What's new

India Should Take Action Against Lanka

.
I don't know how a women takes side towards killing of innicent civilians, I think you are one of a kind, I am not sure how good you can be a mother when you have no love in your heart for humanity.

its you who are supporting killing of innocent people by supporting LTTE terrorists not me.


you can raise voice for victims but you have no legal right to take action against Sri Lanka.

BTW why Indian govt is NOT listening to you? why Indian govt is supporting killers of "civilian" if we may take your claims into consideration?

shouldnt you be protesting against your own govt instead of abusing me ??
 
. . .
Finally u agreed that it was indeed killing of innocent tamils . Thanks. :cheers:


so you agree your Indian govt supported killing of "innocent tamils" by opposing UN resolution ?

then why you bharatis are crying here when your Government supports these killings
 
.
its you who are supporting killing of innocent people by supporting LTTE terrorists not me.


you can raise voice for victims but you have no legal right to take action against Sri Lanka.

BTW why Indian govt is NOT listening to you? why Indian govt is supporting killers of "civilian" if we may take your claims into consideration?

shouldnt you be protesting against your own govt instead of abusing me ??

see madam, if you take this kind of an attitude, not even god can give you wisdom. and if you say moral support for LTTE was wrong and why the crap your government is supporting and exporting terrorist all over the planet, read the origin of all the Islamic terror network of the planet and you'll find its Pakistan.
and as far as the Government of India not backing the UN, resolution is because of one family and not the representaion of the will of the entire population of tamils.
 
.
so you agree your Indian govt supported killing of "innocent tamils" by opposing UN resolution ?

then why you bharatis are crying here when your Government supports these killings

Haha ..where did they say they supported the killings?

Didnt you read many articles and news reports that suggests otherwise.

Or are u trying to play " i dont know about anything" game?
 
.
Haha ..where did they say they supported the killings?

Didnt you read many articles and news reports that suggests otherwise.

Or are u trying to play " i dont know about anything" game?
hahahahaha by opposing UN resolution against Sri Lanka over these "killings" Indian literally supported the killing
 
.
and as far as the Government of India not backing the UN, resolution is because of one family and not the representaion of the will of the entire population of tamils.

lolzzzzzz so you mean your elected government does not represent INDIA??

and oh btw India gave active support to LTTE terrorists by giving them training and funds and shelter not just moral
 
.
hahahahaha by opposing UN resolution against Sri Lanka over these "killings" Indian literally supported the killing

Yup it matches the original article about rehabs and other schemes.Last week a delegation was in Lanka to talk about them.

The Hindu : Front Page : Menon, Nirupama to hold talks with Sri Lankan officials


Regarding the atrocities against civilians India can afford to keep silent or oppose but the tribunals finding will have impact on action against them by UN.
So its a good ploy to keep lanka engaged.

If you go by sense , any aggression by India ultimatley results in suffering of the rest of the civilians and their future rehab processes.

So we are playing it safe.
 
.
i think india shud engage U.S against lanka...by keeping himself away....
west have enough diplomatic power..
 
.
Yup it matches the original article about rehabs and other schemes.Last week a delegation was in Lanka to talk about them.

The Hindu : Front Page : Menon, Nirupama to hold talks with Sri Lankan officials



Regarding the atrocities against civilians India can afford to keep silent or oppose but the tribunals finding will have impact on action against them by UN.
So its a good ploy to keep lanka engaged.

If you go by sense , any aggression by India ultimatley results in suffering of the rest of the civilians and their future rehab processes.

So we are playing it safe.

1. what UN will say that is one thing and anything coming from UN will be widely accepted unlike any interference by India.


2. Any aggression by India will be an act of WAR against country of Sri Lanka and hence you can not afford it as you will not like your south india falling to this active war.

so its a compulsion you cant attack Sri Lanka
 
.
India Should Leave Sri Lanka alone and let them solve their own problems, India messing with Lanka will be seen as an act of aggression.
 
.
i think india shud engage U.S against lanka...by keeping himself away....
west have enough diplomatic power..

:lol: US will love to expand its muscles in Indian ocean by having bases in Sri Lanka instead of attacking Sri Lanka on behest of India
 
.
1. what UN will say that is one thing and anything coming from UN will be widely accepted unlike any interference by India.


2. Any aggression by India will be an act of WAR against country of Sri Lanka and hence you can not afford it as you will not like your south india falling to this active war.

so its a compulsion you cant attack Sri Lanka

india can afford every kind of diplomatic war..:D
if it is undiplomatic ..then tell me how india cant afford it.??:what:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom