AnnoyingOrange
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2012
- Messages
- 4,251
- Reaction score
- -27
- Country
- Location
1. if we dint find any Indian involved in killings of Pakistanis then howcome you are "trying" someone for Samjhota express terrorism by Indians?
He is an Indian who committed a crime on Indian soil and he is being tried as per Indian Laws... Pakistan has nothing to do with this ..so you guys can't claim it to be a terror attack on Pakistan...
2. Indeed claim for incircumcised by someone was wrong since you dont have much beef for circumcission.
So all incircumcised = Hindus or Indians.... really...
Read this :
Male circumcision is obligatory for the Muslim male if he is able to do it. If, however, he is unable, whether due to fear of injury or if a respected and authoritative doctor has told him he will experience profuse bleeding which may make his life miserable, then the obligation for cirumcision is waived and he does not commit a sin by not having it done.
http://islamqa.info/en/ref/463/Circumcision
3. the accused of mumbai attacks is hanged already and hence chances of even imgining as PM are finished. and above all its not India where terrorists like Modi can become a PM.
Rant.