Good one.......
We r only worried about the fact that it might make the whole region unstable which will hamper our economic growth.
Stability is definitely a pre-requisite for economic growth (talking about our own here). Some of the countries in South Asia are definitely devolving into unstable status which we have to actively deal with using international fora and negotiations.
If some country wants to make their own population suffer by destabilizing things in the neighborhood, it definitely becomes our business.
Irony is that last time Bangladesh acted as side kick of India and boycotted SAARC. Announced to stand with India in case of war, how suddenly you are "ideally placed for negotiating peace between the two countries"?
It's Pakistan only which can stand against Indian dictate in SAARC, it's fact which can't be denied.
You don't reform an organization by leaving it, you stay inside, negotiate and forge new relationship with countries like Bangladesh. How does China engage with Bangladesh (even after we turned them down for submarine base) and Pakistan can't get to first step?
I guess IK is now ideally placed to do this and we are hoping for the best. Bangladesh' relationship with Pakistan and India are not on an even keel and your leaders now realize this. Some quarter needs to be given officially as the equation has changed.
If Bangladesh and Pakistan make up diplomatically (long road but you have to start somewhere) and talk with same voice, then India has to listen.
Pakistan alone cannot 'stand against Indian dictate in SAARC' as you say - the world (and South Asia) has changed. Realization has not set in yet in Pakistan.
Threats of 'atum bum' clearly aren't scaring the Indians. If your economy is in tatters (some say worse than ours), Indians now have become pretty assured of how short of a military engagement Pakistan can deliver....you need money to run even a short skirmish.
Per US Media, the US support is drying up as well. So China is only hope.