What's new

India Raises its Game vs. China

picture is actually bigger than that everything is not black and white
u are saying that no NATO force came so its not NATO involvement what i say is NATO came and instead of taking direct casualty they hired the killers "hire the army for Jihad" and did intervene in the matter so yes there was no face to face interaction of american and russian in afgan but they staged the whole drama
its just like i can hire some gangster for a murder and i dont have to face the person whom i want dead still i am the key person in the murder


Man you'r good:tup::victory::victory::victory::victory:
 
.
India doesn't gain anything by keeping Arunachal and J&K...

But it hurts when it looses both... bcoz J&K is the main source of water for north India...a back bone of Indian Economy...

And Arunachal is imp bcoz it will keep most of North East secure from forming independent state's...and china may get access to Bay of Bengal threatening the entire south india....

For me all this military posture will only help if there is a full scale war but for now all that we should do is repeat wat R&AW did in 80's like CIT-X and CIT-J operations...

For Pakistan we should encourage people of baloch for independence....for me as a Indian, the greatest gift is assassination of dawood Ibrahim...And supporting Kashmir pandits to settle in Kashmir and make the people who are against national objectives as miniority in kashmir itself and curb anti national voices there by securing Kashmir...Pump fake currency note into pak...Use strong diplomacy to prevent pak acquiring weapons from western country....

And for China support tibet monks for revolts of large scale....Support Uyghur extremists....Support mongol insurgents and create headache for china in there heart land itself...

If china is encircling India then do the same for China.... in fact the only enemy India has is pak and china (i dont think Bangla Srilanka and myanmar would dare to allow other countries to use their land against there huge neighbour)....If India wants to encircle it has nearly a dozen imp ASEAN countries....
 
.
picture is actually bigger than that everything is not black and white
u are saying that no NATO force came so its not NATO involvement what i say is NATO came and instead of taking direct casualty they hired the killers "hire the army for Jihad" and did intervene in the matter so yes there was no face to face interaction of american and russian in afgan but they staged the whole drama
its just like i can hire some gangster for a murder and i dont have to face the person whom i want dead still i am the key person in the murder
dude...there was already a huge resistance in afghanistan against the invading commies. The mujahideen were fighting but lacked weapons. They were still using ww2 era weapon like the enfield smle. NATO gave them ak47 and stinger, saudis gave them funds and pakistan trained the mujahideen.
 
.
dude...there was already a huge resistance in afghanistan against the invading commies. The mujahideen were fighting but lacked weapons. They were still using ww2 era weapon like the enfield smle. NATO gave them ak47 and stinger, saudis gave them funds and pakistan trained the mujahideen.[/QUOTE]


Thanks for aknowledging the facts yourself My Kind Sir ,Thanks .:azn::victory::victory::victory::victory:
 
.
dude...there was already a huge resistance in afghanistan against the invading commies. The mujahideen were fighting but lacked weapons. They were still using ww2 era weapon like the enfield smle. NATO gave them ak47 and stinger, saudis gave them funds and pakistan trained the mujahideen.[/QUOTE]


Thanks for aknowledging the facts yourself My Kind Sir ,Thanks .:azn::victory::victory::victory::victory:
mujahideen are not taliban. most of then joined the northern alliance. and pakistan didnt want soviet union a good friend of india to be next to our door. you are welcome, pakistan has a big hand in defeating the communist red invaders
 
.
dude...there was already a huge resistance in afghanistan against the invading commies. The mujahideen were fighting but lacked weapons. They were still using ww2 era weapon like the enfield smle. NATO gave them ak47 and stinger, saudis gave them funds and pakistan trained the mujahideen.
just nswer a simple question and please be honest
was it all posiible without USA support?
as per me the honest answer is NO
no country had guts to eyeball russians in 80s so forget the saudis they just followed the USA

---------- Post added at 08:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:13 PM ----------

mujahideen are not taliban. most of then joined the northern alliance. and pakistan didnt want soviet union a good friend of india to be next to our door. you are welcome, pakistan has a big hand in defeating the communist red invaders
ofcourse pakistan take responsibility for disintegrating soviet also
living in ur own well
anyways back on topic i believe strength of indian army should more than 2 million atleast
 
.
India doesn't gain anything by keeping Arunachal and J&K...

But it hurts when it looses both... bcoz J&K is the main source of water for north India...a back bone of Indian Economy...

And Arunachal is imp bcoz it will keep most of North East secure from forming independent state's...and china may get access to Bay of Bengal threatening the entire south india....

For me all this military posture will only help if there is a full scale war but for now all that we should do is repeat wat R&AW did in 80's like CIT-X and CIT-J operations...

