Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Common civil code is an answer to a problem that is non existant. We are doing just as good without it. Common civil code only generates issues than solving issues. In India what is right is different from village to village. Lets not chain by what the majority think is right. The best option is to create a standard marriage act for india and give that as an option to couples when they marry along with their religions marriage act. They should be allowed to opt during marriage registration and be judged by their choice.A Sikh marriage act would be a regressive step. We don't need any more religion based divisions. We should instead put all our focus on creating a Common Civil Code.
And Islam preaches tolerance and Christianity is all about love and...yeh, keep using the book as some kind of "defense" against real life insanity. Perhaps you should ask Sikhs to practice Sikhism then.
Bro do you forget why Guru Govind ji Shaab formed a group and who are the member of that group and selection process and what was the reason behind it. The only word "Hindu" is that the real problem which pinch you, I think the word hurts more. And what was happened in 84 that was not honorable, you know Indian not feel proud of it, whatever they Hindu, Buddhis, Jain, Christians, Muslim no one and you know that even you can see in the Punjab, people don't another any "stan".
Hindu marriage act is encompasses all dharmic rteligions me and other memeber have stated so many times to prebvenet unnecessary act for each dharmic religion be hindu , buddist , sikh or jain etc .
These dharmic religions have to no prior written marriage codes unlike Muslim , Christians , so only after indian Independence a marriage code was formulated and it was only named Hindu marriage act for ease of nomenclature .
since you brounght of the caste issue, while muslims and Christians aren't eligible for reservation , backward castes hindus and sikhs have access to reservation quota since there is the issue of casteim in most dharmic religions . Mazhabi sikhs still suffer casteism of forward caste jatt Sikhs
PS: India is also called Hindustan doesn't mean every indian is automatically becomes Hindu religionist.
Hindu marriage act is encompasses all dharmic rteligions me and other memeber have stated so many times to prebvenet unnecessary act for each dharmic religion be hindu , buddist , sikh or jain etc .
These dharmic religions have to no prior written marriage codes unlike Muslim , Christians , so only after indian Independence a marriage code was formulated and it was only named Hindu marriage act for ease of nomenclature .
since you brounght of the caste issue, while muslims and Christians aren't eligible for reservation , backward castes hindus and sikhs have access to reservation quota since there is the issue of casteim in most dharmic religions . Mazhabi sikhs still suffer casteism of forward caste jatt Sikhs
PS: India is also called Hindustan doesn't mean every indian is automatically becomes Hindu religionist.
LIAR, you are just Posting for SAKE of posting. you don't have IOTA of knowledge.
SIkhs had marriage CODE prior to independence CALLED as Anand Karaj act, drafted in 1909. So your statement, fails automatically.
Anand Karaj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am really amazed by attitude of fellow indian's. I mean they saying NO or HESITATE to something that would reconcile, Heal the wounds, Shut down many faces and Strengthen the UNITY..
What happened guys, where is your IndIanization Now?? What happened to patriotism , love for nation , Unity in diversity, Equality for all ....all in drains ha..
And yeah, If you want to talk about secularism and equality terms. India should also not be Hindustan (Yeah, you will come up with YOU ARE JUST talking for NAME sake or otherwise no relation with HINDUS) but reality is that i haven't met any Non-Hindu who like to call it as Hindustan, everyone prefers India or Bharat is Good..Every Non-Hindu avoids using word Hindustan.
Anand Karaj act is the one we have in Pakistan for Sikh Marriages, the cool thing is anyone in the world can do it.
BUT INDIA CLAIM TO HAVE sikh prime minister, muslim president and Christian minister ..why they keep telling us the religion of politician if they are not religious lolWhat religious leaders? India doesn't have priest or Maulvi politicians, not even in so called religious parties like BJP or Muslim party in Kerala.
^^^^^^^ Bal and Raj Thackery
BUT INDIA CLAIM TO HAVE sikh prime minister, muslim president and Christian minister ..why they keep telling us the religion of politician if they are not religious lol
No one cares. It's when people like you ask, Then we reply.
I dont care either . Go back and read it ..It was you guys who were shouting at our faces that you have Muslim president and Sikh prime minister
LIAR, you are just Posting for SAKE of posting. you don't have IOTA of knowledge.
SIkhs had marriage CODE prior to independence CALLED as Anand Karaj act, drafted in 1909. So your statement, fails automatically.
Anand Karaj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am really amazed by attitude of fellow indian's. I mean they saying NO or HESITATE to something that would reconcile, Heal the wounds, Shut down many faces and Strengthen the UNITY..
What happened guys, where is your IndIanization Now?? What happened to patriotism , love for nation , Unity in diversity, Equality for all ....all in drains ha..
And yeah, If you want to talk about secularism and equality terms. India should also not be Hindustan (Yeah, you will come up with YOU ARE JUST talking for NAME sake or otherwise no relation with HINDUS) but reality is that i haven't met any Non-Hindu who like to call it as Hindustan, everyone prefers India or Bharat is Good..Every Non-Hindu avoids using word Hindustan.
You need something? Next time, try writing something succinct so that everyone can understand it.