What's new

India to back UN on action against Syria

My take on this issue- Congress dosent want to loose their numerically greater sunni vote bank even if it may cost them shia votes
 
. .
and the wider truth of khurshid is this

pls read

"Salman Khurshid appeared for Students Islamic Movement of India, a group banned in India and frequently charged by Indian authorities with terrorist activities, as its defence lawyer, appealing the 2002 ban; in June 2006 the Supreme Court of India rejected the appeal noting "the appeal against the ban should be first argued before the tribunal established for the purposes". Asked about his appearance, Khurshid said :"I would refuse a client only when I am personally satisfied that taking up the case would go against the ethics of the profession. A lawyer has to appear for an accused. It is my constitutional duty. A party and the government too cannot pre-judge an organisation."[4]

In 2009, incumbent president Sirajuddin Qureshi beat Salman Khurshid for the presidency of India Islamic Cultural Centre.[5] Campaign for the election was very intense which became high-profile with Khurshid's entry in the fray.[6]"

I mean now this man is foreign minister of india??!! i am totally ashamed

AND ULTIMATELY THE SAME SIMI became basis for indian mujahideen!!
 
. . .
wont make any difference, India's opinion hardly influences the world affairs! Even if the members of UNSC neither China nor Russia have prevented any WAR envisaged by the US!

hello narghis...........u were great in madras cafe:smitten:
 
.
India supporting or not supporting have 0 effects on any of the things happening now or what is gonna happen later in Syria.
 
.
No one(Indian Muslims) is bothered whats happening in syria.many of them even wont know whats happening there.

people are aware of everything.....the urdu dailies always spice up stuff

India supporting or not supporting have 0 effects on any of the things happening now or what is gonna happen later in Syria.

But it impacts the diplomatic relations based on side u take
 
. .
He is Indian afterall.:lol:

He is saying now that thread was of Su30 but before in same thread said to me twice that its Mig29 thread:omghaha:



just shut up man and don't waste anyone's time here.............u said ur interest was geopolitics??

Now this thread is all about it and u have nothing to add................as usual u are just a troll:omghaha:

Good now yr saying dont waste my time to me:omghaha:
 
.
In return for backing US, Obama might actually let India use Brahmos against Syria. This will give Indians here more chance to brag while hiding the fact that Rupee will cross 70 per USD.



Soon, India will allow US to place bases in Indian territories.


Are you idiot or something else
Read the article it says

Republic of India will support a UN action NOT A US ACTION you idiot
& since China & Russia will veto everything
This means we will not support Military Intervention in SYRIA

Just read something before farting
 
. .
Though India's support or opposition to attacks has no effect on this issue....I think it should start working on becoming a global player by actually taking a side!
 
. .
Though India's support or opposition to attacks has no effect on this issue....I think it should start working on becoming a global player by actually taking a side!


How does that benefit us? we are already a global player and part of the G20 and BRIC BTW India's stance is not much difference to that of Pakistan's they also have said they will respect the UN findings and outcome.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom