India plans to assassinate Sheikh Hasina, blame extremists

[linkinpark]

Even now, AL is a pro-indian party. Why India will assassinate leader of that party, what will it stand to gain as opposed to losing by assassinating her. All I can do is at the poster's sourceless article.

 

[idune]

@idune

What option BD has to block RAW activities in future?

To what extent Hasina Wajid shares role of RAW in Bangladesh?

What you think if AL was installed to what extent RAW will try to consolidate its hold in BD?

Why RAW doesnt want to see a strong Bangladesh?

These are all very important and interesting questions and requires rather broad response. I intend to answer all your questions but may not be today.
My apology.

 

[Moscow]

Does the indian media have any credibility after the way they acted in the mumbai attacks,they were full of baseless stories even before the investigating authorities had started their job.
so guys do not worry about these reports because the media from time to time come out with spicy stories to increase their trps.
i also doubt the proper interpretation of the report as no links r submitted.

even if u consider the report to be true then what would be the logic to take such a step. hasina seems to be indias best bet. is there anyone better that india has in mind that would serve its interest better is the question to be asked?
thank you

 

[idune]

Even now, AL is a pro-indian party. Why India will assassinate leader of that party, what will it stand to gain as opposed to losing by assassinating her. All I can do is at the poster's sourceless article.

Before 2007 election south block had decided Hasina is no longer reliable indian policy pusher in Bangladesh. There were few reasons for such indian decesion. Therefore in the height of 1/11 RAW had created another power contending group within Awami league (namely RATS) to challenge Hasina. But Hasina survived because broad grass root Awami support and RAW mission failed to install more indian obedient leadership in Awami league.

Now you have to do your diligence on your intelligence agency and dont comeback with silly noise.

 

[azmax007]

Well they blame extremists but the thing is the Indian government wants a destabilized Bangladesh. Bangladesh is rapidly becoming a great destination for new cheap labor since the wages of Chinese workers have risen and so EU and USA companies are moving in to Bangladesh. It's in India's best interest to destabilize a growing economy like Bangladesh's.

India's RAW assassinated General Ziur Rahman in the past because he wanted Bangladesh to be more of a Muslim nation than a satellite nation of India.

 

[linkinpark]

Well they blame extremists but the thing is the Indian government wants a destabilized Bangladesh. Bangladesh is rapidly becoming a great destination for new cheap labor since the wages of Chinese workers have risen and so EU and USA companies are moving in to Bangladesh. It's in India's best interest to destabilize a growing economy like Bangladesh's.

It is not in India's interest to destabilize BD. We want BD to be more self-sufficient as we already face a lot of Illegal immigration problem for BD. If we destabilize there will be more illegal immigration and more problems for India. Indian economy is not completely export oriented and doesn't have to destabilize just to increase some exports.

 

[azmax007]

It is not in India's interest to destabilize BD. We want BD to be more self-sufficient as we already face a lot of Illegal immigration problem for BD. If we destabilize there will be more illegal immigration and more problems for India. Indian economy is not completely export oriented and doesn't have to destabilize just to increase some exports.

India as in who the people? It's not the Indian people, who I'm talking about it's the right wing Indian government who wants to destabilize Bangladesh. The economic sanctions against Bangladesh shows the deprivation India puts on Bangladesh and the Indian economic dominance in Bangladesh. If India was so into keep Bangladesh stabilized then why all the RAW tactics in Bangladesh and the hidden war between ISI and RAW within Bangladesh?

 

[linkinpark]

India as in who the people? It's not the Indian people, who I'm talking about it's the right wing Indian government who wants to destabilize Bangladesh. The economic sanctions against Bangladesh shows the deprivation India puts on Bangladesh and the Indian economic dominance in Bangladesh. If India was so into keep Bangladesh stabilized then why all the RAW tactics in Bangladesh and the hidden war between ISI and RAW within Bangladesh?

This is nothing but delusional world you are living in. ISI using BD to infiltrate terrorists into India, that is the only complaint that India has with BD, apart from that I don't see any differences between BD and India. There is more to gain to be friendly with BD rather than being an enemy with BD.

 

[Raquib]

Could we get a link for this?

yea... go to bdmilitary website...you'll see it on the first page...
it is not allowed to link bdmilitary and thats why i did not give the link....

 

[Raquib]

And who is providing this security???? Supposedly India......

we have our own Special Security Force....

 

[M_Saint]

We want BD to be more self-sufficient as we already face a lot of Illegal immigration problem for BD. If we destabilize there will be more illegal immigration and more problems for India.

Being tired of observing the constant pounding on 'Phony Hindu genocide' in 1971 and Bangladeshi Muslim’s influxes in Indian cities by Indians, I couldn’t resist anymore for providing some facts. The frothing of Hindu genocide became so frequent that the numerous pages popped up in a Google search by key word 'Hindu percentage pre-1947 at Bangladesh', which resembled the stack of lies on building cases for WMD in Iraq’s possession. But not (None, Nada, Zip, Zilch) even a single claim was proven judicially or CIA Fact book didn’t document a single case. Furthermore, the following statistics would show that since 1941 Hindus in large number migrated from East Pakistan/Bangladesh.

The Hindu population in East Bengal had declined from 33% in 1901 to 28% in 1941. It fell to 22% by 1951 due to the Partition and the post-Partition exodus, and to 18.5% in 1961. By 1971, it had fallen to 13.5%, partly due to the 1971 massacre by the Pakistani Army, partly due to intermittent waves of emigration. The 1981 figure was 12.1%. In 1989 and 1990, due to "large-scale destruction, desecration and damage inflicted on Hindu temples and religious institutions"[11], "clandestine migration by the Hindus to India went up".
Immigration from Bangladesh

Was there any notable pressure from Muslim GOVTs up until today? Answer to that, no judicially established evidence found in that regard.

Moreover, trend and pattern of Hindu fanatic’s behavior since 1947 supported that they were always busy in shifting their own failures to Muslims in neighboring countries just to earn political capital, which off course never solved the root causes of mass’s grievances in IND.

And finally read from page 301 (Immigration and Asylum: From 1900 to ... - Google Book Search) and onward to find out the facts for refuge influxes. It wasn’t Muslims but Hindus that migrated and pushed Muslims of West Bengal out of their homes with the support of successive W Bengal/Indian GOVTs. Later the same Hindu fanatics in the form of Congress/Commie/BJP demonstrated insincerity on providing W Bengali Muslims necessary goodies for basic living and started to paint them as Bangladeshis. There is no logic for Bangladeshi Muslims to migrate IND since that is not a land of Milk & honey and the socio-economic conditions/HDI (India Together: HDI rankings portray a poor and unhealthy nation - 25 September 2005) in rural areas of BD are better than IND.


Side note- The dilemma of partition is the underlined cause for migration but not what the Hindu fanatics repeatedly disseminate forums like this.

hindu percentage in East Pakistan at 1947 - Google Search

 

[azmax007]

There is more to gain to be friendly with BD rather than being an enemy with BD.

You're absolutely right, there is more to gain but does Indian government want that? NO. I know the Indian people do, but their government don't. Bangladeshi satellite channels are banned from airing to India. How come they're not banned in USA, we have Ekushey TV, nTV, RTV, BanglaVision, ATN Bangla, and Channel i, all six satellite channels aired via DishNetwork, and I have all of them. Why is India blocking them? Bengalis are the largest ethnic group out of all the ethnic groups in India, and yet Bengali content from Bangladesh is banned. On top of that Bangladeshi products are also restricted or banned from being accessed to India's market. Also, Bangladeshi businesses are not allowed to invest in India with 'fear' that Bangladeshi money is terrorist money. What a bunch bullshit. And you wonder why Bangladeshis hate India, the same reason why Pakistan hates India, cz of the hypocrisy and bullshit the Indian government plays on the Muslim neighbors.

India doesn't want Bangladesh to be prosperous and they want chaos. They could care less about the immigration because most Bangladeshis are taking over Assam and the Indian federal government can't do **** about it.

 

[theonlyone]

^^ instead of blindly accusing india of hypocrisy can u tell me where india is unfair with bangladesh in comparison to any other country?

 

[Moscow]

You're absolutely right, there is more to gain but does Indian government want that? NO. I know the Indian people do, but their government don't. Bangladeshi satellite channels are banned from airing to India. How come they're not banned in USA, we have Ekushey TV, nTV, RTV, BanglaVision, ATN Bangla, and Channel i, all six satellite channels aired via DishNetwork, and I have all of them. Why is India blocking them? Bengalis are the largest ethnic group out of all the ethnic groups in India, and yet Bengali content from Bangladesh is banned. On top of that Bangladeshi products are also restricted or banned from being accessed to India's market. Also, Bangladeshi businesses are not allowed to invest in India with 'fear' that Bangladeshi money is terrorist money. What a bunch bullshit. And you wonder why Bangladeshis hate India, the same reason why Pakistan hates India, cz of the hypocrisy and bullshit the Indian government plays on the Muslim neighbors.

India doesn't want Bangladesh to be prosperous and they want chaos. They could care less about the immigration because most Bangladeshis are taking over Assam and the Indian federal government can't do **** about it.

sir if the bangladeshis hate india then why is it that they want to invest in india or want to want their products or channels to be available in india.if india bans bangladeshi product or channels why cant bangladesh do the same.
incase of india pakistan relations it has being a tit for tat relation for a long time.
from your comments sir i get the opinion that the anger for bangladeshis is because of india doing "something "and not because of bangladesh goverment not doing that " something "
and about your immigration issue due you really think that is possible.can ever bangladesh match with indias gigantic population< i am not talking army or weapons > if india decides to immigrate bangladesh do you understand what the numbers can pilke up to?
sir a logical solution to the problem is far better i guess.

 

[third eye]

Why does the title of this thread remind me of Benazir & what happened to her ? Is this a prelude to what may happen / is intended for Hasina in the days ahead ?