What's new

India & the market of war

Ambitious.Asian

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
789
Reaction score
0
The Indian military finds itself in the midst of a renaissance driven by induction of top-of-the-line weapon systems it had been lusting after for years. At a time when the western world is feeling the sharp edge of cuts in military spending, New Delhi is pumping billions of dollars into fighting machines such as stealth jets, aircraft carriers, nuke-powered submarines, submarine hunters and special operations aircraft.


Last week, one of most closely watched military deals in the world saw India picking French firm Dassault Aviation's Rafale over rival EADS Cassidian's Eurofighter Typhoon in a hotly contested contract worth $18 billion (Rs 90,000 crore) to supply 126 fighter jets to the air force, ending a 10-year excruciating hunt for advanced combat aircraft.

The Rafale will be the air force's leading combat plane for the next four decades. It, however, may be too early to crack open the bubbly. The initial lot of Rafale fighters will join the air force only in 2015-16. It could take up to a decade for the last Rafale to don air force colours. Former IAF chief Air Chief Marshal Fali Homi Major says: "Inducting a fleet of that size does take time. The Rafale will be a game-changer for the air force."

If the air force is on the cusp of a muscular transition, it's springtime for the Indian Navy too. India joined an exclusive club of five nations that operate nuclear powered submarines, with Russia handing over an Akula-2 class attack submarine to the navy in January. It was part of a 2004 deal worth $ 1 billion (R 5,000 crore). The US, the UK, Russia, France and China have nuclear-enabled submarines.

The navy has acquired the 'roving killer', now christened INS Chakra, on a 10-year lease. "It will allow us to train our men and hone their skills in operating strategic platforms after the Charlie-1 nuclear submarine leased from Russia was returned in 1991," says Vice Admiral Anup Singh (retd).

The induction of the indigenous nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine, INS Arihant, towards the end of this year, will be the crowning glory for the navy, completing India's nuclear triad or ability to launch strategic weapons from land, air and sea.

Arihant will be armed with K-15 ballistic missiles (a closely guarded DRDO secret), capable of delivering nuclear warheads up to 700 km, giving it enduring nuclear strike and counter-strike capabilities. Plans are afoot to build two more ballistic missile submarines to make the sea-based leg of India's deterrence more robust.

The navy will get high-end anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare capabilities next year as it begins replacing its ageing fleet of Soviet-era Tu-142s with Boeing P8I planes. India scooped out $2.1-billion (Rs 10,500 crore) from its coffers in January 2009 for eight such planes, which will shape the navy's air power beyond 2050. India will buy four more of these 'submarine hunter' planes.

Among the deals that will change the face of Indian military is a $30 billion (Rs 1,50,000 crore) deal with Russia for the joint development of the fifth generation fighter aircraft, one of the few stealth jet programmes in the world. India plans a fleet of 250-300 such fighters. India's defence spending leads to one unmistakable conclusion -- it wants to build military muscle without necessarily flexing it. New Delhi is expected to spend an estimated $150 billion (Rs 7,50,000 crore) over the next 10 years to keep its war machine well oiled.

The air force has never had it so good. It's modernising its heavy-lift capabilities with 10 Boeing C-17 Globemaster III aircraft worth $ 5.8 billion (Rs 29, 000 crore). Supporting rapid deployment of crack forces for intervening decisively, the C-130J Super Hercules aircraft promises to be a dependable force multiplier for the air force.

//Chinks in the armour//

India may have gone into an overdrive to multiply the lethality, flexibility and range of its military, but there are flanks that still need to be covered.

The army has not bought a single artillery gun since the Bofors scandal exploded in the late 1980s. The $4 billion (Rs 20,000 crore) artillery modernisation plan has been fraught with difficulties at every step of the process.

There's frustration in the army over delays in inducting almost 3,000 guns including towed artillery guns, ultralight howitzers and self-propelled tracked guns. Army chief Gen VK Singh's take: "India's arms procurement system is like a game of snakes and ladders. The difference being there are only snakes and no ladders… and you get bitten."

Only a handful of foreign vendors manufacture these systems. At least three such suppliers are on the defence ministry's watch-list over kickback allegations, limiting the ministry's buying options and creating a single-vendor situation -- a strict no-no under India's arms purchase policy.

"Other punitive measures need to be thought of. Blacklisting of vendors is proving to be counter-productive," argues Brig Gurmeet Kanwal (retd), who heads the Centre for Land Warfare Studies, a renowned defence think tank.

Mammoth military contracts inked by India in recent years are proof that it's aggressively building competencies for power projection and crisis response. But the basics appear to have been ignored.

A small but crucial deal to equip the air force with trainer aircraft has been mired in delays. Much to the air force's disgust, the Cabinet Committee on Security is yet to okay a $1 billion (Rs 5,000 crore) deal for buying 75 Pilatus trainer aircraft from Switzerland. The Pilatus will replace the HPT-32 trainer aircraft, grounded in 2009 after a fatal crash.

