What's new

India tests long-range nuclear-capable Agni-III missile

.


All Indian Missiles and Agni ::

8022992cada10a40141fbe43d3bfb2b4.jpg


Agni Family [ The Vision ]


08be7f649d7091afaa537e5b9d989925.jpg


The more than 3,500-km range home-grown ballistic missile, believed to be most lethal of the weapon systems developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) scientists, was blasted at 10.50 hrs and covered the pre-designated range with 100 per cent accuracy, top officials told The Hindu from Wheeler Island soon after the successful launch.

When contacted, V.K. Saraswat, Scientific Advisor to Defence Minister and Director-General, DRDO, said it was a fantastic launch and a “hat-trick for Agni-III with three successes”. The trajectory went perfectly according to the plan till the last decimal place, and only mathematical people would understand the success, he said. “It gave us full range and pinpoint accuracy,” he added.

A.Sivathanu Pillai, CEO and MD, BrahMos Aerospace, called the success an “important milestone for the country. It will lead to induction of the missile”. The success would bring credit to DRDO scientists, he said.

A. Selvamurthy, Chief Controller, Life Sciences and Human Resources, DRDO also termed it as an “important milestone in developing the country's defence and developing the second strike capability. The flight proved the robustbness of all the systems and software”.

With the third consecutive success of Agni-III, he said “it is now a proven missile. It is a big morale booster for our missile scientists and institutions”, he observed.

Avinash Chander, Agni programme director and director, Advanced Systems Laboratory (ASL), called it a “perfect success”. Stating that all the mission objectives were met, he said all the events listed in the launch were executed with accuracy and described it as a “thrilling experience”.

A top DRDO missile technologist said the mission was a “good success and the trajectory of the flight was excellent. Everything worked well, including all payload systems”, he added.

Even though the missile did not carry a live warhead, its nuclear triggering mechanism worked well. Instead of a nuclear warhead, it carried chemical explosives, the missile technologist added.
 
.
.
Source for the above claim or else you are bullshitting, same will stand vaild for india-russia relationship.




another of your delusional crap. you are making fun out of yourself by floating in ridiculous statements like overpowering US ,By the way Russia is as good by itself as by cooperating with you.





:pakistan:


adios

Hey fella

I think you shud consider going thru
NTIP: Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)
 
.
.
here are some for you and your indigenous development,



http://www.npec-web.org/Testimonies...ology Transfers and Missile Proliferation.pdf


http://www.space4peace.org/actions/gnconf_09

indias%20move%20to%20space.htm


Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States

Global Network - Indias Move to Space Technology - 4/09



Indeed some one is bullshitting, or else missile technologies both cruse and ballistic and nuclear weapons have came from magic hat
and not from Russian factor:disagree:

what russia shared with india was space launch vehicle and not a missile. how dumb can people be? :hitwall:
if india had access to russia tech, we would be having 100s of ICBMs. We have the money and the good relation with russia. then care to tell me why its not selling us ICBMs?
and look at your missile arsenal, all chinese tech just renamed.
 
.
here are some for you and your indigenous development,



http://www.npec-web.org/Testimonies...ology Transfers and Missile Proliferation.pdf


http://www.space4peace.org/actions/gnconf_09

indias%20move%20to%20space.htm


Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States

Global Network - Indias Move to Space Technology - 4/09



Indeed some one is bullshitting, or else missile technologies both cruse and ballistic and nuclear weapons have came from magic hat
and not from Russian factor:disagree:


now if this jerk-off session is over, one would like to move back to the original topic.




:pakistan:

adios

If the Indian missiles technologies are transferred by Russia then how come it takes decades in development, R&D and not to mention several failures?

And if Pakistani missiles are the product of domestic R&D, then how come your missiles are developed overnight and without even a single failures?

Don't you want to suggest that Indians have not developed missiles successfully even with the help of the Russians.

And Pakistan is technology super power even USA have failures and takes time but your advance country makes missiles in no time without a single failure.
 
.
Source for the above claim or else you are bullshitting, same will stand vaild for india-russia relationship.




another of your delusional crap. you are making fun out of yourself by floating in ridiculous statements like overpowering US ,By the way Russia is as good by itself as by cooperating with you.





:pakistan:


adios

its not over powering USA it is US(INDIA):victory::rofl:
 
.
what russia shared with india was space launch vehicle and not a missile. how dumb can people be? :hitwall:
if india had access to russia tech, we would be having 100s of ICBMs. We have the money and the good relation with russia. then care to tell me why its not selling us ICBMs?

less, much less dumb then you who cannot read and come up with a more lousy argument,

More important, the Russian upper stage technology could be used to help India extend the range of its rockets to reach Beijing and to improve the accuracy of its missiles
If one had to identify the greatest drivers of missile proliferation,
Russia and China would surely lead the list. These two nations have
transferred missile technicians, critical missile parts and production
facilities to Iran, Brazil, North Korea, Syria, Pakistan, India and Iraq

while Russia has been able to transfer all manner
of military technology to China and India

White House spokesman Mike McCurry said that Washington was watching the situation carefully and raising US concerns to Moscow out of fear that such a missile could destablise South Asia.

The New York Times yesterday said that the missile, not yet tested, has a range of nearly 320 km and is meant to be launched from submerged submarines. The missile, which can strike deep into Pakistan, is named Sagarika, it said.