For Pakistan we should encourage people of baloch for independence....for me as a Indian, the greatest gift is assassination of dawood Ibrahim...And supporting Kashmir pandits to settle in Kashmir and make the people who are against national objectives as miniority in kashmir itself and curb anti national voices there by securing Kashmir...Pump fake currency note into pak...Use strong diplomacy to prevent pak acquiring weapons from western country....

And for China support tibet monks for revolts of large scale....Support Uyghur extremists....Support mongol insurgents and create headache for china in there heart land itself...

If china is encircling India then do the same for China.... in fact the only enemy India has is pak and china (i dont think Bangla Srilanka and myanmar would dare to allow other countries to use their land against there huge neighbour)....If India wants to encircle it has nearly a dozen imp ASEAN countries....

You play too much command and conquer for your own good.
 
.
India doesn't gain anything by keeping Arunachal and J&K...

But it hurts when it looses both... bcoz J&K is the main source of water for north India...a back bone of Indian Economy...

And Arunachal is imp bcoz it will keep most of North East secure from forming independent state's...and china may get access to Bay of Bengal threatening the entire south india....

For me all this military posture will only help if there is a full scale war but for now all that we should do is repeat wat R&AW did in 80's like CIT-X and CIT-J operations...

For Pakistan we should encourage people of baloch for independence....for me as a Indian, the greatest gift is assassination of dawood Ibrahim...And supporting Kashmir pandits to settle in Kashmir and make the people who are against national objectives as miniority in kashmir itself and curb anti national voices there by securing Kashmir...Pump fake currency note into pak...Use strong diplomacy to prevent pak acquiring weapons from western country....

And for China support tibet monks for revolts of large scale....Support Uyghur extremists....Support mongol insurgents and create headache for china in there heart land itself...

If china is encircling India then do the same for China.... in fact the only enemy India has is pak and china (i dont think Bangla Srilanka and myanmar would dare to allow other countries to use their land against there huge neighbour)....If India wants to encircle it has nearly a dozen imp ASEAN countries....

what are u smoking??
arunachal have oil and gas which can feed india till 100 years..
and j&k is the water hub. and u r saying that we dont gain anything..:lol:
:hitwall:

i cant acccept from any indian to write this..but u r first.
 
.
mujahideen are not taliban. most of then joined the northern alliance. and pakistan didnt want soviet union a good friend of india to be next to our door. you are welcome, pakistan has a big hand in defeating the communist red invaders


Thanks sir to be so precise ,anyway pakistan helped US in its goal & gotsaudi funds + F-16's & other wepons in reward but now you are paying it back by blood so kindly tell me was it a wise option or INDIAN stand(being nutral & still enjoing both Russian and US support ) , Thanks .:azn:
 
.
just nswer a simple question and please be honest
was it all posiible without USA support?
as per me the honest answer is NO
no country had guts to eyeball russians in 80s so forget the saudis they just followed the USA

---------- Post added at 08:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:13 PM ----------

ofcourse pakistan take responsibility for disintegrating soviet also
living in ur own well
we played a big role against the invading soviets. we even risked our own soldiers and sent pilots in afghan airspace, and in one incident we lost a plane. You got a problem with that?

---------- Post added at 07:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:49 PM ----------

Thanks sir to be so precise ,anyway pakistan helped US in its goal & gotsaudi funds + F-16's & other wepons in reward but now you are paying it back by blood so kindly tell me was it a wise option or INDIAN stand(being nutral & still enjoing both Russian and US support ) , Thanks .:azn:
as i said most of the mujahideen later joined the northern alliance which was fighting the taliban. do you have a problem with undertsanding that?
 
.
just nswer a simple question and please be honest
was it all posiible without USA support?
as per me the honest answer is NO
no country had guts to eyeball russians in 80s so forget the saudis they just followed the USA

---------- Post added at 08:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:13 PM ----------


we played a big role against the invading soviets. we even risked our own soldiers and sent pilots in afghan airspace, and in one incident we lost a plane. You got a problem with that?
india doesnt have any issue with what pakistan does its pakistan who is bleeding today because of these foolish policies
so u have got the problem
 
. . . .
do you know what a proxy war is? go read about it
there were no direct NATO inolvement in afghanistan war. they were just supplying. Soviet union had warsaw pacts support
and stop saying NATO fought soviets in afghanistan. mujahideen has all the credibility and pakistan some of it because we actually sent our pilots there. NATO was involved in the propoganda war
Pakistan sent its pilots? Did you folks use your aircraft against the soviets?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom