India patronize Hindu militant group for breaking Bangladesh and setup a Hindu state

[leonblack08]

Rightly said. Islam is above all. No compromise.

Isalami Jamoriat prefer over secular democracy.

Jaamat Islami did bend their principle to get into power,that too under the leadership of a woman.

Hizbut Tahrir would be the choice if you want Sharia law,but they are bit extreme but better than Jamat e Islami on any given day.Very soon they will be banned by the so called secular govt. of AL though.

And again on the issue of BD turning into Hindu state,well let those idiots have as much wet dream as they want,but that's not gonna happen.
The thing with BD people is that even if they understand their religion less but they will fight to defend it.

 

[TopCat]

Did we not reach a decisive point that Bangladesh will not be a Islamic Republic and will not implement any Sharia Law. The people will not accept it. Why the question of Hindu state even coming here? No it will not be a Hindu state either.

What a Pointless arguement.

 

[Al-zakir]

Jaamat Islami did bend their principle to get into power,that too under the leadership of a woman.

Brother
I think you miss understand my point. I said 'Isalami Jamoriat' which mean Islamic democracy similar to khalifat.

 

[Al-zakir]

Did we not reach a decisive point that Bangladesh will not be a Islamic Republic and will not implement any Sharia Law. The people will not accept it. Why the question of Hindu state even coming here? No it will not be a Hindu state either.

What a Pointless arguement.

Who made that choice? Have we done any referendum to test your theory? Unless is done than you have no right to conclude your biased theory.

 

[TopCat]

Who made that choice? Have we done any referendum to test your theory? Unless is done than you have no right to conclude your biased theory.

Mandate was taken again and again since 1954 and people dumped that idea to dustbin every time ever since. We have less than 5% of the vote goes towards ultra right wing parties regardless of election hold under every regime.

 

[Al-zakir]

Mandate was taken again and again since 1954 and people dumped that idea to dustbin every time ever since. We have less than 5% of the vote goes towards ultra right wing parties regardless of election hold under every regime.

coming out from your mouth is understandable.

Shariah law comes from Qur'aan which mean it's a part of qur'aan. Not follwowing it fully is one thing but outward rejection with this much hate is denial of some part of Qur'aan. Astagfirullah

 

[vandemataram]

The Hindu Bengalis do not accept the Sultanate period as part of their history. They ignore everything that is Muslim. They cannot claim it now. If they had accepted Islam as part of Bengal history they would have separated from India after 1971 and created a Brihot Bangladesh. They cannot claim a part of history that they now disdain.

Excuse me Mr. Munshi, where do you get the idea from? Who taught you? Which history books have you read? And which Indian history books have you read to make such a stupid inference?

The fact that Bengal Sultanate starting from Bakhtiyar Khalji was never more prominent in your part of the world, than it was in our part of the world.

It is simply a bizarre idea to claim history on your side on the basis of the fact that it was an Islamic Sultanate.

Mr. Munshi, Gaur, Pandua and Lakhnauti were never in your part of the country. They were and still are in and around the main Malda town of West Bengal and not B'desh.

Wake up. What is meant by ignore that is muslim? What does it mean? If they accepted Muslim rule in Bengal they should have converted to Islam and moved away from India?

Dont you know these Sultans ruled the awam that was Hindu?

Or do you think that is your greatest grievance that these Sultans with all the power that they had coulnt remove the Hindu race from Bengal and convert everyone into BIGOTS?


I have read Bengal Sultanate History as it was. With due credits (if at all) were due at any point in time of their reign till the advent of Sher Shah Suri.

 

[vandemataram]

They would have accepted the culture of resistance to New Delhi set by the Sultanate.

Stupid to the core.... Hastinapur, Shahjahanabad (Mint Town) and Hadrat Dilli (Mint Town of the Dilli Sultanate) are the names to talk about (Not New Delhi), at least not during the period that we are talking about

 

[vandemataram]

Rightly said. Islam is above all. No compromise.


Isalami Jamoriat prefer over secular democracy.

Islami Jamhurriyat ....that is the phonetically correct word Zakir, at least that is what your brothers in the Ummat e Muslima pronounce this...

 

[vandemataram]

Nothing we can do about those Hindus who leave Bangladesh for India. Bangladeshi Hindus are well off and fairly interrogated in main stream unlike fascist Indian. We never kill Hindu in the name of religion unlike India. We never had massacre like Gujarat in our soil so why complain. Bangladesh is Islam dominate country thus if Hindu feel that it's not suitable for them than they are free to go wherever.

Of course what can you do....earlier Tikka Khan and his ilk butchered Hindus of East Pakistan and then of course your war hero Gen Zia who formed the BNP (where you cast your vote)...continued with the repression of capturing properties of the minorities ....millions of acres of arable lands were taken away and confiscated by the

GONOPROJATANTRIK BANGLADESH SORKAR ....on the pretext of Enemy Property Act (Earlier) and later the Vested Property Act.

Let us try and do this to your borthers in India...let us take all lands, factories, machines and every other means of livelihood and then see if they do not cross over to your country or your brothers to our west...

Genocide is the word...not only physical but mental and economical..your Govt has confiscated Hindu property worth more than the GNP/GDP of your country........

 

[vandemataram]

It's not that Bangladeshis killed Hindus.The fact is HIndus migrated to India.Is it really the fault of bd?Let's face it..BD has huge Muslim population so of course it will remain Islamic country.

No ...of course not ..it is Pakistanis which killed Hindus. (remember the butcher of bangladesh) Lt Gen. and later Gen. Tikka Khan and even later Governor of Punjab .....seems you have been taught history bang on .....

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Stupid to the core.... Hastinapur, Shahjahanabad (Mint Town) and Hadrat Dilli (Mint Town of the Dilli Sultanate) are the names to talk about (Not New Delhi), at least not during the period that we are talking about

I was oversimplifying but the point is that they did not show the requisite resistance. Rather than nit pick make a useful point.

 

[Al-zakir]

Islami Jamhurriyat ....that is the phonetically correct word Zakir, at least that is what your brothers in the Ummat e Muslima pronounce this...

Jamhurriyat means republic whereas Jamoriat mean democracy.

 

[Al-zakir]

war hero Gen Zia who formed the BNP (where you cast your vote)

Well General Zia is the Islamic hero in modern Bangladesh. Respected by all Muslim and I am no different.

 

[TopCat]

GONOPROJATANTRIK BANGLADESH SORKAR ....on the pretext of Enemy Property Act (Earlier) and later the Vested Property Act.

Let us try and do this to your borthers in India...let us take all lands, factories, machines and every other means of livelihood and then see if they do not cross over to your country or your brothers to our west...

Genocide is the word...not only physical but mental and economical..your Govt has confiscated Hindu property worth more than the GNP/GDP of your country........

Vested property act was made to protect the property of Hindus who left Bangaldesh and can be claimed back if anybody wish to return. That is what the act meant for because there were a lot of misappropriation of those abandoned property. I know few cases even recently some of the inherits of those property who came to BD and claimed those land and sold them in open market. Even govt can not sell or lease them for more than one year as the property is meant to be returned immediately.
By saying that there are a lot of controversy about that act as some hindus living in BD claimed that their property is made Vested even though they had rights on those, for instance brothers property. These are purely legal matters and should be resolved in the court of law. Govt also reviewing some of the clauses of the act for quick disposal of those cases.