What's new

‘India shouldn’t impose its will on neighbours’

So , rearshot - just for a change in the argument - so what if we happen to control some countries in the neighborhood? In geopolitics, no country is a friend that's deeper than ocean and higher than the sky.

Just admit it, no one here judging your country except for those guys that just happens to be "controlled" by yours.Just don't act like a gay still inside a closet. Just admit it that your country do those things behind closed door.
 
.
According to my thesis it is impossible for India not to interfere in its neighbors internal affairs as it requires policy conformity in neighboring countries simply to retain its own cohesion and stability as it is essentially an artificial country -
What a feather-brain thesis, nonsensical to the core! And you're a 'Think Tank Analyst'? Jeeez!

So according to you, India has to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries for it's own stability? Lol!

And secondly, according to you, India is an 'artificial' country? Woot!

I wonder what type of grass you get in BD? Seems to make people pretty high, what?
 
.
Thesis? Did you get a P.Hd. in advanced B.S. from Jhumritalya University?

You don't need a Phd to write a thesis ....

What a feather-brain thesis, nonsensical to the core! And you're a 'Think Tank Analyst'? Jeeez!

Well there are a dozen essays and articles available and written by Indians which suggest that it is in India's interests to keep Pakistan unstable. A similar process works for other countries when they step out of line.
 
. . .
India's neighborhood is full of such nice people that we don't have to impose anything. We politely ask and they deliver with a smile.
 
.
Just admit it, no one here judging your country except for those guys that just happens to be "controlled" by yours.Just don't act like a gay still inside a closet. Just admit it that your country do those things behind closed door.

Smart-alec, I just admitted to you vaguely that we do ! You didn't get the gist? Tsk tsk tsk tsk ...
 
.
What a feather-brain thesis, nonsensical to the core! And you're a 'Think Tank Analyst'? Jeeez!

So according to you, India has to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries for it's own stability? Lol!

And secondly, according to you, India is an 'artificial' country? Woot!

I wonder what type of grass you get in BD? Seems to make people pretty high, what?

India is an Artificial construction. Ask Lee Kuan Yew.
 
.
Ahem...

Sri Lanka with the invasion.

Bhutan are de-facto India's puppet which cause ire to some of its citizens.

Bangladesh with political & economic domination.

I don't need to tell you about Pakistan.

So there you have it. India does "impose its will on her neighbors."

No one can ride your back unless its bent .
 
.
Thesis? Did you get a P.Hd. in advanced B.S. from Jhumritalya University?
Even in BSc as well as MSc we write a thesis...Just out of curiosity do you guys only produce a thesis in PhD?
 
.
But what if one party support terrorism in our country (ULFA) and another one is ready to wipe them out??

These stupid so called intellectual never lost their family members in these terrorist strikes that's why they can BS to any extend.

Indian foreign policy analyst C Raja Mohan on Wednesday said that India cannot impose its political will on its neighbouring countries and should avoid taking positions on internal problems of the neighbours.
Raja Mohan, the head of strategic studies and distinguished fellow of Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, made the observation at a lecture session on ‘Political transition in India: What it means for South Asia and beyond’ at a city hotel.
Bangladesh Institute of Peace and Security Studies organised the lecture session in association with news portal Probe News.
Politicians, academics, security analysts and political scientists joined the programme and took part in the question and answer session
Replying to a volley of questions, Raja Mohan said ‘There are some issues with our neighbours, but India cannot impose its political will. It cannot say that I will deal with one type of regime and will not deal with another type of regime.’
He said, ‘There is no luxury of non-engagement with neighbours irrespective of the party in power in the neighbouring country.’
Asked whether India should tell Bangladesh what it should do, Raja Mohan said, ‘It is fundamentally wrong. You can only encourage or support someone, but you should avoid taking positions on the internal problems of the neighbour.’
Observing that resolving India’s problems with its neighbours a major challenge of the Narendra Modi’s government, Raja Mohan said that both India’s foreign and economic policies were going to change under the Modi government.
‘We are going to see substantive expansions of economic relations between India and China in the coming days. The challenge of the Modi government would be how it would keep security issues and boundary issues under reasonable control and how it would expand economic cooperation with China,’ he said.
As for India’s previous government’s failures to sign deals with Bangladesh, he said, the previous government lost the historic moment in clinching the agreements. ‘In September 2011, the Indian prime minister came here but of no avail due to its inability to manage the domestic politics.’
He said, ‘This government is very clear on this point. It has got the strength. It has got the political will to deal with the neighbours from far more productive approach as it has got the domestic strength to deliver on the agreement that would be.’
Raja Mohan said, ‘The previous government did a lot with a number of countries. But there was no political component to conduct the foreign policy. But this government is very different.’
‘I think there is willingness in New Delhi to take the risk to solve the outstanding problems for the first time in long time and which is positive,’ he said.
He noted that unlike the previous government, the BJP government would be more open to China for economic reasons and would engage more with China to leverage the Chinese money and technology.

‘India shouldn’t impose its will on neighbours’

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to my thesis it is impossible for India not to interfere in its neighbors internal affairs as it requires policy conformity in neighboring countries simply to retain its own cohesion and stability as it is essentially an artificial country -

https://www.academia.edu/5690262/The_India_Doctrine_1947-2007_

Again you insert your low level BS in OP post with original post, why hell your unusual garbage allowed in every thread related to India??
 
.
India has adopted a rather passive role in the region since its independence. Its failed experiment with socialism and control of the markets by the government for most of its independent years somewhat isolated it. Now that it has an expansionist economic policy, it clearly has to ensure a stable neighborhood. Its main competitor in the neighborhood China, has a robust economic approach internationally and more so in the neighborhood. Put simply, India cannot sit back and not protect its interests in the neighborhood. It has to ensure stability and to a large extent economic progress of its smaller neighbors.
 
.
......
Replying to a volley of questions, Raja Mohan said ‘There are some issues with our neighbours, but India cannot impose its political will. It cannot say that I will deal with one type of regime and will not deal with another type of regime.’
He said, ‘There is no luxury of non-engagement with neighbours irrespective of the party in power in the neighbouring country.’
Asked whether India should tell Bangladesh what it should do, Raja Mohan said, ‘It is fundamentally wrong. You can only encourage or support someone, but you should avoid taking positions on the internal problems of the neighbour.’...

Well last I heard it was the confusion around which regime to talk to, the political or the military when did India impose selective engagement? Legitimate regime can be debated on though.

Oh please, if Bangladesh is sending its pole vaulters across the IB, we should not tell them to control them? :P
 
.
Should you always post link of your flop book to your thread? :coffee:

It cannot be called FLOP.

His brother bought 100 copies.

His brother in law bought 100 copies.

His father in law bought 100 copies.

His father bought 100 copies.

He gifted his wife 100 copies.

He gifted his kids 100 copies (now they make rockets of it's pages).

His own publisher bought 100 copies.

He himself bought 1000 copies.


Now all are BANKRUPT!!!!
 
.
What a feather-brain thesis, nonsensical to the core! And you're a 'Think Tank Analyst'? Jeeez!

So according to you, India has to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries for it's own stability? Lol!

And secondly, according to you, India is an 'artificial' country? Woot!

I wonder what type of grass you get in BD? Seems to make people pretty high, what?


India is a country but not a nation.

A prosperous BD will call into question why India
should exist.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom