Abdul Rehman Majeed
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
- Messages
- 5,103
- Reaction score
- -40
- Country
- Location
You do not conduct a second test if the First "failed". You would forensically examine all data from the launch site, missile, splashdown etc before a follow up to understand a failure. Since Pakistan fires Chinese designed missiles it has no knowledge of "failure" or the changes that have to be made. Second test followed first because the first was successful the second confirms viability for serial production
You nukes themselves are a dud.
Scientist reveals India nuke test fizzled
Kasturiranga Santhanam, the coordinator of India's 1998 nuclear tests, went public with allegations that India's much heralded Pokhran II test of a thermonuclear bomb 11 years ago was actually a fizzle.
“We are totally naked vis-a-vis China, which has an inventory of 200 nuclear bombs, the vast majority of which are giant H-bombs of power equal to three million tons of TNT,” Santhanam told reporters in New Delhi this week.
Naturally, the bizarre exercise in reverse brinkmanship (“About that bomb we told you we have...”) did not go down well. India's 1998 demonstration of thermonuclear capability — a
fusion-based, Hydrogen bomb — was the cause of great celebration in a country still fighting for a voice in global affairs and sandwiched between a belligerent, hereditary enemy in Pakistan and a frightening potential future adversary in China.
https://www.pri.org/stories/2009-09-29/scientist-reveals-india-nuke-test-fizzled