Mughal-Prince
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,523
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
I am wondering ... Who's going to have his hands cut this time ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is simple, isn't it?
When you talk of IVC, it is suddenly about modern geography. Many of you claim (erroneously) that IVC was in modern Pakistani territory and is therefor exclusive Pakistani history. Even though Pakistan obviously separated due to Islam and Islam had nothing to do with the IVC.
When it comes to Mughals and these monuments etc., suddenly you claim they were Muslims and therefore you are their inheritors.
Fact is: you guys are mostly converts and have nothing to do with those invaders.
Leave my personal professional life to me, You dont need to be explained of it either. I have spoken out based upon this thread, interestingly you have thanked it too...
http://www.defence.pk/forums/current-events-social-issues/89079-thousand-years-old-cultural-heritage-pride-pakistan.html
Yes we are converts, why is your a@@ on fire. Didnt I tell you to lay of this personal insults. My religion is my personal matter, you go and drink the cow P!ss that you guys love to enjoy. See 2 can play this game too. As far as IVC goes I really dont give a second though to what some people did 3-4000 years ago. So cry me a river.
I don't care about your religion, what matters is your trying to "inherit the mantle" of the Mughals or other invaders that is obviously foolish if you are a convert.
And no, I am not interested in digging up any hadhith about camel piss and who recommended that, none of my business.
There was never any personal insult. Can't help if one still manages to find it.
It was build by a Mughal king based on Persian and Turkish, and Islamic Architecture, with a hind of south Asian influence in it.
^^It is you who brought the religious issue. I think it never had anything to do with religion.
It can cut both ways you see.
And vinod next time dont come and comment about Pakistan at all, as you cant take a simple criticism, of a building being build in india by Pakistanis, and yet you guys always take liberty of running your mouth about Pakistan. So remember it next time.
Religion where calling it influenced by Islamic architecture, seriously, seriously, you need a brain chk.
I have politely answered to your points. Never took it personally. Suggest you do the same.
You did imply that the "Islamic architecture" (not sure if there is an architecture specified in "Islam") somehow took away from it's being Indian.
And you don't get personal, if I need a check, I will get it.
This is what I had meant by Islamic Architecture.
Islamic architecture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Google can be your best friend if you chose him so.
Thanks but it is mostly the architecture of places where Islam spread. There is no Architecture mandated in the Islamic scriptures AFAIK.
The term is misleading.
No offence but seriously hindu architecture sucks......... building is ugliest of it's kind. Maybe internal features look better.
---------- Post added at 07:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:14 PM ----------
space station......... can't stop laughing
Funny to see the inferiority complex of some converts.
Conversion (even forced) itself is one thing, losing one's identity and becoming a permanent slaves to the invaders who were nothing more than glorified bandits and barbaric marauders is another.
Taj was built by Indians and is a proof of Indian genius. The Mughals from Akbar onwards were a product of the soil of India and were only Indians. They even had Indian blood after Akbar.
Some Pakistani converts want to feel good that their ancestors were ruled by foreigners for a thousand years, the truth is far from it.
ive been to Taj but nothing compares to the Jain temples of Mount Abu the inside detail is out this world!
No there is not, but the Muslim architects who went to these places, also added the touch of their own, Part Arab part borrowed by other areas. So rather then mentioning that its Arab. Persian, Turkish, Scandinavian, Roman, Spanish or so many other things it can be termed as Islamic Architecture.