Yep and look at the type of headlines India gets which are second to none:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/164677-sri-lanka-irrelevance-india-geneva.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep and look at the type of headlines India gets which are second to none:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/164677-sri-lanka-irrelevance-india-geneva.html
Am I being slow or what because I just can't see the link and how you got to that piece of news. Is it just that you looked for ANY bad headline referring to India regardless of content? If so I could easily fill a 20 page thread with negative headlines relating to Pakistan.
But come on pal let's not do this, let's stick to the topic and not let this get out of hand.
Indians should realise when they put up or support headlines like they are second to none that there are other articles which actually suggest the opposite
short failure list.
LCA (+ all parts)
ARJUN
Kaveri
Ansas
Satellite launching
AESA radar development (plane drop, RIP for Scientists)
etc (just like "second to none" etc mean go google urself find plenty more "hum kisi sey kam nahi")
one more failure . totally failed to describe the terms like "Indigenous" and "second to none"
Yes but the point you made about SL and Geneva has nothing to do with the R&D effort by India. You should always take comments like this with a pinch of salt, especially during budget time. Same is true for any project in any nation.
Agree with you mate but have you seen how many have come on here trying to defend this ridiculous assertion
here is sucess list
LCH
Pinaka
Dhruv ( Ecuador bought it )
Akash (3000 ordered)
and how LCA and Arjun are failures when IAF is set to induct 6 Squadrons of LCA ( will be followed by more )and 248 Arjuns are ordered?
New Recruit
Yep and look at the type of headlines India gets which are second to none:
defence . pk/......../164677-sri-lanka-irrelevance-india-geneva.html
then what is the need of pakistan in SCO..!!!
New Recruit
well copying the external strucring doesn't mean we are cloning...the insas might look similar to AKM but AKM uses 7.62 rounds whereas insas primarily uses 5.56(although 7.62 round has come up afew years ago),the lca and arjun might look similar to certain others but the components are different(we wouldn't have bought 126 rafales then,we buy 26,clone the rest;lol)and your last statement was ridiculous,india is the largest producer and exporter of garments in the world,indian companies don't need advertisement!!!!lol more clueless excuses for your primitive defense industry..here is the reality
INSAS a copy of Kalashnikov's action system and receiver, and failed
Modern Firearms - INSAS
Arjun a copy of German Leopard turret (almost identical) and British 120mm rifled tank gun and with many foreign components..failed
LCA a copy of French Mirage fuslage and areodynamics, again with foreign direct imports, failed
these are few classic examples,
you cant copy probably even with way much better accessibility to western components.
for all the internationl trade fairs i have been too in Europ, either you dont find india company exhibting or an Indian company with all those copied products from bags, shoes, jeans to others with such low quality