kaykay
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 8,933
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
the point is-ARE YOU FEELING SAFE?
for most Chinese,we feel very SAFE no matter how many troops you deploy there.
yes I am feeling safe!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the point is-ARE YOU FEELING SAFE?
for most Chinese,we feel very SAFE no matter how many troops you deploy there.
the point is-ARE YOU FEELING SAFE?
for most Chinese,we feel very SAFE no matter how many troops you deploy there.
congrats,but most your people and govt dont,or else your govt don't have to add troops to the border year by year.yes I am feeling safe!!
congrats,but most your people and govt dont,or else your govt don't have to add troops to the border year by year.
tell you one more truth:we have VERY FEW PLA soldiers along China_India border.most soldiers you saw from medias are armed police with no heavy weapons.
India can airlift large numbers of troops.
Remember any large sacle troop mobilization by china will be detected by satellites.
The bombing their infrastructure part is after the war true,but u have to supply 30 divisions in mountanous territory its nightmare,and without railways impossible.Static railway network is easy target for PGM or brahmos.
Plus atm as air forces go,IAF has advantage over plaaf in the tibet region scenario as most plaaf aircarft/awacs are unsuited for high altitude aircarft and lack advanced recon capability.
^^The original plan was to strengthen Indian position along Sino-India border with 90,000 soldiers including mountain corps
May be another divisions consisting of rest 50,000 soldiers will follow over coming years
Detected by US satellites and in any case India would get full support of the US logistics, communications system and weaponry. US weaponry is growing in the Indian arsenal. If India has been under embargo like China, the Indian army would be zero with same fire power as the Malvives army, no C 17, no P 8 Poseidon, no satellite etc......only Mig 21.
Detected by US satellites and in any case India would get full support of the US logistics, communications system and weaponry. US weaponry is growing in the Indian arsenal. If India has been under embargo like China, the Indian army would be zero with same fire power as the Malvives army, no C 17, no P 8 Poseidon, no satellite etc......only Mig 21.
Detected by US satellites and in any case India would get full support of the US logistics, communications system and weaponry. US weaponry is growing in the Indian arsenal. If India has been under embargo like China, the Indian army would be zero with same fire power as the Malvives army, no C 17, no P 8 Poseidon, no satellite etc......only Mig 21.
Why not? - we got china to roll back its tent without mobilising one soldier.
Strength lies in a heavy capability, so powerful that you never need to use it.
We didn't mobilise a single soldier, but china got a plain message that the tent has to go.
This wouldn't have been the case, if the we didn't have the capability to give a befitting reply.
Hence, capability gives deterrence, and deterrence brings peace... which is a vital and noble objective.
We need to deploy couple of regiments of light tanks in the Indo-China border.
They do not want to threat Chinese but to safeguard the real treasure which also to be considered as ours.India has sent 400 million soldiers are not used, 40000 wanted to threaten Chinese, Indians low IQ ah.
India has sent 400 million soldiers are not used, 40000 wanted to threaten Chinese, Indians low IQ ah.
They do not want to threat Chinese but to safeguard the real treasure which also to be considered as ours.
You speak about price we should pay,that's the point.You are the only Chinese on this forum, who admits the truth. I admire you.
The truth is China is the loser. The actual reason is that the greatest enemy to China is Chinese themselves.
Chinese are patriotic but they are also traitors. This is an irony but a fact of life.
Secondly, Chinese want everything like others but they are not ready to pay the price all the time unlike others.
In the Chinese mind, there is always the tendency to go shortcut. Not all can be achieved through shortcut.