What's new

India to host Dalai Lama in disputed territory, defying China

abrar khan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
463
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Chinese Foreign Ministry warns the Dalai Lama's trip to "South Tibet" would cause serious damage to India-China ties.

Indian federal government representatives will meet the Dalai Lama when he visits a sensitive border region controlled by India but claimed by China, officials said, despite a warning from Beijing that it would damage ties.

India says the Tibetan spiritual leader will make a religious trip to Arunachal Pradesh next month, and as a secular democracy it would not stop him from travelling to any part of the country.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration is raising its public engagement with the Tibetan leader, a change from earlier governments' reluctance to anger Beijing by sharing a public platform with him.

"It's a behavioural change you are seeing. India is more assertive," junior home minister Kiren Rijiju told Reuters in an interview.

Rijiju, who is from Arunachal and is Modi's point man on Tibetan issues, said he would meet the Dalai Lama, who is visiting the Buddhist Tawang monastery after an eight-year interval.

"He is going there as a religious leader, there is no reason to stop him. His devotees are demanding he should come, what harm can he do? He is a lama."

The Chinese Foreign Ministry said on Friday the Dalai Lama's trip would cause serious damage to India-China ties, and warned New Delhi not to provide him a platform for anti-China activities.

"The Dalai clique has for a long time carried out anti-China separatist activities and on the issue of the China-India border has a history of disgraceful performances," spokesman Geng Shuang told a daily news briefing.

China investing nearby
Visits of the Dalai Lama are initiated months, if not years in advance, and approval for the April 4-13 trip predates recent disagreements between the neighbours.

But the decision to go ahead at a time of strained relations signals Modi's readiness to use diplomatic tools at a time when China's economic and political clout across South Asia is growing.

China is helping to fund the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, and has also invested in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, raising fears of strategic encirclement.

Last month a Taiwanese parliamentary delegation visited Delhi, angering Beijing, which regards Taiwan as an integral part of China.

In December, President Pranab Mukherjee hosted the Dalai Lama at his official residence with other Nobel prize winners, the first public meeting with an Indian head of state in 60 years.

Some officials said India's approach to the Tibetan issue remained cautious, reflecting a gradual evolution in policy rather than a sudden shift, and Modi appears reluctant to go too far for fear of upsetting its large northern neighbour.

India's foreign secretary, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, was in Beijing last week on a visit that analysts said was aimed at stabilising relations between the world's most populous countries.

Tangible shift
That said, Modi's desire to pursue a more assertive foreign policy since his election in 2014 was quickly felt in contacts with China.

At one bilateral meeting early in his tenure, Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj asked her Chinese counterpart whether Beijing had a "one India" policy, according to a source familiar with India-China talks, a pointed reference to Beijing's demand that countries recognise its "one China" policy.

"One India" would imply that China recognise India's claims to Kashmir, contested by Pakistan, as well as border regions like Arunachal Pradesh.

India's hosting of the Dalai Lama since he fled to India in 1959 after a failed uprising against Chinese rule has long irritated Beijing. But government ministers often shied away from regular public meetings with the Buddhist monk.

"These meetings were happening before. Now it is public," Lobsang Sangay, head of the Tibetan government-in-exile based in the Indian town of Dharamsala, said in an interview.

"I notice a tangible shift. With all the Chinese investments in all the neighbouring countries, that has generated debate within India," he said.

The chief minister of Arunachal Pradesh, a member of Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, met the Dalai Lama in New Delhi in October and officially invited him to visit the state.

On the Dalai Lama's last visit in 2009, the state's chief minister met him. This time he will be joined by federal minister Rijiju, a move the Chinese may see as giving the trip an official imprimatur.

New Delhi has been hurt by China's refusal to let it join the Nuclear Suppliers Group, the global cartel that controls nuclear commerce.

India has also criticised Beijing for stonewalling its request to add the head of a banned Pakistani militant group to a UN Security Council blacklist.

Rory Medcalf, Head of the National Security College at the Australian National University, said New Delhi appeared to have been surprised by China's inflexibility since Modi came to power, fuelling distrust in the Indian security establishment.

"India does feel that the cards are stacked against it and that it should retain and play the cards that it does have," he said.

"The Dalai Lama and Tibetan exile community is clearly one of those cards."

China claims the state in the eastern Himalayas as "South Tibet", and has denounced foreign and even Indian leaders' visits to the region as attempts to bolster New Delhi's territorial claims.

A trip by the Dalai Lama, whom the Chinese regard as a dangerous separatist, would ratchet up tensions at a time when New Delhi is at odds with China on strategic and security issues and unnerved by Beijing's growing ties with arch-rival Pakistan.
 
.
India being a secular country should also allow Leaders of Huriyat conference of IOK to move around the world inclusive Pakistan.
 