Sokolski noted that one Russian firm contracted with the
Indian Scientific Research Organization (ISRO) to sell cryogenic upper
stages to India, a transfer prohibited by the MTCR


India is developing a number of ballistic missiles from short range to those with ICBM-class capabilities, along with a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) and a short range, surface ship-launched system. India has the infrastructure to develop and produce these missiles. It is aggressively seeking technology from other states, particularly Russia

Russia is helping India to build a sea-launched ballistic missile that can carry a nuclear warhead and strike deep into Pakistan, say senior Clinton Administration officials, who fear the program will inflame simmering tensions in South Asia.


The assistance has continued for at least three years, the officials said, despite assurances from Russia that its scientists are not contributing restricted technology to India's missile programs.

Russia's sale of missiles and missile technology has been one of the more nettlesome obstacles to its improved relations with the United States since the collapse of the Soviet Union.


On February 5, Nuclear Fuel reported that members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) had sent diplomatic representations to Moscow criticising Russian shipments of low-enriched uranium (LEU) to India.On February 16, the US State Department issued the following condemnation of the Russian shipments:

"We deeply regret that the Russian Federation has shipped nuclear fuel to the Tarapur power reactors in India in violation of Russia's non-proliferation commitments.



Now go and Google a bit more and would find even better stuff, but only if can read it.




and look at your missile arsenal, all chinese tech just renamed.


Thank for continuing the rants, if it is then all yours are directly coming from Russian plants.:disagree:




:pakistan:

adios
 
.
less, much less dumb then you who cannot read and come up with a more lousy argument,





Now go and Google a bit more and would find even better stuff, but only if can read it.


Thank for continuing the rants, if it is then all yours are directly coming from Russian plants.:disagree:


:pakistan:

adios

You know the truth, i know the truth and the whole world knows it.

If you still wants to close your eyes and wet dream, what can be done in such a situation.

Kush reh yaar, feel good.
 
.
If the Indian missiles technologies are transferred by Russia then how come it takes decades in development, R&D and not to mention several failures?

Well why don't you go and ask your research institutes and organizations?? Only because if they faced failures, that grants it a license of being completely indigenous????:disagree: Well then how about MKIs, which have been produced under license and which you guys praise a lot as super doper AC , how many times have them been grounded??? How about another so called indigenous mirical called Arjun?? why isnt getting inducted after a loong loong long duration of R&D??? why is the the IA shy to induct them?? And how about LCA ??? The list is long but simply it means your organizations are not working upto the standards required.


And if Pakistani missiles are the product of domestic R&D, then how come your missiles are developed overnight and without even a single failures?


First go and check some history, then come up with something to claim. If your missiles fail so does your other projects as i mentioned while its not the case with Pakistan, be it missiles or be it Aircraft's or be it Tanks or any other stuff. It simply means your Research and production facilities are of lower standards that's why the face partial success and partial failures. You guys have made a strange logic out of that.:undecided:


Don't you want to suggest that Indians have not developed missiles successfully even with the help of the Russians.

I explained this part earlier with MKI example.


And Pakistan is technology super power even USA have failures and takes time but your advance country makes missiles in no time without a single failure.

Its the fools paradise you are living in, USA invents everything, the rest of the world follows them, failures for USA is not the same as for you or someone else. If they fail while learning to invent something for the first time is more the OK, but if someone else fails then either he cannot observe or gain on the laws hardly learned or simply he doesn't have the capacity to take advantage of those lessons and make a decent enough product/copy.



:pakistan:




adios
 
.
You know the truth, i know the truth and the whole world knows it.

If you still wants to close your eyes and wet dream, what can be done in such a situation.

Kush reh yaar, feel good.

same massage is for you sir from my side:cheers:


Its a dirty game, no question of morality here, and both the sides know it very well, its another matter if both of them have the guts to confess. Nopes sire, that's not gonna happen.



lets get back to the topic and stop it from derailing.



:pakistan:


Adios
 
. .
Bien dicho amigo! Los indianos no pueden producir nada sin ayuda de otros paises. :D India va a ser exitoso con su LCA cuando Pakistan haya colonizado la luna!

Well why don't you go and ask your research institutes and organizations?? Only because if they faced failures, that grants it a license of being completely indigenous????:disagree: Well then how about MKIs, which have been produced under license and which you guys praise a lot as super doper AC , how many times have them been grounded??? How about another so called indigenous mirical called Arjun?? why isnt getting inducted after a loong loong long duration of R&D??? why is the the IA shy to induct them?? And how about LCA ??? The list is long but simply it means your organizations are not working upto the standards required.





First go and check some history, then come up with something to claim. If your missiles fail so does your other projects as i mentioned while its not the case with Pakistan, be it missiles or be it Aircraft's or be it Tanks or any other stuff. It simply means your Research and production facilities are of lower standards that's why the face partial success and partial failures. You guys have made a strange logic out of that.:undecided:




I explained this part earlier with MKI example.




Its the fools paradise you are living in, USA invents everything, the rest of the world follows them, failures for USA is not the same as for you or someone else. If they fail while learning to invent something for the first time is more the OK, but if someone else fails then either he cannot observe or gain on the laws hardly learned or simply he doesn't have the capacity to take advantage of those lessons and make a decent enough product/copy.



:pakistan:




adios
 
Last edited:
. .
Back
Top Bottom