What's new

India talks tough on one-China policy, says reaffirm one-India policy first

Why doesn't Pakistan just make peace with Afghansitan by accepting their legitimate claim about Durand line?

We will most certainly consider their claims, legitimate or not, once they have a semblance of a 'Government'. The whole sub continent needs peace after decades of battles and wars!
 
.
good and see the power of hard talk

UPDATE 1-Ahead of Xi trip, China says not seeking to contain India| Reuters

i closely studied chinese and i know, when you deal with them, be a bully and they will respect you, if you show weakness, they will bully you. chinese only understand hard power. i always said, indian border guards should have opened fire and many misunderstood me assuming that i want to create trouble between india and china. so i remained silent but now you see, i was right. i say it again, chinese won't retaliate, they will never.

even the vietnamese got it right and they know how to deal with chinese. this time, don't show softness and chinese will accept one india, not only ap but if india goes offensive, china will vacate aksai chin for sure. india must exploit the current geopolitical situation and annex bhutan, nepal, sri lanka and burma, if india misses this opportunity, india will never be able to build one india. its time to put idealism apart and follow the current trend of building empire. opportunities don't come every now and then.

kailash in tibet can be conquered by india this time. with the coming ww3 there will be redrawing of boundaries and the stronger will gain while the weaker will lose. thats reality, get the idealistic moral dildo out of your ***hole and be pragmatic or be a loser
 
.
We keep Aksai Chin, while you can keep South Tibet.

Do you still think this treaty is unfair?



We can acknowledge the AP state if you acknowledge our Aksai Chin.

For the sake of the BRICS, we can step in for the negotiation, so hopefully India can do the same.

Best solution.
 
.
We didn't ask you to concede South Tibet, yet you wanna take Aksai Chin from us?

This kind of unilateral attitude will not solve the border dispute.




You dont understand how you got Aksai Chin do you? Pakistan during the war, took held it as it went thru its offensive. As the war went on, Pakistan immediately gave it away to China. It was never Pakistan's to begin with. It was given to you guys to drag you into the war, create enmity, or quite possibly to allow China to build a driect route to Pakistan.

We will most certainly consider their claims, legitimate or not, once they have a semblance of a 'Government'. The whole sub continent needs peace after decades of battles and wars!


You're worried about peace after supporting terrorism and constatnoy firing at Kashmiri's everyday....plz..
 
Last edited:
.
She said ,"Relations with china is in regards with cooperation and competition"

One India statement was regarding Arunachal pradesh as One china policy include Taiwan and tibet.
 
.
You dont understand how you got Aksai Chin do you? Pakistan during the war, took held it as it went thru its offensive. As the war went on, Pakistan immediately gave it away to China. It was never Pakistan's to begin with. It was given to you guys to drag you into the war, create enmity, or quite possibly to allow China to build a driect route to Pakistan.

Actually no. Aksai Chin has a history before 1947. There were atleast 2 boundaries marked by British, Nehru decided to keep the more controversial Johnson's one.

@ChineseTiger1986
Why Chinese govt changed its claim from Macartney line to further towards India?
 
.
wait what India doesn't recognize Pakistan,Bangladesh,Sri Lanka as independent nations??

We never have. It goes against our official Akhand Bharat policy to do so. Our sole aim and our vow is to revert the Muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh and the Buddhists in Sri Lanka to Hinduism and to reclaim their land as part of Akhand Bharat (Greater India). Once we have done that, there are certain tracts of land which belongs to Afghanistan and Iran which needs conquering and which requires reverting the people there to Hinduism. Once that is done, our scriptural destiny is to conquer the UK and make all White inhabitants of that nation our slaves. Offcourse if there aren't enough Whites in the UK to serve all the Hindus and the newly converted Hindus, we may have to turn towards conquering Europe and the USA to gather more White slaves. It is all contained in the Hindu Vedas. By the way, are you White ? :what:
 
. .
Best solution is for all dharmic countries to form a union- India, Nepal, Myanmar, Thailand, Bhutan, Japan and Tibet. Han China can join us, provided that they revert from Atheism to Buddhism.
 
.
We never have. It goes against our official Akhand Bharat policy to do so. Our sole aim and our vow is to revert the Muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh and the Buddhists in Sri Lanka to Hinduism and to reclaim their land as part of Akhand Bharat (Greater India). Once we have done that, there are certain tracts of land which belongs to Afghanistan and Iran which needs conquering and which requires reverting the people there to Hinduism. Once that is done, our scriptural destiny is to conquer the UK and make all White inhabitants of that nation our slaves. Offcourse if there aren't enough Whites in the UK to serve all the Hindus and the newly converted Hindus, we may have to turn towards conquering Europe and the USA to gather more White slaves. It is all contained in the Hindu Vedas. By the way, are you White ? :what:

hahaha

don't disclose all the plans to these stupid obese anglos, let them remain naive and delusional :lol: let them keep practicing yoga while india sharpens its sword

just pretend to be a friend and back stab given a chance :D with russia preparing for a lethal onslaught, india will finish the anglo empire once and for all. the power of saffron will wipe all the stars and stripes altogether :rofl:
 
.
We keep Aksai Chin, while you can keep South Tibet.

Do you still think this treaty is unfair?



We can acknowledge the AP state if you acknowledge our Aksai Chin.

For the sake of the BRICS, we can step in for the negotiation, so hopefully India can do the same.

Its Fair and Pragmatic.
 
. .
We will keep Aksai Chin, while you can keep South Tibet.

This status quo is the greatest compromise we can concede so far, so you guys shouldn't ask for more.
Your opinion from some Chinese forums?As I know Chinese government does not recognize the McMahon line till now and this standpoint will never be changed.
 
.
A border between two great civilizations should not be name after a British general.
 
.
Chinese should learn knowledges about what are good things and what are bad thing then to make chooses and deside what to get and what to giveup.
A border between two great civilizations should not be name after a British general.
That British general came from one of the two great civilizations so called.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom