What's new

India Pushes Russia For Greater Inclusion In Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft Development

OK, we don't have tech to contribute. But we contributed 50 percent of project cost. Therefore, we should entitle for 50 percent Tech transfer without any iff and but.

If we are paying 295million for design tht means complete design at least should be at our disposal.
 
.
OK, we don't have tech to contribute. But we contributed 50 percent of project cost. Therefore, we should entitle for 50 percent Tech transfer without any iff and but.

If we are paying 295million for design tht means complete design at least should be at our disposal.
it was our own fault that we delayed the deal(design contract) and by the time we signed they had already freezed the design.
we will get tot but not of radar,avionics and engines.
 
.
Bullocks!

Allow me to share my direct, 1'st hand experience from the aerospace industry.
  • First, 70% is avionics. That's where the big advances are.
Second, not engines, not airframes. Both of these are well established tech. fields with only incremental bit-by-bit innovation. Plenty of professors around the world do cutting edge research in these fields, there's no black magic in them.

Third, consultants, often blue-eyed professors or their pet grad students, will consult you on anything and everything re: technology right out of the public funded university or institute lab.

Lastly, drones are due to replace fighters to the extent that insiders say the Russian and American 5'th gen. jets will be the last of the breed. With the fall of the Berlin wall and the peace break-out thereafter, there's no more business case for these pie-in-the-sky zombie's. Sure the above will keep a minimum fleet and yahoo's like Brazil, Canada, Oz and Germany can fly them at cost while China, India and Pakistan may continue their mini cold war and spit out their own version of the clunkers; the business is definitely on its way out.

Warfare business moved from land, to sea, to air and now to outer-space.

If you have the money, I can make you the best fighter jet in the world!

Bhai in Bhai saheb ko kuch kam de do.8-)

exactly
if we can't even make the avionics of dhruv helicopter then how the **** we will contribute in pakfa??


Politicians are not giving money bhai, they are headeache for not open money bag. India may go tobuilt such airframe which save itself from the, IRST, and to built DAS(distributed aperture like system), radar based comunications, air to air barak-1 which destroy enemy missile?:azn::yahoo:
 
Last edited:
.
Bhai in Bhai saheb ko kuch kam de do.8-)




Politicians are not giving money bhai, they are headeache for not open money bag. India may go tobuilt such airframe which save itself from the, IRST, and to built DAS(distributed aperture like system), radar based comunications, air to air barak-1 which destroy enemy missile?:azn::yahoo:

i agree we should focus much more in house and go china way
we will suffer for some time but in 5-6 years we will develop a good industry
 
.
Besides software there is nothing that India can do. And no other "co-producer" is willing to sell its secret. Let we look at Israeli India medium range SAM... Israel is not willing to share everything and India has nothing to add. Same same.

Huh Pathetic troll is back again.Last time it was with the claim ' Pakistan is ahead in missile technology'

We are not talking about Pakistani contribution to JF 17 - a few software codes written in C++ language...

Do you know how many avionics components of Su 30 MKI was developed by India?HAL is on its way in developing the Jet Starter for the FGFA.

And India has no contribution in LRSAM?

We develop the rearsection.


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/TD8xm-vQQgI/AAAAAAAAK6M/9nG7kJlmQaw/s1600/LRSAM1-783236.jpg

And also involved in Weapon Control and Radar system.
 
.
Huh Pathetic troll is back again.Last time it was with the claim ' Pakistan is ahead in missile technology'

We are not talking about Pakistani contribution to JF 17 - a few software codes written in C++ language...

Do you know how many avionics components of Su 30 MKI was developed by India?HAL is on its way in developing the Jet Starter for the FGFA.

And India has no contribution in LRSAM?

We develop the rearsection.


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/TD8xm-vQQgI/AAAAAAAAK6M/9nG7kJlmQaw/s1600/LRSAM1-783236.jpg

And also involved in Weapon Control and Radar system.


it is one thing for indians to critisise our system and introspect and another for pakistanis to take a shot at us


are these guys delusional or what??

if india can do 30-40% things on our own these guys can't even do 4% and they come here and become preachers!!

they don't even know what equipment their jf-17 uses and are commenting on us,lol
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom