What's new

India should accept defeat before Kashmiris’ struggle, says Nawaz

Lot of time and energy there...Your version of story..No one gives two hoots. till you make it official at UN and its documented . If you didnt iw ould say your country did a great disservice to your people.




How about you start believing other Pakistani documents as well :)

All Pakistani documents point in the same direction. That is the tragedy of Pakistan. As for your earlier remark, about making it official at the UN, try to remember the circumstances. India accused Pakistan of aggression; Pakistan denied it then, and admitted it later. So where does the UN come in? Were they supposed to cross-examine the Pakistani delegation? Or are you asking us to believe that the original lie, reflected in good faith in the wording of the UN Resolution, which was contradicted by the original admission, should now vanish into thin air?

It isn't my/our version of the story, it is the documentation, plain and simple. And it is an attempt by one individual to weasel a way out of an admittedly untenable situation.
 
You should really read your history particularly your forefathers rebellion against Pakistan ,your so called Muslim saviors.

This is not about Bangladesh but we know all too well struggle for independence. Also we are not trapped into 45 years old indian lie and deception tactics. Bangladesh and other Muslims should help Kashmiri people every way possible stopping indian genocide.
 
This is not about Bangladesh but we know all too well struggle for independence. Also we are not trapped into 45 years old indian lie and deception tactics. Bangladesh and other Muslims should help Kashmiri people every way possible stopping indian genocide.

I'm sure your forefathers didn't shared same concern of Indian lie and false genocide propaganda carried out in your county, so they had rebel against their own country
 
All Pakistani documents point in the same direction. That is the tragedy of Pakistan. As for your earlier remark, about making it official at the UN, try to remember the circumstances. India accused Pakistan of aggression; Pakistan denied it then, and admitted it later. So where does the UN come in? Were they supposed to cross-examine the Pakistani delegation? Or are you asking us to believe that the original lie, reflected in good faith in the wording of the UN Resolution, which was contradicted by the original admission, should now vanish into thin air?

It isn't my/our version of the story, it is the documentation, plain and simple. And it is an attempt by one individual to weasel a way out of an admittedly untenable situation.
. Lot of talk and no material.. gives a hint you really cant counter the fact regarding UN resolution not asking anything from pak forces. Thats the only reason only pak raises the importance of this UN resolution whilee india tries to hush it up calling it obsolete. Little they know they were the ones who asked for it. They took it to the security council back in the day. What a blunder by the indian bureaucracy...
 
. Lot of talk and no material.. gives a hint you really cant counter the fact regarding UN resolution not asking anything from pak forces. Thats the only reason only pak raises the importance of this UN resolution whilee india tries to hush it up calling it obsolete. Little they know they were the ones who asked for it. They took it to the security council back in the day. What a blunder by the indian bureaucracy...

LOL.

The facts are there for all to see. I am happy to let readers judge, and to let them see the spins that you have been putting on, one after another, in a vain attempt to regain lost ground. A for effort, F for result.
 
This is not about Bangladesh but we know all too well struggle for independence. Also we are not trapped into 45 years old indian lie and deception tactics. Bangladesh and other Muslims should help Kashmiri people every way possible stopping indian genocide.

First stop killing Hindus in Bangla.
The quiet genocide of Bangla Hindus is telling.

If some terrorists want freedom, we will give it to him like we gave to coward Wani.
Instead of this chest thumping, I wish the umma folks volunteer and go to Kashmir.
 
That's true Kashmiri spoken. Despite of his pro-India stances, inside his heart he will always be Kashmiri first. :D
 
Was that before or after genocide of Hindu Pandits?

It is not wise to get stuck in the history since the real genocide against Hindus started by Qasim. As history we know today, Mughal ruled Indians for hundred of years, then the creation of Pakistan coupled with some quarter of freedom for Kashmir as well. Similarity, the future of Kashmir lies with the present living there. The future of Kashmir will be dictated by its own people living there, native Kashmiris.

What happened in the past stays in the past. My advice is to leave the past in the past.
 
What happened in the past stays in the past. My advice is to leave the past in the past.

Very convenient isn't it?
When Hindus are at the receiving end, let's forget the past.
When it is your kind, we will wage a thousand year war.....

Fascinating to look into the minds of racists & bigots.
 
Very convenient isn't it?
When Hindus are at the receiving end, let's forget the past.
When it is your kind, we will wage a thousand year war.....

Fascinating to look into the minds of racists & bigots.

Because it is happening in the present. Your stances boil down to the past. So why the selective past? When not start with Pakistan? Why not start with Mughal ruling for hundreds of years? Why not start with Qasim invasion?

You can't because history is history for a reason. That's why it is imperative to leave past in the past, so it allows the room for the future to build. Unfortunately, Indians are still stuck in the past, and for that reason alone, they will never get out of the never-ending conflicts.

If anything, history taught you one thing that nothing is certain for sure. If you continue to hold grudgingly to the past, you might lose the present whatever you have left.
 
Because it is happening in the present. Your stances boil down to the past. So why the selective past? When not start with Pakistan? Why not start with Mughal ruling for hundreds of years? Why not start with Qasim invasion?

Couple of decades after exterminating the terrorists in Kashmir, we can say the same thing?

Or will you still crib about "past deeds"?
 
Couple of decades after exterminating the terrorists in Kashmir, we can say the same thing?

Or will you still crib about "past deeds"?

It won't change anything. Muslims are multiplying fast. You are gonna have to exterminate the entire population of Kashmir to make your case. Your plan won't succeed, and if anything, you will lose whatever present you have left. As i mentioned earlier, if you continue to hold grudging to the past, you will lose whatever present you have left. History attests to that. India is still huge nation, but that won't be the case anymore as the creation of Pakistan is reminder for that. Nonetheless, do whatever you want, but the history will repeat itself as it had in the past.
 
It won't change anything. Muslims are multiplying fast. You are gonna have to exterminate the entire population of Kashmir to make your case.

That's what terrorists have done to Hindu Pandits.
What makes you think that wound is forgotten or the terrorists will be dealt with any differently than Wani?

Keep sending them and we will keep chopping em up.

As you claimed, past is past, so will we claim and start a new with the extermination of terrorists.

Status quo suits just as well. You know why? Because the terrorists dying are Kashmiri and people dying at the hands of terrorists are Kashmiri.
 
That's what terrorists have done to Hindu Pandits.
What makes you think that wound is forgotten or the terrorists will be dealt with any differently than Wani?

Keep sending them and we will keep chopping em up.

As you claimed, past is past, so will we claim and start a new with the extermination of terrorists.

Status quo suits just as well. You know why? Because the terrorists dying are Kashmiri and people dying at the hands of terrorists are Kashmiri.

You took away their homes and the native Kashmiris are terrorists?

Do you realize you are talking about million terrorists if your definition of terrorist is native kashmiris defending their homes against the illegally invaders [Indian]?

You already lost a lot. You sure you wanna lose the rest of India? Be my guest. As you continue to hold grudging to the past, you will lose whatever present you have left. Have fun! :D
 
Back
Top Bottom