Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they should know everything is reciprocative in nature when it comes to diplomacy.LOL. Most certainly we should learn. Better late than never.
Indian rape laws are pretty strict and if any Indian worker working in the US consulate ever charges any US consulate member of even attempting to rape, they go to Jail without any possibility of Bail.
Withdrawing the member's diplomatic status is only the first step towards taking stronger action against them. This should get pretty interesting.
agree but y search accused diplomat by removing clothes and that to a lady shame on ur law enforcement agencies right step taken indian govermentMate - She has been accused of felony - giving false statement for visa purposes constitutes 10 years as per US laws. In felony cases, there is no question about asking someone to report to police station especially her who can sit in the Indian consulate premises and NYPD would not be able to do anything. Handcuffing is a normal process and she can be arrested only outside of her vehicle(which is a Indian government sovereign space) or Indian consulate. They can arrest her only in public place i.e when out of the vehicle and that is what they have done here.
So it is a matter of perceived public humiliation vs how the U.S law enforcement agencies operate.
She is a Deputy Consul General of the US mission so that makes her No. 2 in the Indian embassy.
She does have diplomatic immunity and the US has taken refuge in a technicality to arrest her. There will be Serious Long lasting repercussions and then the NYPD police chief and DA can explain to the US public and the govt. why they did, what they did.
agree but y search accused diplomat by removing clothes and that to a lady shame on ur law enforcement agencies right step taken indian goverment
No Indian beats drums if he donates something, This is not a Indian culture. So you are not Indian. Even if true about your donation, you have done nothing compared to average Indian does. So stop braging and remove our national flag from your ID.
Don't you think that misstating the salary for visa process and then underpaying the maid constitutes "grave" crime? There is a minimum salary to qualify for visa to US(for example, H1 used to be $36,000 per hour) but she was paid less than $4 per hour(do note that the minimum wage in US is $7.25 per hour). This is at best labor exploitation and worst case it is human trafficking. Whatever may be the case, she has committed a fraud. The question here is the diplomatic immunity for which she qualifies or not. That is the root of the contention here between U.S and Indian Governments.
The question is, how do the arresting officer know he or she is arresting a diplomat in the first place?
She can say she is a diplomat but all claim can only be verified after the subject was detained and processed. In which the background of the detainee is reviewed. Officer cannot just let go of detainee because they tell them they are diplomat...
Even if a search is conduct and ID were produced, how can the officer assure the ID is indeed legitimate? Not like an average NYC police officer would know what a diplomatic ID card look like.
The arrest was not made with embassy ground nor diplomat residence, you cannot assume the officer know she is a diplomat for sure. That is the point
right step ret jawab pathar se do
lol what average Indian does is talk s**t just like you did right now. Go put in some work and then you can quote me.
The NYPD and DA know the repercussions which would come from Washington DC if they acted in a wrong manner and they would have taken that into consideration before acting. Beyond that, there is no question about them explaining to US public. The immigrants are exploited here in US and they would see it as this Indian official exploiting the uneducated nanny by paying less.
Meanwhile what is the need for this Indian official to bring a nanny from India if she can't afford to pay the minimum wages prescribed by U.S visa procedures?
I actually haven't gone into the merits of the case, it is not relevant to the point I was making. Even if the U.S. case was valid, there was no conceivable reason to treat her in the manner that she has been treated. After all U.S. embassy staff & their partners who are homosexual can legally be arrested because they are committing a crime in India. What you think of the law is not relevant, what needs to be explained is why U.S. officials & their partners should be above the law of the land. I don't support any such action but the legal parameters of a breach of law remain the same in both cases.
right step ret jawab pathar se do
Americans should learn to understand Indian media gimmick.
defending your diplomat for wrongdoing
Its better than bottlicking the west , am quiet glad folks like you are not in India and polluting the surroundings