Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
You will hesitate and you won't use it.keeping NFU is important however i agree some revisions need to be done my view would be that
no first use against non nuclear weapons states however non nuclear weapons states attack on India with any kind of WMD will issue the "Massive response"
and as for nuclear weapons states no first use unless information relating to a first strike on India is received or if Indian territory/nation is at risk then nuclear force will be required
and we should not hesitate to use nukes first against belligerent territorial expansionists
You will hesitate and you won't use it.
As long as there is something left worth living for you won't end your life and a billion+ people with you.
Politicians are liars and hypocrites, but they are not stupid.
Nukes are just for MAD, nothing more nothing less.
our nuclear weapons are simply for deterrence not black mail or anything else should deterrence fail then it will be a tragedy we won't nuke anyone unless they attack Indian civilians or our forces with any kind of WMD
and we should not hesitate to use nukes first against belligerent territorial expansionists
This is something entirely different than:
and we should not hesitate to use nukes first against belligerent territorial expansionists
In that case see reply #32 and #35.by this i mean should deterrence fail and if an enemy (nuclear weapons state)has taken a good part of Indian territory under control then use of nuclear weapons first should be considered.
In that case see reply #32 and #35.
You can consider it, but you won't sacrify your whole population just because you lost some territory. You won't even do it if you loose all your territory.
Just think about it, are the lifes of you family and relatives worth nothing if your country would loose some land? Are they better of dead if the city they live in is to be captured by the enemy?
More sinister: Can you plot your revenge if you're dead?
and we should not hesitate to use nukes first against belligerent territorial expansionists
our nuclear weapons are simply for deterrence not black mail or anything else should deterrence fail then it will be a tragedy we won't nuke anyone unless they attack Indian civilians or our forces with any kind of WMD
by this i mean should deterrence fail and if an enemy (nuclear weapons state)has taken a good part of Indian territory under control then use of nuclear weapons first should be considered.
India would never launch its nukes first unless of course they are hit by a first strike from an enemy nation the entire Indian nuclear weapons are not for bullying or black mailing rather simple minimum credible deterrence
You do understand you just changed your position 3 times, from FU to NFU to FU to NFU.
So I should take this as a "maybe" of a "i'm not sure"?
my view of nuclear weapons depends on the situation really NFU for non nuclear states NFU against nuclear states UNLESS deterrence fails i'll let you figure out the rest
NFU against non nuclear states = NO USE
NFU against nuclear states UNLESS deterrence fails = FU = MAD
So in the end to you some loss of land is more important than the life of the entire Indian population
Now I am really confusedwhat do you expect if we get nuked you expect us not to nuke back? that is the point of NFU if Russia nuked the U.S do you think uncle sam would stand by idly?
No First Use UNLESS deterrence fails, doesn't it mean that you will USE FIRST if others are not deterred and attack you (conventionally, not nuking you)NFU against nuclear states UNLESS deterrence fails