India-Pakistan Talks - 2010

[All-Green]

like usual they talk on unneccesary things for few months then we hear abt a terrorist attack in india and all the talks again go to the recycle bin

months later again some talk,again an attack
this goes on
just waste of time

My young friend do not take offence but i cannot resist here.

Is it a waste of your own time that your are so upset about and consider all talks futile just because in the past the process was derailed?
Although it seems you do have some time to spare so i think that is not it.

If talking as a concept is a waste of time then why are you wasting your time here?
Or is it that there is indeed merit in exhcange of thought and worth it to talk?

Why this duplicity when you know that our personal exchange is quite trivial compared with what the government level exchange can lead to?

Think about it.

You can choose not to talk, does not mean it is the right thing to do.
Terrorism is not a franchise of Pakistan, it is a global phenomena and terrorists are chaotic and anarchist.
Look around you and you will see many terrorist movements; some even within the confines of India.

Our problem was more complicated due to Afghan conflict and its fallout but today the intent of GOP and PA is in no doubt due to their overtly strict anti extremist stance and their bloody engagement with the terrorists groups which has earned the Pakistanis of the combined wrath of all such groups.
The evidence of this stance is the thousands of our brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, sons and daughters who have been martyred by terrorist groups in hundreds of attacks.

 

[Jackdaws]

Oh we will give them a full Khalistan if they really want it - of course it will have to be carved from the 2 Punjabs - areas like Lahore and Nanakana Sahib can be given to the separatist Sikhs as a sign of goodwill by the Pakistanis. Is that acceptable to Pakistan/Pakistanis?

 

[ameer219]

Oh we will give them a full Khalistan if they really want it

Yeah,I have seen that,they were so excited over Khalistan that they accidentally killed Indira Gandhi

 

[Adwitiya]

Yeah,I have seen that,they were so excited over Khalistan that they accidentally killed Indira Gandhi

when ?????1984 i think we are in 2010.... 26 years in between... grow up and move on

 

[ameer219]

when ?????1984 i think we are in 2010.... 26 years in between... grow up and move on

I doubt you know whats happening.

 

[jagjitnatt]

I doubt you know whats happening.

whats happening is that you're all derailing the thread.

Stick to the topic.

 

[leon]

Where in this article,was there a protest occuring,or have occured RECENTLY,like in Kashmir just last month??Where?
Man,You can only state claims, and your BLA wikipedia,thats not even a source.Prove a proper one.

I would have walked away,but sorry.making such claims about me is unacceptable

it seems insurgency for u is just some protest by 4 people with some hoardings

because some people showed in kashmir with that

baloch is not in turmoil becoz there r no hoardings,armed movement dont count for,is it

 

[Adwitiya]

I doubt you know whats happening.

yes i know some poeple are living in fools paradise and then cry why the hell their world so foolish we should do something about it. and then another zaid hamid or someone else with a laal topi is born

 

[leon]

Yeah,I have seen that,they were so excited over Khalistan that they accidentally killed Indira Gandhi

and then what nobody ever heard abt khalistan after that

 

[ameer219]

whats happening is that you're all derailing the thread.

Stick to the topic.

Ok I will

and then what nobody ever heard abt khalistan after that

Hey let's drop the topic of Khalistan and stick to the topic aites?We derailed the thread too much,let's stick to the India Pakistan talks

yes i know some poeple are living in fools paradise and then cry why the hell their world so foolish we should do something about it. and then another zaid hamid or someone else with a laal topi is born

I don't know what you meant by that,but we just stick to the thread

baloch is not in turmoil becoz there r no hoardings,armed movement dont count for,is it

Dude,just the same,you considered the LeT to be a terrorist supported group by a country,we consider BLA to be a terrorist supported group by a country.Furthermore,the people have not expressed their interests to become an independent state,its only the armed groups of BLA.

If you want to compare Kashmir with Balochistan, then you might as well compare the protests of this two countries.

Furthermore Balochistan is already part of Pakistan,in which the people agreed to be part of Pakistan in 1947,but not Kashmir,I do not know why you still consider them to be the same.

First you showed 2 sources that stated there was some protests which was false,now you come and tell me that people have to protests.

If Balochistan really wanted independent from Pakistan,they would have protested their rule,just like Kashmiris did,maybe form strikes,or revolt,but I don't see that happening except for arm insurgency.

If that's the case,I can also state that the people of Assam wants Independence,because of the insurgency by ULFA and NDFB.

 

[Adwitiya]

Ok I will



Hey let's drop the topic of Khalistan and stick to the topic aites?We derailed the thread too much,let's stick to the India Pakistan talks



I don't know what you meant by that,but we just stick to the thread



Dude,just the same,you considered the LeT to be a terrorist supported group by a country,we consider BLA to be a terrorist supported group by a country.Furthermore,the people have not expressed their interests to become an independent state,its only the armed groups of BLA.

If you want to compare Kashmir with Balochistan, then you might as well compare the protests of this two countries.

Furthermore Balochistan is already part of Pakistan,in which the people agreed to be part of Pakistan in 1947,but not Kashmir,I do not know why you still consider them to be the same

^^^^ I knew you wont understand that.... Thats the main reason for all your problems. if you would have understood you would have been in a good state...

 

[ameer219]

I knew you wont understand that.... Thats the main reason for all your problems. if you would have understood you would have been in a good state...

Ok whatever

 

[Jackdaws]

Yeah,I have seen that,they were so excited over Khalistan that they accidentally killed Indira Gandhi

My point was that give them Lahore and Nankana Sahib if you are so concerned about Khalistan - we can then give them Amritsar - after all you are champions of all secessionist movements.

 

[leon]

Dude,just the same,you considered the LeT to be a terrorist supported group by a country,we consider BLA to be a terrorist supported group by a country.Furthermore,the people have not expressed their interests to become an independent state,its only the armed groups of BLA.

If you want to compare Kashmir with Balochistan, then you might as well compare the protests of this two countries.

Furthermore Balochistan is already part of Pakistan,in which the people agreed to be part of Pakistan in 1947,but not Kashmir,I do not know why you still consider them to be the same.

First you showed 2 sources that stated there was some protests which was false,now you come and tell me that people have to protests.

If Balochistan really wanted independent from Pakistan,they would have protested their rule,just like Kashmiris did,maybe form strikes,or revolt,but I don't see that happening except for arm insurgency.

If that's the case,I can also state that the people of Assam wants Independence,because of the insurgency by ULFA and NDFB.

now u brought assam into the scenario and i am going going to bring SWAT,FATA and even tibet in the scene.

first u ask for the source,when given u claim that is false simply belive ur brainwashed enough to not belive it

and i can now also ask for some credible soure abt ur so called kashmir freedom movement other than ur some pathetic video

and if u dont know kashmir's history dont brag much

after independence hari singh sighned the accession paper when kashmir came under attack from ur pashtun tribals from NWFP

and the land they grabbed befor india's entry into the scene is today known as azad kashmir

i dont want to talk this topic anymore as it is derailing the thread

 

[ameer219]

i dont want to talk this topic anymore as it is derailing the thread

Lol,You want to bring Swat and FATA in.Man,you really need to read up history.There is no insurgency there,only Balochistan,and Tibet is annexed by China,not Pakistan!

Fine we shall not discuss this topic,as its derailing the thread.

and i can now also ask for some credible soure abt ur so called kashmir freedom movement other than ur some pathetic video

and if u dont know kashmir's history dont brag much

Dude,don't come and judge me what I know and what I do not know about Kashmir.

Dude,what you meant by pathetic video?Please be more professional.You even gave a source that's not related in anyway about people wanting to seperate from Pakistan from Balochistan