. .
India being a secular country should also allow Leaders of Huriyat conference of IOK to move around the world inclusive Pakistan.
Lol...they are free to go anywhere!!
The moment they visit Pakistan....!! All bets will be off!! And we can get rid of them without any international backlash!! They know that...they wouldn't dare!
I wish they visit Pakistan!!
On topic why is endless Chinese whining? Anybody can visit arunachal!!
You guys better concentrate on island building in scs!
 
. . . .
Only China can consider Nobel Peace Laureate Dalai Lama as dangerous separatists and Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar as Saints.
For you Brahmdag Bughti is saint and Huryat leaders of IOK are separatist. What a hypocrisy? Then you people should stop crying in front of UN.
 
.
India being a secular country should also allow Leaders of Huriyat conference of IOK to move around the world inclusive Pakistan.

To some extent I agree with you...Nothing wrong with it...I have a respect for Hurriyat leaders like Yasin Mullick and Lone. They are good leaders.
 
.
Lol...they are free to go anywhere!!
The moment they visit Pakistan....!! All bets will be off!! And we can get rid of them without any international backlash!! They know that...they wouldn't dare!
I wish they visit Pakistan!!
On topic why is endless Chinese whining? Anybody can visit arunachal!!
You guys better concentrate on island building in scs!

Thank you, your answer is enough for understanding how much secular you Indians are?
https://www.dawn.com/news/140979
http://www.rferl.org/a/india-warns-pakistan-against-meeting-with-kashmiri-separatists/27202555.html

To some extent I agree with you...Nothing wrong with it...I have a respect for Hurriyat leaders like Yasin Mullick and Lone. They are good leaders.
I am thankful to you for understanding the importance of political solution of Kashmir which is better for the future of both nation.
 
.
Thank you, your answer is enough for understanding how much secular you Indians are?
https://www.dawn.com/news/140979
http://www.rferl.org/a/india-warns-pakistan-against-meeting-with-kashmiri-separatists/27202555.html


I am thankful to you for understanding the importance of political solution of Kashmir which is better for the future of both nation.

You are welcome...I think India as a nation is maturing enough in each phase...We can not be hostage of the past for ever...That is why, i hope that in order to bring sanity of our relationship, India and Pakistan should maintain some distance and ignore each other for some time so that politician do not use the relationship as a diplomatic tool to fool their respective audiences.

In India many people understand the criticality of Kashmir issue...If Hurriyat can make themselves more secular than just talking about Islamic Kashmir, then at least some section of Indian politics can accomdate them. Otherwise, the status quo will continue.
 
.
You are welcome...I think India as a nation is maturing enough in each phase...We can not be hostage of the past for ever...That is why, i hope that in order to bring sanity of our relationship, India and Pakistan should maintain some distance and ignore each other for some time so that politician do not use the relationship as a diplomatic tool to fool their respective audiences.

In India many people understand the criticality of Kashmir issue...If Hurriyat can make themselves more secular than just talking about Islamic Kashmir, then at least some section of Indian politics can accomdate them. Otherwise, the status quo will continue.
congress is a true secular party, but BJP and other Hindu religious political parties are the winner and ruling the india for last more than one and half decades show casing the present india face ruled by the parties they have selected means no more secularism.
How can you expect Kashmiri leaders to be secular while representing the muslims of Kashmir? Solution has to be provided in same premises.
 
.
congress is a true secular party, but BJP and other Hindu religious political parties are the winner and ruling the india for last more than one and half decades show casing the present india face ruled by the parties they have selected means no more secularism.
How can you expect Kashmiri leaders to be secular while representing the muslims of Kashmir? Solution has to be provided in same premises.

Makes sense...for your knowledge, i feel my self as a proud Hindu who respect RSS. You can blame me as much you want. No issues. But trust me, if any point of time, Kashmir issue will be resolved, it will be done by Gov where BJP will be at majority. If Kashmir can not be resolved with Modi like PM at the helm, i do not see any solution in any near future. This is unfortunately the truth of the current situation.

To answer your question, if Kashmir leaders do not respect any strong Hindu leader then how can you expect that a nation of Hindu majority people will respect the sentiment of Muslim majority states...Respects are earned when both parties respect each other sentiment....
 
.
For you Brahmdag Bughti is saint and Huryat leaders of IOK are separatist. What a hypocrisy? Then you people should stop crying in front of UN.

Both the separatist crowd accepts they are separatists; does Pakistan accept Hafeez Saeed and fellow sobs are terrorists?
 
.
For you Brahmdag Bughti is saint and Huryat leaders of IOK are separatist. What a hypocrisy? Then you people should stop crying in front of UN.
Hurriyat leaders are, off course, separatists, when did we say they are not? Brahmdagh Bugti and Dalai Lama are seeking freedom for their nations Balochistan and Tibet respectively but Hurriyat leaders are not seeking freedom for J&K, they rather want the J&K to merge with Pakistan.
Dalai Lama is a saint and definitely not "dangerous" as claimed by China.
Hurriyat leaders are definitely not saint, they incite violence.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom