Kinetic
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2010
- Messages
- 11,200
- Reaction score
- -33
we will fire another Nasr after that
Nothing to say against this ultimatum! I lose, you win.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we will fire another Nasr after that
LETS FIRE ANOTHER NASR AS A CELEBRATION................Nothing to say against this ultimatum! I lose, you win.
You said both are dead plans ?Show me some official report and why you think end user makes any difference ?Both are surface strike weapon launched from different platform.Mate second thing, when you know a thing, dont ask for source. BTW, even what source you want?
And if the Shurya and Prahaar inducted, then where is user trials? And bro use your brain, the end user of Shaurya and Sagarika are different, and even they are way different in capabilities.
Seems like a pretty good Long range Missile. So India is developing other versions of this it seems?
Congrats by the way for the successful launch.
what is the status of shaurya induction ?Astra and K4 both were tested few months back. And Naval version of Shourya I.e Sagarika has been tested for atleast 10 times now, all successful.
Its a pretty old missile. Agni V with the range of 6000kms is the latest one.Seems like a pretty good Long range Missile. So India is developing other versions of this it seems?
Congrats by the way for the successful launch.
thanks, but I think the missile is about to be retired now and replaced with new ones
It wasn't developmental test but rather routine test by SFC to checkout readiness of the system.Is it? cool. But if they are to retire this, then why are they still testing it?
Is it? cool. But if they are to retire this, then why are they still testing it?
After a reaching an altitude about 600 km
Although the question isn't directed towards me, but of course A4 can replace A2. In my opinion, since DRDO and IA (SFC) don't have a headache for budget, following missiles should be retired and replaced as soon as possible:
-A1 with Shaurya
-A2 with A4
-A3 with A5
The mentioned respective systems are similar in dimensions so the SFC should not go through much trouble in re-assigning previous missile groups. However their RVs are different.
the end user of Shaurya and Sagarika are different, and even they are way different in capabilities.
Could be, but that is precisely what A6 is being developed for, no? Why waste resources on modifying a missile to deliver MIRVs 2000km shorter?
Agreed, A6 will have 3000kg payload. But thats not what I said, I referred to RVs being under 1000kg, which in this case could be 3x1000 or 6x500.
ain't it too much for a MRBM? Also what could be possibly mean by it?Interesting ....... it means a good amount of modification is done on A2 .
DRDO PR on 2011 launch of A2 placed the apogee at 220km .