What's new

India swiftly rejects U.N. request for a visit to the disputed territory of Kashmir

.
. .
You already are a fool. I don't have to do much to show your foolishness. :D

Calling others fool won't change that you are a fool. An authentic make in India fool. :lol:


After first post we have ANI. Another reliable source. :lol:

I don't even see any Pakistani flag burning in the pictures either.

Leave it buddy. Nobody is burning Pakistani flags in AJK. It is the treatment that only your flag gets in IOK everyday. Even CM of IOK couldn't stop herself from disrespecting your flag when she got a chance.

Mehbooba_Mufti_2973047e.jpg
 
.
good news.

Another one coming from a Pakistani, you should stop making fun of Pakistan on a Pakistani forum.

it is our territory, why are you talking to a Pakistani about our territory? Do you ever talk to them about Banglore, or Chennai or Agartala or what people want there to Pakistanis and try to convince them?
 
.
Stop yapping, it's not helping with your made in China condition. :D

Even your fellow compatriots are not impressed with your foolishness on this thread and are asking you to not to discuss Kashmir with me. :lol:

This shows that you are a true make in India fool. Prepared and packed in some slum of India. :lol:
 
. . .
Why why not let UN team visit now so peaceful Kashmir as claimed by hindus.
ok ok how about we make a trade, we let UN team visit Balushistan so that Modi can sleep `sukh ki nend, us ka Balushistan dukh mujh se nehe ab dekha jata beta` and you let UN team in Kashmir

he he he
 
.
Do you know how many treaties US has broken ? :disagree:

There is no need to abrogate the IWT, just need to violate it and play ignorant, the same way pakistan violates its treaties and plays innocent.

Agreements are a two way street.

As of now, you cannot compare the USA with India. For you to break a treaty or even be as assertive as China, you will need to get that powerful. Dont get me wrong, but thats at least a decade of 8-10% growth (and its associated trickle down effects, including Tech, R&D, strong scientific community etc)

It doesn't make an iota of difference on NSG/UNSC whether or not we follow IWT.

There is exactly one country -China - blocking us, they are not blocking us because of India breaking a treaty. For them it is a strategic calculus which has utterly nothing to do with 'being a responsible international country'.

Every other country can be managed regardless of whether we break IWT or any other treaty barring testing of nuclear weapons. That is the ONE treaty we cannot break...till we get into UNSC. Everything else is a non-entity on an NSG/UNSC bid.

It will become increasingly difficult to find allies and nations supporting your bid when you make assertive moves before you are strong enough. Specially when you have a strong opposition in China that holds a lot of other countries in its sway with its might of money.
 
.
It doesn't make an iota of difference on NSG/UNSC whether or not we follow IWT.

There is exactly one country -China - blocking us, they are not blocking us because of India breaking a treaty. For them it is a strategic calculus which has utterly nothing to do with 'being a responsible international country'.

Every other country can be managed regardless of whether we break IWT or any other treaty barring testing of nuclear weapons. That is the ONE treaty we cannot break...till we get into UNSC. Everything else is a non-entity on an NSG/UNSC bid.

While that is true, there is no need to dismantle the IWT. We just need to fight "the war on terror" with a little payback. A little water terrorism will go a long way in making the pakistanis realise the dangers of terrorism.

As of now, you cannot compare the USA with India. For you to break a treaty or even be as assertive as China, you will need to get that powerful. Dont get me wrong, but thats at least a decade of 8-10% growth (and its associated trickle down effects, including Tech, R&D, strong scientific community etc)

True. Which is why I am not in favour of abrogating the Indus water treaty, just violating it.
 
.
As of now, you cannot compare the USA with India. For you to break a treaty or even be as assertive as China, you will need to get that powerful. Dont get me wrong, but thats at least a decade of 8-10% growth (and its associated trickle down effects, including Tech, R&D, strong scientific community etc)



It will become increasingly difficult to find allies and nations supporting your bid when you make assertive moves before you are strong enough. Specially when you have a strong opposition in China that holds a lot of other countries in its sway with its might of money.
I agree with you on this though.
One or two decades (at max) with over 8% growth and we would be able to break any treaty we like (once again barring nuclear testing which cannot be done till we enter UNSC , regardless of how strong we are ).

If we are able to achieve that (growth) then we would have the financial, technical wherewithal to make our own terms to a significant extant.
 
. .
Your unbiased and reasonable actions needs to be highlighted, right?

What better way?



Oh nothing much but we don't repeat mistakes we did and like our neighbours do. After all repeating same mistakes is classified foolish, no?

What happens in IOK also needs to highlighted :woot:
 
.
India's Response

No comparison between J&K and P0K - India's response to UN's request for access to Kashmir

http://zeenews.india.com/news/india...ns-request-for-access-to-kashmir_1928881.html
 
.
Back
Top Bottom