joekrish
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2011
- Messages
- 3,223
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
i think Pakistani side was willing to accept any responsibility if there was any; whereas indians were not
proof of that is the pre-cautionary arrest and detention of alleged suspects like HS and the raiding of JuD seminaries and institutions -- which was an extra-ordinary measure since the courts hadn't the evidence to warrant such actions (lets not delve there though because it's a recipe for more side-debates)
you can't really juxtapose 26/11 (a one-off terrorist incident which we all condemned in strongest terms) versus non-sporadic covert actions in Pakistani Balochistan via a third-country
Pakistan accepted the responsibility because of the pressure put on it by the international community and not because it was willing but that is the view of an Indian and may be the international community. As far as Indian involvement goes I think until and unless you involve and produce sight able evidence to the international community the so called involvement is not going to be taken seriously.