Deals hanging fire include attack helicopters and heavy-lift choppers for $ 2billion (Rs 10,000 crore), six midair refuellers worth $1 billion (Rs 5,000 crore) and the $650 million (Rs 3,250 crore) programme for 197 reconnaissance and surveillance choppers. Kanwal says, "The revolution in military affairs has passed India by. Now we are wrestling with the wake. Quick decision-making is the only answer."

Well, fire, but don't forget.




India & the market of war - Hindustan Times
 
.
Not only buying weapons but inventing them (that too, quickly) must be on the agendas of jernail sahibs, I hope they are thinking on similar lines
 
.
I believe the PC-7s are to be cleared at next CCS meet (whenever that is) and M-177 howitzers shouldn't be too far behind them. But seriously GoI/MoD need to pull their fingers out over artillery.
 
.
I just wish that the HTT-44 trainers come up ASAP and surprise the MOD before the PC-7s join. If LCH can come out in 3 years' record time, HTT-44 can come out too. :). It shouldn't be so complicated, considering that we've build 4.5th gen full-fledged Tejas, and a jet trainer the IJT-36 both of which should be joining the IAF in 1-2 years.

Guess we're the only nation working in reverse order. Other countries build basic aircraft first and then go for the big guns. We here build the big toys first and then go to basics. :lol:
 
.
I just wish that the HTT-44 trainers come up ASAP and surprise the MOD before the PC-7s join. If LCH can come out in 3 years' record time, HTT-44 can come out too. :). It shouldn't be so complicated, considering that we've build 4.5th gen full-fledged Tejas, and a jet trainer the IJT-36 both of which should be joining the IAF in 1-2 years.

Guess we're the only nation working in reverse order. Other countries build basic aircraft first and then go for the big guns. We here build the big toys first and then go to basics. :lol:

Not gonna happen my friend. It is easily possible for HAL/ADA to build the HTT-44 within 2 years (look at IJT, paper to flying product in record 22 months) but it is the testing phase that will take much longer and there will be some time after the intial 2 year period for the craft to achieve IOC and FOC to meet the IAF's exacting standards. It is for these reasons the IAF is looking to PC-7 as we can see these birds in India by 2013-.
 
.
^^^ As I say, IAF is the main culprit here, they don't seem to be firm on their specifications, ofocurse, changing them and re-inventing the entire plane again takes time and hence the delays, what the paperwallas print is only a one sided view, god knows what these people go through to keep up with IAF's tantrums :lol:
 
. . . .
if you notice its the army which is lacking in the modernization drive . the navy and the air force is far ahead.
 
.
^^^ As I say, IAF is the main culprit here, they don't seem to be firm on their specifications, ofocurse, changing them and re-inventing the entire plane again takes time and hence the delays, what the paperwallas print is only a one sided view, god knows what these people go through to keep up with IAF's tantrums :lol:

Then the government should enforce norms that once specs are set, IAF cannot change it and will have to induct. If this is not followed, then their yearly resolution should be pressed into buying Indian made stuff first (especially when it is a proven and successfully tested platform). If IAF refuses, deal with the top order the way corrupt officials are dealt with.

---------- Post added at 02:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:34 PM ----------

Heavy lift helly decision still has to done.
I will be pleased if IAF selects CHINOOK-47 :D

Mi-26T is far better in capabilities. It has totally digital control systems with LED displays and needs just 2 pilots to fly. What's more, we already have Mi-26 infrastructure in the country. BTW Mi-26s were deployed to carry out damaged Chinooks in Afghanistan. So you can imagine what its modernized version can do. :)
 
.
if you notice its the army which is lacking in the modernization drive . the navy and the air force is far ahead.

IA and IAF suffer from the same problem. They are intentionally indecisive so that no product gets established and they can keep buying foreign maal. Both should be enforced for acquire whatever successful platforms we have developed. IJT-36 was way ahead of its schedule until 2 years back. IAF didn't even respond properly to HAL, causing the program to go awry, apart from the infamous testing flight where the canopy flew off and the IJT fleet was grounded. Whose to blame for the derailing (if we leave the crash tests)?? IAF of course. Every jet crashes and encounters problems in testing phases.

This problem is there for IA also. Both lack maturity in terms of equipment acquisition management.
 
.
if you notice its the army which is lacking in the modernization drive . the navy and the air force is far ahead.

It's actually a sign that India is becoming a global power. An army is useful for fighting along the borders. But if you want to perform power projection, you need a proper air force and navy. At the current rate, the IAF might end up being the best air force in the world when the AMCA begins entering service.
 
. .
BTW, to whom India is going to destroy with these multi billion dollars weapons?
Who are u going to destroy with ur nuclear weapons?
India is only uping its defensive game as its aspirations grow.

once u invest in stuff u dont want others challenging ur investments do u?Thts modern warfare nowadays.
Anyways history is clear on how beneficial military innovation has been on improving civilian tech and lives.

Though i agree tht the focus should be more on indigenous tech ...but what India is focused on right now is fast capping our technological base by assimilating as much foreign tech as possible.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom