India third largest economy by 2028: CEBR

[INDIC]

I already posted the factual answer. If you have trouble with comprehend, it's not my responsibility to tutor you.

You posted what existed at three points of time 221BC, 1912, 1949 without explaining if a united China with a strong central government always existed in between.

 

[Fattyacids]

You posted what existed at three points of time 221BC, 1912, 1949 without explaining if a united China with a strong central government always existed in between.

I posted a simple answer yet you can't even find and read properly. PISA is important

 

[BJP*]

There was only ONE emperor of the empire regardless the power struggle during transitional period. One empire, one son of the heaven concept never changed.

There is only one recognized central government. Rebel or rival political party are not government.

You can't argue against established historical facts, no matter how you fabricate or spin your question. This is not India, we are not your average Indians.

India was also ruled by emperors such as Emperor Ashoka, Akbar, etc. No one say emperor in north is this... and in south was this....

however there were smaller kingdoms existed who were governed by kings and queens such as king of Kalinga, queen of Jhasi. They were never called Emperor of Kalinga and Empress of Jhasi.

No, you lied. What can this forum expect from a pathological liar and a brainless troll?

Qin dynasty 221 BC - 206 BC
18 Kingdoms fall under Qin dynasty, there was only ONE emperor. It was a period of a power struggle to be successor of the throne..

The successor of Qin dynasty is Han dynasty 206 BC - 220 AD

Han Dynasty


Any university history book will tell you China was unified in 221 BC, even Japan was unified in 660BC. India was formed only in 1947, by gaining independent from the British.

Take your dumb fabrication of history to your Bollywood forum, this is a defense forum with high standard.


China
Formation
- Unification of China under the Qin Dynasty221 BC
- Republic established1 January 1912
- People's Republic proclaimed1 October 1949


Japan
Formation
- National Foundation Day11 February 660 BC
- Meiji Constitution29 November 1890
- Current constitution3 May 1947

India
Independence from the United Kingdom
- Dominion15 August 1947
- Republic26 January 1950


The World Factbook

The World Factbook

when you give links you should study what is written in them.
Open the Link, Click on "Introduction of India". Read the third line which states "The Maurya Empire of the 4th and 3rd centuries B.C. - which reached its zenith under ASHOKA - united much of South Asia."


Where as For china it is no where written that it was ever united. It is not even united today. Mainland claim taiwan and Taiwan claim mainland as china. qouting for you what is written in the link provided by you for china

For centuries China stood as a leading civilization, outpacing the rest of the world in the arts and sciences, but in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the country was beset by civil unrest, major famines, military defeats, and foreign occupation. After World War II, the communists under MAO Zedong established an autocratic socialist system that, while ensuring China's sovereignty, imposed strict controls over everyday life and cost the lives of tens of millions of people. After 1978, MAO's successor DENG Xiaoping and other leaders focused on market-oriented economic development and by 2000 output had quadrupled. For much of the population, living standards have improved dramatically and the room for personal choice has expanded, yet political controls remain tight. Since the early 1990s, China has increased its global outreach and participation in international organizations.

 

[Fattyacids]

India was also ruled by emperors such as Emperor Ashoka, Akbar, etc. No one say emperor in north is this... and in south was this....

however there were smaller kingdoms existed who were governed by kings and queens such as king of Kalinga, queen of Jhasi. They were never called Emperor of Kalinga and Empress of Jhasi.


when you give links you should study what is written in them.
Open the Link, Click on "Introduction of India". Read the third line which states "The Maurya Empire of the 4th and 3rd centuries B.C. - which reached its zenith under ASHOKA - united much of South Asia."

Maurya empire ended around 185 BC. From 185 BC to 1850, that's 2000 years in total, there was not a single sovereign empire. You cannot have 10 kings and 20 emperors, and called yourself one empire.

Not disputing that Indian subcontinent or South Asia history goes back a long way, but it was never one country. Present day India and its border are created by British.

 

[BJP*]

Maurya empire ended around 185 BC. From 185 BC to 1850, that's 2000 years in total, there was not a single sovereign empire. You cannot have 10 kings and 20 emperors, and called yourself one empire.

No one is deny India subcontinent or South Asia has a long history, but it was never one country.

Yes only one empire existed at any given time. Even in your post you missed the moghul empires. Ever heard about Akbar the Great?
What will you call the empire? Is it not substitute to country?

 

[Fattyacids]

Yes only one empire existed at any given time. Even in your post you missed the moghul empires. Ever heard about Akbar the Great?
What will you call the empire? Is it not substitute to country?

Mughals were foreign invaders who Islamized most of South Asia (No different from the British) Two, was there a legitimate successor to Mughals when its power weaken? No, it was fragmented. Then British came. The land was lost again. How exactly was there a political continuity or country created by the descendants of Maurya empire? None.

 

[BJP*]

Mughals were foreign invaders who islamized most of South Asia. Two, was there a legitimate successor to Mughals power weaken? No. Then British came. The land was lost again. How exactly is there a political continuity or succession by the same people?

No, If mughals are foriegn invaders, so are the Aryans. You can not compare with mughals and britishers. Mughals were Indian emperors their capital was in India, all the policies were made within the boundaries. Most of the time since 300 BC the capital of India was not changed it remained 'Delhi'.

Where as britishers controlled Indian land from london. Actual decisons were made in Britain. So you can say India lost the status of country for about 120 years. But again 120 years are nothing when compared to thousands of years.

It is spectacle that you have not replied to my post when I stated that China is not unified even in present times!!!

 

[Fattyacids]

No, If mughals are foriegn invaders, so are the Aryans. You can not compare with mughals and britishers. Mughals were Indian emperors their capital was in India, all the policies were made within the boundaries. Most of the time since 300 BC the capital of India was not changed it remained 'Delhi'.

Where as britishers controlled Indian land from london. Actual decisons were made in Britain. So you can say India lost the status of country for about 120 years. But again 120 years are nothing when compared to thousands of years.

It is spectacle that you have not replied to my post when I stated that China is not unified even in present times!!!

There was no single empire known as India when Mughals ruled South Asia in Delhi. It was just indian subcontinent with a myriad of different kingdoms.
Even if I accept Mughals as Indian empire, there is no political continuity from Muarya empire. Mughals were muslims, completely culture and people to local south Asians.

How could India lost the status of a country to British? For 2000 years, since 185BC, there was not a single country/empire. The present border of India was drew by the British.

"One sovereign empire/one country" is completely different concept from "unified country"
There can only be an unification if there exists two different entities, like East and West Germany. Taiwan is not recognized by UN as a country. And it's size is not even 0.5% of China landmass.

 

[INDIC]

There was no country known as India when Mughals ruled South Asia in Delhi. It was just indian subcontinent. Even if I accept Mughals as Indian empire, there is no political continuity from Muarya empire. Mughals were muslims, completely culture and people to local south Asians.

How could India lost the status of a country? For 2000 years, since 185BC, there was not a single country/empire.

One sovereign empire or one country is completely different concept from unification.
Two, there is unification only if there exists two different entities, like East and West Germany. Taiwan is not recognized by UN as a country, and it's size is not even 0.5% of China landmass

Pot calling the Kettle black. tell us was China always united before 1950.

 

[illusion8]

There was no single empire known as India when Mughals ruled South Asia in Delhi. It was just indian subcontinent with a myriad of different kingdoms.
Even if I accept Mughals as Indian empire, there is no political continuity from Muarya empire. Mughals were muslims, completely culture and people to local south Asians.

How could India lost the status of a country to British? For 2000 years, since 185BC, there was not a single country/empire. The present border of India was drew by the British.

One sovereign empire or one country is completely different concept from "unified country"
Two, there can only be an unification only if there exists two different entities, like East and West Germany. Taiwan is not recognized by UN as a country, and it's size is not even 0.5% of China landmass

Save your breath - no one gives a FF what a Chinese has to say about India's history.

 

[Fattyacids]

Pot calling the Kettle black. tell us was China always united before 1950.

No, we were NOT colonized and our country was created by the British. Don't confused India with China.

From CIA world factbook
China
Formation
- Unification of China under the Qin Dynasty221 BC
- Republic established1 January 1912
- People's Republic proclaimed1 October 1949


India
Independence from the United Kingdom
- Dominion15 August 1947
- Republic26 January 1950

Save your breath - no one gives a FF what a Chinese has to say about India's history.

Really, but why so many indians quoting my posts?
Historical facts are facts. Learn to accept facts.

 

[illusion8]

Really, but why so many indians quoting my posts?
Historical facts are facts. Learn to accept facts.

They are just passing time and making a fool of you, seriously no one gives a cr@p about what you or your ilk think.

 

[Fattyacids]

They are just passing time and making a fool of you, seriously no one gives a cr@p about what you or your ilk think.

Sure they don't, but it goes on for 5 or 6 pages. How oxymoronic can one get, LOL.

 

[illusion8]

Sure they don't, but it goes on for 5 or 6 pages. How oxymoronic?

That's what happens when people have free time, you troll incessantly they troll back and the end result is cr@p as usual.

 

[Fattyacids]

That's what happens when people have free time, you troll incessantly they troll back and the end result is cr@p as usual.

You should trace back to see who started on this subject before pointing finger. But such common sense is not so common in most indian members here.