be prepared for what they encountered when they caught up. This would require permanent sensors that could provide a clear picture to agents back at the station of what was happening in the field. The Integrated Fixed Towers (IFT) system, which includes radar and day and night cameras mounted on a series of towers along the border, promises to solve the problem. The radar and cameras transmit data over microwave link to the Nogales station, where agents determine an appropriate course of action. The system, which enables agents to accurately monitor areas previously unobserved, is, Verdugo says, like "turning on a light switch" along the dark, mysterious border.

The IFT is only the latest of the government's attempts to cover the southwestern border with sensors capable of detecting unlawful crossings. The previous setup, known as SBInet, was a network of newly designed radar, cameras, and heat and motion detectors, which was supposed to allow border-patrol agents to work from a common operational picture. Boeing won the contract in 2006, and the system was initiated across 53 miles of Arizona's Mexico border.

gallery-1454016611-border-2.jpg

Steve Craft
It quickly became a boondoggle. Total acquisition costs rose to a projected $1.6 billion, a staggering $1.4 billion more than initial estimated costs, according to the Government Accountability Office. It also didn't really work. The main problem was communication—the information transmitted to the command center was unreliable. It didn't operate well in the varied terrain of the Tucson sector, and was often triggered by bad weather, leading to false positives. In 2010, as costs rose, then Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano halted the program and asked border patrol to start over. "One of the lessons of SBInet was you're better off going small than big, and you're better off going off-the-shelf than innovative," says Christopher Wilson, a border-security expert and deputy director of the Mexico Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center.

Border-patrol officials came to the same conclusion and sought out preexisting, tested technology. The new approach, announced in 2011, would combine proven mobile surveillance, thermal imaging, and tower-mounted video technology. The request for IFT proposals called for sensors able to detect "a single, walking, average-sized adult" and provide sufficiently high-resolution video of that adult at a range of up to 7.5 miles in daylight and darkness.

The biggest defense contractors—including General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon—all competed for the $145 million contract, which was awarded to Elbit Systems of America, the Fort Worth, Texas–based subsidiary of Israel's Elbit Systems. Elbit has deployed hundreds of miles of border-monitoring systems between Israel and Palestine and also provided multisensor surveillance systems along Israel's border with Gaza and Egypt. As of July, Elbit had completed construction in Nogales, and in September it crossed a major hurdle when the IFT system, tested by border-security agents, demonstrated the capacity to detect, track, and classify movement on the border. In other words, it works. Elbit's system is so specific that it can determine whether an individual is carrying a backpack or a long-arm weapon.

WITH RADAR, DAY AND NIGHT CAMERAS, AND THERMAL IMAGING, THE NEW SYSTEM IS LIKE "TURNING ON A LIGHT SWITCH" ALONG THE DARK, MYSTERIOUS BORDER.

It's also designed to operate in the rugged Arizona desert. "Border control can break anything," says John Lawson, CBP acting section chief. "It's very difficult terrain to deploy technology in, and that's one of the benefits that we're anticipating. This system is going to be a lot more rugged than a lot of the previous things we've deployed." Now that the IFT has proved itself worthy, a second installation on the Arizona border is underway, with the ultimate plan of safeguarding the entire Mexico-facing stretch of Arizona's perimeter, pending congressional approval.

The IFT is only one part of the border patrol's effort to use technology to enhance security. The Arizona Border Surveillance Technology Plan, which includes the IFT, also uses remote video surveillance—day and night cameras for cluttered urban environments where radar is not as effective—and truck-mounted mobile sensors that can be moved when needed. Drones have been used to provide a bird's-eye view of vast stretches of border, and in 2012, the agency deployed a military wide-area camera attached to an aerostat, an airship tethered up to 5,000 feet off the ground. Originally used in Afghanistan, these cameras are capable of capturing miles of terrain in a single hi-res image. But officials say that all of the technology, including the IFT system, serves only to support the most valuable assets border patrol has: the agents. "Back in the early days, it was people looking for footprints on the ground," Lawson says. "We still do that." Only now, the agents stand a better chance of finding them.

With radar, day and night cameras, and thermal imaging, the new system is like "turning on a light switch" along the dark, mysterious border.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/tec...trol-integrated-towers-system-invisible-wall/
 
.
Israel's Elbit Systems Wins £87m Contract on US-Mexico Border Fence

israel-wall-apartheid-mexico-palestine-united-states-construction.jpg

Israeli soldiers patrol the border with the northern Gaza Strip during a drill near Netiv HaasaraReuters
Israeli company Elbit Systems, the largest supplier to the Israeli military, has been awarded a $87m contract from the US Department of Homeland Security to produce and install surveillance systems for the US-Mexico border fence.

Why advertise with us
The contract is for an unspecified number of observation posts to be built along the US-Mexico border fence in the area of Nogales, south of Tuscon.

Elbit Systems was involved in the West Bank wall separating the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Israel. The company provides "intrusion detection systems" and infrastructure support for the barrier.

Arizona's Republican senator John McCain said: "Arizonans have been waiting more than a decade for the Department of Homeland Security to place the needed technology along our border to support the Border Patrol and fully secure our southern border.

"After many months of delay, the awarding of this contract to Elbit Systems is an important development toward fully securing the border in Arizona. These Integrated Fixed Towers in southern Arizona will give our agents the ability to detect, evaluate and respond to all illegal entries crossing our border."

Elbit Systems is the Israeli military's largest supplier of drones, military technology and surveillance. Its drones are described on its website as "the backbone of the Israel Defence Force's UAS [unmanned aerial system] force". They have been used on Palestinian civilians in strikes on Gaza.

As part of its US tender, Elbit said that Homeland Security needed to "adopt a more complete border security system, which combines radar and electro-optical sensors, unattended ground sensors, unmanned air systems, and manned or unmanned ground vehicles to enhances agents' flexibility and responsiveness".

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/israels-elbit-systems-wins-87m-contract-us-mexico-border-fence-1439378



Better Than a Wall: A New Detection System Can Help Monitor the U.S.-Mexico Border

The Integrated Towers System promises to give border-control agents more insight into the threats they face before they face them. And it's only the beginning.


Steve Craft
By Mitch Moxley
Jan 28, 2016

  • 419
Agent Jose Verdugo's workplace is vast: 1,100 square miles of hilly, sandy terrain surrounding Nogales, Arizona, the second-largest border-patrol station in the country. Depending on the day's assignment, he'll hike trails or drive along the boundary between the United States and Mexico. Some days he investigates human trafficking or drug smuggling. (Half of the marijuana that crosses the southwest border is captured in the Tucson sector, where Nogales is situated.) Other days Verdugo investigates a suspicious blip on a radar system that often turns out to be foul weather, or a rancher tending his land, or a stray cow.


Over the years, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has used a series of strategies, some more effective than others, to monitor huge swaths of rugged terrain along the border. It needed a solution that would prevent agents like Verdugo from being deployed for false alarms, so they could chase and investigate narcos rather than livestock and be prepared for what they encountered when they caught up. This would require permanent sensors that could provide a clear picture to agents back at the station of what was happening in the field. The Integrated Fixed Towers (IFT) system, which includes radar and day and night cameras mounted on a series of towers along the border, promises to solve the problem. The radar and cameras transmit data over microwave link to the Nogales station, where agents determine an appropriate course of action. The system, which enables agents to accurately monitor areas previously unobserved, is, Verdugo says, like "turning on a light switch" along the dark, mysterious border.

The IFT is only the latest of the government's attempts to cover the southwestern border with sensors capable of detecting unlawful crossings. The previous setup, known as SBInet, was a network of newly designed radar, cameras, and heat and motion detectors, which was supposed to allow border-patrol agents to work from a common operational picture. Boeing won the contract in 2006, and the system was initiated across 53 miles of Arizona's Mexico border.

gallery-1454016611-border-2.jpg

Steve Craft
It quickly became a boondoggle. Total acquisition costs rose to a projected $1.6 billion, a staggering $1.4 billion more than initial estimated costs, according to the Government Accountability Office. It also didn't really work. The main problem was communication—the information transmitted to the command center was unreliable. It didn't operate well in the varied terrain of the Tucson sector, and was often triggered by bad weather, leading to false positives. In 2010, as costs rose, then Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano halted the program and asked border patrol to start over. "One of the lessons of SBInet was you're better off going small than big, and you're better off going off-the-shelf than innovative," says Christopher Wilson, a border-security expert and deputy director of the Mexico Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center.

Border-patrol officials came to the same conclusion and sought out preexisting, tested technology. The new approach, announced in 2011, would combine proven mobile surveillance, thermal imaging, and tower-mounted video technology. The request for IFT proposals called for sensors able to detect "a single, walking, average-sized adult" and provide sufficiently high-resolution video of that adult at a range of up to 7.5 miles in daylight and darkness.

The biggest defense contractors—including General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon—all competed for the $145 million contract, which was awarded to Elbit Systems of America, the Fort Worth, Texas–based subsidiary of Israel's Elbit Systems. Elbit has deployed hundreds of miles of border-monitoring systems between Israel and Palestine and also provided multisensor surveillance systems along Israel's border with Gaza and Egypt. As of July, Elbit had completed construction in Nogales, and in September it crossed a major hurdle when the IFT system, tested by border-security agents, demonstrated the capacity to detect, track, and classify movement on the border. In other words, it works. Elbit's system is so specific that it can determine whether an individual is carrying a backpack or a long-arm weapon.

