ApparentRaceTraitor
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,217
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
DRDO's projects are sanctioned by a joint committee of distinguished scientists who has spent a lifetime working for Indian scientific advancement. They projects are reviewed by Indian Defence heads and Bureaucratic and the Budget is allocated and sanctioned by professional Accounting body.
You must excuse my contempt for internet boys who think they know better than professionals who have spent their entire life doing what they do.
If multiple projects are sanctioned its because they are deemed necessary in the bigger scheme of things. This Big Picture is envisioned with an eye on the future and by accessing the present and studying the past.
DRDO labs also work within the bureaucratic system where they have to spend all the budget allocated to them or their funds will be reduced in the next year. This means that if they are unable to spend the money on productive projects ..they have to spend it on unnproductive projects too. This is one of the reasons ....they are multiple such practical reason.
For the Bureaucracy such budget allocation standard also follows a normalizing curve and is scientific way of budgeting huge spends.
There is a method to the 'madness' that you see in DRDO.......Just because you have limited ability to understand or see it does not mean DRDO is stupid...it just means someone else is ignorant.
No offense taken as long as the debate is kept civil and informative.
Everything what you've said might be effective on paper, but has any of this really helped the end users to the extent other R&D organizations have for the armed forces of their respective nations, namely IAF, IN and IA (granted, IAF and IA don't exactly have a hard on for quite a bit of what DRDO has offered, due to a myriad of reasons, some clear, some highly suspicious). Look we both agree that DRDO is an organization with limited funding, but with a lot of manpower, but IMO multiple projects drains those resources rapidly to the point that there is only so much one can do in any given fiscal year, till the funding for the next period is released. This in turn has an impact on the pace of the projects wouldn't you say? I hardly think anyone at DRDO is stupid, my issue is with the constant parading of project status reports on media channels that thrive on sensationalism and disregard for accuracy. Why the need for PR? Keep DRDO's projects as 'black' as possible, and then score on the success in the end. At the very very least, DRDO needs competition, otherwise where's the attempt to strive for excellence when you know that at the end of the day, you are guaranteed a paycheque from the people, no matter what to carry out your job.