WITH RADAR, DAY AND NIGHT CAMERAS, AND THERMAL IMAGING, THE NEW SYSTEM IS LIKE "TURNING ON A LIGHT SWITCH" ALONG THE DARK, MYSTERIOUS BORDER.

It's also designed to operate in the rugged Arizona desert. "Border control can break anything," says John Lawson, CBP acting section chief. "It's very difficult terrain to deploy technology in, and that's one of the benefits that we're anticipating. This system is going to be a lot more rugged than a lot of the previous things we've deployed." Now that the IFT has proved itself worthy, a second installation on the Arizona border is underway, with the ultimate plan of safeguarding the entire Mexico-facing stretch of Arizona's perimeter, pending congressional approval.

The IFT is only one part of the border patrol's effort to use technology to enhance security. The Arizona Border Surveillance Technology Plan, which includes the IFT, also uses remote video surveillance—day and night cameras for cluttered urban environments where radar is not as effective—and truck-mounted mobile sensors that can be moved when needed. Drones have been used to provide a bird's-eye view of vast stretches of border, and in 2012, the agency deployed a military wide-area camera attached to an aerostat, an airship tethered up to 5,000 feet off the ground. Originally used in Afghanistan, these cameras are capable of capturing miles of terrain in a single hi-res image. But officials say that all of the technology, including the IFT system, serves only to support the most valuable assets border patrol has: the agents. "Back in the early days, it was people looking for footprints on the ground," Lawson says. "We still do that." Only now, the agents stand a better chance of finding them.

With radar, day and night cameras, and thermal imaging, the new system is like "turning on a light switch" along the dark, mysterious border.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/tec...trol-integrated-towers-system-invisible-wall/
Well then. It's good if they're going to monitor border, drug and sex trafficking should be curbed.

One more question... will the walls be opaque and as high as the ones in Israel.
 
.
Israel's Elbit Systems Wins £87m Contract on US-Mexico Border Fence
US needs to help that almost non-existent dumb entity called Israel. But, here the question is why India, a self proclaimed super power of Asia, should buy the similar purchase from that dummy entity?
 
. . .
Sara duniar manus rapistani bole chene kintu kangloor mollara identity crisis nie bhooge..Sara dunia ke bol Islam k log ki bol chene r Muhammad ke chilo.Buje jaabi k asol rapistani r k asol rapist r follower.Indian der reputation r moollar reputation r hasas na.:rofl:
Kangloo Hindu nie ja iche bol.Amaar baal ta chera jai..
Ebar loongi tule halka moote sue poro baal na boke
@The Eagle @waz @Oscar @Horus @WAJsal permanent Ban
 
. . . .
BSF director general said the pilot projects put under trial are by the way of 'proof of concept' method, where an experiment determines if a concept for a particular task is feasible or not
India is deploying along its border with Bangladesh a smart Israel-developed barbed wire system having a ‘quick response team’ mechanism which strikes when the CCTV-powered control room detects an infiltration attempt.

Indian Border Security Force (BSF) is implementing an ambitious project called the comprehensive integrated border management system (CIBMS) as part of the ruling BJP’s plan to completely seal the India-Bangladesh and Indo-Pak borders in the next few years.

The BSF is tasked with guarding the over 6,300km long two borders and its chief, in an interview to PTI, said the new frontier guarding systems will bring a “sea change”, for the first time, in this domain.

“There is going to be a paradigm shift in our operational preparedness. As of now, we patrol from point-A to point-B (along the border). What we are now planning is to shift to a QRT (quick reaction team)-based system and a number of new technologies which have not been tried so far are being tested,” said KK Sharma, the Director General of BSF.

Sharma explained how the new border guarding mechanism, first along the “volatile” Pakistan border and then at the Indo-Bangla frontier, will work.

“The new equipment and technologies will be integrated and a feed, from CCTV cameras, will go to the border out post where there is a monitor installed.

“This will be monitored round-the-clock by two or three men. Now, we have softwares which are in a position to detect any intrusion or any change in the scenario and create an alarm,” he said.

“An automatic alarm will indicate the exact place where this intrusion (at the border) is taking place or an attempt is being made or something is being seen.

“Once we get the alarm, we will zoom our night vision cameras on that and when we come to know what is happening, we will be able to neutralise the threat. This is the idea,” Sharma added.

The BSF, raised in 1965 for border guarding roles, is running two pilot projects of 5km each in Jammu in this context and this, Sharma said, will subsequently be set up at four more porous patches: One each along the Indo-Pak IB in Punjab and Gujarat and one each at Tripura, West Bengal and Dhubri (Assam) along the Indo-Bangla border.

The director general said the pilot projects put under trial are by the way of ‘proof of concept’ method, where an experiment determines if a concept for a particular task is feasible or not.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom